White House bans criticism of “HATE”

Any protest against White Genocide is ridiculously smeared as “hate” by anti-whites.

The White House has supported this absurd assault on Whites by removing this petition from its petition site:

Declare “HATE” to be a hate word used to carry out WHITE GENOCIDE!

Do you oppose affirmative action?

You’re a “hater”!

Do you prefer to live in a crime-free White community?

You’re a “hater”!

Do you oppose the flooding of White countries worldwide with third-world non-whites, and Whites being forced by law to assimilate with them and be blended out of existence?

You’re a “hater”!

Anti-whites, livid with hate for me and my race, snarl “hater” at me when I do or say anything that slows their steady march of genocide against the White race.

Declare “Hater,” “bigot,” “racist,” “supremacist,” to be hate words used by anti-whites to cloak their program of White Genocide!

They say they’re anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.


For a future with White children




That petition was one of our three STOP WHITE GENOCIDE petitions in December, and is one of two petitions the White House has removed so far out of the 57 we’ve posted on their site during the last year and two months.

[To click on links to our  STOP WHITE GENOCIDE messages that are currently on public display at the White House, click on the blue, animated "Stalwarts...first of the month" icon in the right hand margin of our pages]

Join the BUGS Team, and post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!


19 comments for “White House bans criticism of “HATE”

  1. December 23, 2013 at 4:18 pm

    Most White People are STUPID to see what is Happening to the White Race, Or they are scared someone will cry RACIST.!!

  2. December 23, 2013 at 5:59 pm

    Looks like we’re entering the next phase.

  3. Mindboggle
    December 23, 2013 at 7:59 pm

    Hey, What is the definition of hate? there are so many I have heard in my life. Does it mean expressing ill will or bad things to happen to another person or persons. Because if it does , that definition has nothing to do with this site that I have read. This site is concerned with preventing our white genocide & extinction by spreading the info. to make other whites informed that genocide & extinction are happening to us whites fast as soon as 10 years because after that time the majority of almost pure whites will be to old to reproduce. The hybrid whites will still be here but only for another 20-30 years then they will be gone also.

    • toppestofkek
      December 24, 2013 at 4:52 pm

      Right now hate pretty much means what liberals want it to mean

  4. Didge
    December 24, 2013 at 4:58 pm

    And to think some know it all clowns at BUGS, were giving Bob Whitaker argument, when he said the anti-White’s new word is “Hate”.

    I am seeing “Hate” everywhere now and yet the Mantra at BUGS still has, “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White” at the bottom.

    Better address it soon, as its getting away from us.

    • Henry Davenport
      December 24, 2013 at 6:18 pm

      Ironically, I think I was the main, or possibly the only, know-it-all “clown” who gave Bob argument then, but as best I recall I argued more against the idea that we have conquered the R-word than against the importance of “hate.” (And btw, I don’t know who you are, but I don’t know of any “clowns” at BUGS, and we don’t call each other that at BUGS, so don’t lay down that crap here either. If you’re a bugster, you need a lesson in group morale).

      • Henry Davenport
        December 24, 2013 at 6:28 pm

        We’ll probably have another petition on “hate” for February, and more to follow. I agree with Didge that we’re behind where we’d like to be in hitting it.

  5. DanFolzer
    December 24, 2013 at 8:47 pm

    The anti-whites will be made to lift their jack boots off the necks of our people.

  6. December 24, 2013 at 10:01 pm

    Excellent article! Yes, let’s attack them on this silly Hate front. They are just like children having a tantrum after hearing something they don’t agree with. Like a 3rd grader they stomp their foot and say “that’s Hate!”. If we point it out, it is obvious how pathetic it is.

  7. asgardian127
    December 24, 2013 at 11:01 pm

    Just imagine this.

    You are in a fight with a TITAN, for HOURS you are hitting the Titan left and right. He continues to Ignore you, then all of the sudden you poke him in the eye and he FLINCHES.

    That is what HD has done with the petitions, the noise has gotten so loud that they…they as in the WHITE HOUSE could no longer ignore it. He has made them flinch….we are no longer a “fringe” movement we are no longer a nuisance we are a PROBLEM….HD made them flinch he made them acknowledge us.

    Congratulations HD, we are one step closer in moving the rock known as a PUBLIC conversation about white genocide.

    The eye of sauroman lol has now tuned it’s attention to us…..steady yourselves men…and ladies.

    It’s not the BANNING that matters…it’s the acknowledgement.


    • December 25, 2013 at 1:19 pm

      Very lucid point Asgardian!

      When they are unable to respond to you, so they just attempt brute force banning, it means our message is WORKING!

      Great work HD!

      • asgardian127
        December 25, 2013 at 9:07 pm

        It can no longer be ignored.

        You can only take so many bee stings before you either run or attack.

        You may be able to tolerate a few but you can’t withstand hundreds, at that point you have to make a decision.

        They are getting to that point, they are either going to run or attack.

        Either way it only benefits our side of the debate….because WHEN this does go public normal white people will see that the othersides argument benefits them in no way whatsoever.

    • December 27, 2013 at 1:46 am

      That is a good one Asgardian! They react when we hit a nerve because that is a weak spot.

  8. Tom Bowie
    December 25, 2013 at 7:02 pm

    It is also interesting for me to take note of the fact that Facebook by way of it’s representatives (in particular Mayahuelalso) considers the White House Website (or at least the petition links) to be “Hate Speech”, “Bullying and Harassment”, “Threatening” and possibly provoking “Violence” as well as other undefined offences.

    Facebook couldn’t site any other links from what I could tell but the prevention of White Genocide is apparently a violation of Facebook Policy.

    • Henry Davenport
      December 27, 2013 at 9:43 am

      Lol on first paragraph, Tom. Do you have a link to that?

      Thanks to all of you who commented above. Honestly, based on my experience with the mods at a mainstream site I posted at forever, I think mainly that the petition was just worded a little too aggressively for the White House mods.

      But Bob shares the opinion of the rest of you. (He smilingly responded to my own theory, “Have you ever been to Washington?” He seemed uninterested in my 6th grade’s adventure climbing the Washington Monument)

      Anyway, we’re planning another “hate” petition for February that will take a slightly different tack, so we’ll see.

      There’s no doubt we’re getting increased attention now.

      • Henry Davenport
        December 27, 2013 at 10:25 am

        “Have you ever been to Washington?”

        Bob Whitaker is the ONLY pro-White “leader” who has experience wielding power by means of words in the very center of political power in the United States.

        And so at the last conference at the Smokey Mtns, what did the other “leaders” of the “White movement” discuss among themselves, when gathered privately in the evening?

        As proudly reported by the managing editor of the organization that sponsored the conference, they discussed “the coming [White] ethnostate,” thus imitating exactly the endless irrelevant musings of the “dream warriors” who post on that site and on most other White sites.

        Did it even occur to the “leaders” (no it did not!) to put aside fantasies of the future, and instead hammer out methods of opening up every White country’s national discourse to discussion of White Genocide???

        We are forcing our memes and phrases into the national discourse of every White country in the world, because as Bob has said many times re White Genocide, “We have to be allowed to talk about it.”

        • Henry Davenport
          December 27, 2013 at 6:04 pm

          I always feel like an ingrate after I criticize that particular organization, since doing the petitions would be a LOT harder without it.

          Like the White House petition site itself, that organization is an opportunity waiting to be used.

          • Didge
            December 27, 2013 at 7:01 pm

            “I always feel like an ingrate after I criticize that particular organization, since doing the petitions would be a LOT harder without it.”

            SF not an organization, its just a big website where people go to shoot the breeze and there are 10s of thousands of those all over the net. At least you have the strength of character to keep going back.

            “they discussed “the coming [White] ethnostate,”

            What I find sadly amusing is when dream warriors actually take their ventures out on the streets, to discover only 10-12 people ever show up. The reality of our situation must hit like ice water.

  9. badger
    January 1, 2014 at 2:04 pm

    If there is no truth in the claim of White Genocide, why ban it?

    Exploit their mistake.

Something on your mind? Have your say!