Adopting Leftist Tactics To Defeat The Left Subversive conservatism objects to …

Comment on White Genocide in USA by Jack Smith.

Adopting Leftist Tactics To Defeat The Left
Subversive conservatism objects to victories gained over the left by using tactics developed by the left. Conservatives claim that tactics are “owned by certain groups” and regardless of their utility, ‘”any who want to be conservatives are not allowed to use leftist tactics.” Conservatives especially do not want any whites to defeat the left, ever. We of the right wing use any tactic that works in this war against white genocide.
On Friday, the 16th of June 2017, in New York City, Laura Loomer of The Rebel Media raided the stage of the controversial quasi-Trump-killing ‘Shakespeare in the Park’ recreation of Julius Caeser. Once on stage, Loomer interrupted the play and yelled about the violent rhetoric that the play was implicitly portraying against Donald Trump and the political-right.
Moments after Loomer got on stage, another protestor named Jack Posobiec rose in the midst of the crowd and started comparing them to Nazi propagandists. In essence, it was an excellent use of the left’s own tactics against them, and it gave the left a taste of its own medicine. And, on Saturday, other protesters once again interrupted the play protesting the same issues.
Of course, in response to these events, the standard “respectable” conservatives responded with disgust. David French of National Review tweeted that “Anyone on the ‘right’ who defends the BS that went down at the play tonight (16 June 2017) is showing themselves to be tribalist, not conservative.”
Ben Shapiro, writing at the Daily Wire, called the incident “idiotic snowflake-ism” and argued that “…the right was in serious danger of capitulating to the left’s ‘hate speech’ argument by reversing it on the left.”
Reading statements like this, it soon becomes apparent why standard conservatives have failed to conserve much of anything—they are like France during World War II, or, at best, maybe Italy. In fact, when reading comments like those from Shapiro and French, one has to wonder whether these two conservatives, or other conservatives like them, have ever found themselves in a real physical confrontation.
The reason why this is doubtful is because anyone who has been in a one-of-one fight knows that when you are confronted with an existential threat, and if you fight by Queensbury rules while your enemy does not, then the chances are very good that you will lose that battle. Indeed, if a punk comes at you with a jagged bottle after throwing dirt in your eyes, and you are worried about hitting him below the belt with your gentlemanly “fisticuffs”, then you will likely leave that fight in a body bag, and he won’t.
Well, the left is a punk, and they have been coming at the right with a jagged bottle for some time now, so is it any surprise that some on the right have decided to start fighting dirty, just like the left does.
You don’t worry about boxing rules when this guy is coming at you with a meat cleaver !
Note as well that there is nothing necessarily immoral about escalating and fighting dirty if the situation calls for it. After all, even cops are allowed to use whatever tactics and force are necessary to subdue an attacker and keep the public safe so long as the force is proportionate to the attack and so long as the force used is in response to an attack.
Thus, if talking fails and a gangbanger pulls a gun on a cop, then it is completely moral for that cop to stop that threat using whatever type of lethal force tactic is necessary, be it shooting, stabbing, batoning, choking, or whatever. The key point is that the cop must stop the threat.
Even in larger-scale conflicts this idea of mutual escalation and proportionate tactical reaction has been understood as necessary. For example, in World War I, when the Germans started using large-scale chemical warfare, the Allies did not merely buck-up and carry-on as if the old rules still applied. No, they too started using chemical warfare until the other side learned from painful experience that enough was enough, and that the use of chemical warfare simply was not worth the cost.
Indeed, appeals to Germany’s better nature did not stop them from using chemical weapons. And principled arguments did not sway them either. No, only the pain and harm received from experiencing the same tactics that they used was sufficient to teach the Germans not to use chemical weapons again after the end of the First World War. Well, the same is true for the left today.
Principled appeals and rational arguments do not work with the left, as has been evidenced for years. But painful experience can change a leftist’s mind quite quickly; consider, for example, the fact that the Antifa thugs are not all that eager anymore to attack the right after receiving a thrashing in return for their troubles.
David French, conservative, said: Anyone on the “right” who defends the BS that went down at the play tonight (e.g. the victory over the left) is showing themselves to be white tribalists, not true conservatives.” Nothing is more damning to the image of conservatism than statements that “conservative” like French puke out. Conservatism has been a group of loosers and essentially pro-left for the past 50 years.
In World War 1, both sides used gas, but one side only did so in a self-defense response to the other, and that is a difference that makes all the difference.
At the same time, we should not be surprised by the fact that many leftists only learn from painful experience rather than from rational arguments. After all, over two thousand years ago, Aristotle, in his book Rhetoric, told us that some people are simply immune to rational argumentation and instruction, and that such people only learn by swaying their emotions and experiences.
Do we really think that so much has changed in human nature since Aristotle’s time that his point no longer holds true? Of course not. And not only was Aristotle correct, but the left actually epitomizes the type of individual that Aristotle was speaking of (although leftists will no doubt think the same of the right).
So, the point is that when in a war, and the culture war is a war (just a war that has avoided large-scale violence so far), you will almost certainly lose that war if you are unwilling to engage in the use of certain tactics that seem unpleasant and even dangerous to you when not in such a conflict. This is especially the case if those are the very tactics that the enemy finds most painful and effective against them.
And since the left loves to project, then this means that the tactics they use against the right are the ones most likely to be highly effective against them. Hence the need to use the left’s tactics against them.
It must also be remembered that the goal of using the enemy’s own tactics against them is not to rejoice at the damage that doing so causes to them, but rather to educate them through the only means that they learn from: namely, emotional pain. And this harsh education is meant to teach them that using the very tactics that they endorse is ultimately to no one’s benefit.
Thus, if the left stops its illiberal attacks, then so will the right. But if the left does not stop using such tactics, then neither will the right, and so there will be Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). However, better the madness of MAD—as well as the subsequent convulsing break-up of the United States into two different countries—then losing to the left.
After all, if the left does not backdown, even when faced with their own tactics being used against them in a trajectory of mutual destruction, then it is best to know this fact early, so that other measures, such as a push for secession, can get started in earnest.
In the end, it is true that sometimes, responding in kind to extreme brutality can be too heinous to contemplate, but losing a war to someone willing to be so brutal is even worse. For example, just consider what would have happened to the whole world had the United States, in the face of a Soviet nuclear arms race, decided to unilaterally disarm themselves of nuclear weapons after seeing the damage that nuclear weapons caused. Had this happened, North America would likely be a nuclear wasteland today, and everyone in Europe would be calling each other “comrade”.
Well, the left are the Soviets, and their tactics are the cultural nukes of today. Either the right starts to use those tactics in order to bring about a detente based on an understanding of mutually assured cultural and social destruction or else the right will lose. After all, the left has a grip on large swaths of the media, academia, corporations, the judiciary, and the government bureaucracy, not to mention a large voting base, so it is not as if the right has any major advantages in other areas.
Furthermore, as history attests, and as the last generation or so in the United States affirms, the large masses within the country will likely just sway and move with the cultural currents, simply absorbing and largely accepting the cultural changes that come their way from whichever side is stronger. As such, the masses, and the standard conservatives, will not be much help to the right on a day-to-day basis.
Had the West decided not to stockpile “evil” nukes, then Soviet soldiers would likely have marched right through Europe. So sometimes, MAD is the only way to go.
So, in light of all of the above, the right has a choice to make: either act like a “respectable” conservative and most likely lose the culture anyway—as they have been doing for the last few decades—or else fight in a manner that actually teaches the left the hard lesson that maybe we all need to stop such behaviors before we all destroy ourselves and our freedoms.

Jack Smith Also Commented

White Genocide in USA
The God Damned Facebook ass licking White Genocide bastards have suppressed my comments. Too cowardly to admit their lying, they simply say “You said that before.

God Damn this phony israeli site. It won’t be around much longer. But in the meantime its an abomination!


White Genocide in USA
Getting Away With Genocide
Twenty-five years after the overthrow of the Pol Pot regime, not one Khmer Rouge leader has stood in court to answer for their terrible crimes. Authors Tom Fawthrop and Helen Jarvis show how governments that often speak the language of human rights shielded the genocidal Cambodian monster Pol Pot and his lieutenants from prosecution during the 1980s. After communist Vietnam ousted the Khmer Rouge regime in 1979, the US and UK governments backed the Khmer Rouge at the UN, and approved the re-supply of Pol Pot’s extermination army in Thailand. In the late 1990s, the “forgotten genocide” became the subject of serious UN inquiry for the first time. Finally, in 2003, the UN and the Cambodian government agreed to hold a trial in Phnom Penh conducted jointly by international jurists and Cambodian lawyers and judges. Tom Fawthrop and Helen Jarvis reveal why it took 18 years for the UN to recognize the mass murder and crimes against humanity that took place under the Killing Fields regime. The US and UK want to use the Genocide model employed by the Cambodian Khmer Rouge, in order to genocide the white majorities in both countries and usher in an afro-moslem caliphate world. The UN, financed by the USA against the wishes of the white majority, has colluded with the US since the 1970s in protecting the US/UK genocide secrets.


White Genocide in USA
Pravda: American Capitalism Gone with a Whimper

How may of you saw the story in the English-language version of Pravda over the weekend? “American Capitalism Gone with a Whimper.” Listen to the lede, here:

“It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American decent into Marxism is happening with breathtaking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people. True, the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century, especially the past twenty years. The initial testing grounds was conducted upon our Holy Russia and a bloody test it was.

But we Russians would not just roll over and give up our freedoms and our souls, no matter how much money Wall Street poured into the fists of the Marxists. “Those lessons were taken and used to properly prepare the American populace for the surrender of their freedoms and souls, to the whims of their elites and betters. First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture, rather then the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas then (sic) the drama in DC that directly affects their lives. They care more for their ‘right’ to choke down a McDonalds (sic) burger or a BurgerKing (sic) burger than for their constitutional rights.”

Nobody ever called 911 when they lost a constitutional right, but they call 911 when they didn’t get their McNuggets. “Then they turn around and

lecture us about our rights and about our ‘democracy’” in Russia. “Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different ‘branches and denominations’ were for the most part little more then Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant mega preachers were more then happy to sell out their souls and flocks to be on the ‘winning’ side of one pseudo Marxist politician or another. Their flocks may complain, but when explained that they would be on the ‘winning’ side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes for earthly power.

Even our Holy Orthodox churches are scandalously liberalized in America,” meaning Russian Orthodox churches. “The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama. His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive. “His spending and money printing has been a record setting, not just in America’s short history but in the world. If this keeps up for more then another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Wiemar Republic (sic) and at worst Zimbabwe.

“These past two weeks have been the most breathtaking of all. First came the announcement of a planned redesign of the American Byzantine tax system, by the very thieves who used it to bankroll their thefts, loses and swindles of hundreds of billions of dollars. These make our Russian oligarchs look little more then ordinary street thugs, in comparison. Yes, the Americans have beat our own thieves in the shear volumes. Should we congratulate them?”


Recent Comments by Jack Smith

Hungarian Mayor says his village welcomes Western European refugees fleeing multiculturalism
CASE IN POINT:

MY COMMENTARY ENTITLED: CURRENT EVIDENCE OF MOSLEM INTELLECTUAL INFERIORITY


Hungarian Mayor says his village welcomes Western European refugees fleeing multiculturalism
i JUST LEARNED FROM TWO FORMER COMMENTERS ON THIS SUSPICIOUS SITE.

BOTH TOLD ME, IN ESSENCE,: “wHITE gENOCIDE SUPPRESSES YOUR RESEARCHED COMMENTARIES. THEY DELETED MINE TOO. THE BASTARDS ARE OUR ENEMIES IN DISGUISE. DON’T WASTE YOUR TIME. ”

I HAVE DECIDED TO TAKE THEIR ADVICE


Hungarian Mayor says his village welcomes Western European refugees fleeing multiculturalism
rOB cLAUSSDEN. sON OF MUD PEOPLE? OR A SCREEN NAME?

yOUR ADVICE IS WARPED BECAUSE YOU COMPLEMENTED THE EU !


Hungarian Mayor says his village welcomes Western European refugees fleeing multiculturalism
MOHAMMED DUG UP THE CORPSE OF HIS OWN MOTHER AND DEVOURED IT

mohammed WAS NOTHING MORE THAN AN INSANE, MENTALLY RETARDED MURDERER

IF ANY OF YOU WILL ONLY RESEARCH ISLAMIC HISTORY, COVERUPS AND KORANIC INSANITY, YOU WILL HAVE A LOT TO CONTRIBUTE TO THIS SITE.

ALSO RESEARCH THE INBRED NATURE OF MOSTLY RETARDED MOSLEMS

YOU WILL DISCOVER THAT AN AVERAGE IQ AMONG WHITE PEOPLE, IS CONSIDERED GENIUS IF A MOSLEM HAS IT.

RESEARCH COMPARISONS OF IQs OF WHITES VERSUS NIGROS AND MOSLEMS.

WHY DON’T ANY OF YOU RESEARCH OUR ENEMIES ?


Hungarian Mayor says his village welcomes Western European refugees fleeing multiculturalism
What’s this? Pat Kittle?

Another attempt to dilute white focus?

Can’t you present some real evidence of Israel-Moslem collusion?

No! because you are pro-moslem and therefore an enemy?

No! because you are a one-liner ignoramus. Too mentally bereft or too lazy to research before you post.

(1)Comments without verifiable EVIDENCE ARE USELESS.

(2) IRONICALLY, MOST OF MY RESOURCED (FACT VERIFIABLE) COMMENTS HAVE BEEN SUPPRESSED BY THIS SITE BECAUSE MY EVIDENCE THREATENED THE BODYGUARD OF LIES PROTECTING ISRAEL AND FACEBOOK.

(3) ASK WHITE GENOCIDE WHY?


Share

0 comments for “Adopting Leftist Tactics To Defeat The Left Subversive conservatism objects to …

  1. Bob "Cuckold" Ross
    November 23, 2016 at 6:45 am

    Hi, this is Bob Ross communicating from beyond the grave. I dedicated my life to painting so that you brats could do something more productive with your lives than sitting on your *** playing your stupid Atari games all day. I don’t appreciate you morons abusing my legacy and turning me into some childish meme that you can spam on your little MSM chat thing. Now go paint a mountain or something and don’t you dare copypaste this. CoolStoryBob

    View Comment
  2. Laetitis
    November 10, 2016 at 3:37 pm

    Will South Africans be welcome. We are being slaughtered. I am 61 European female

    View Comment
  3. Harumphty Dumpty
    January 4, 2012 at 3:45 pm

    This site is so needed, to awaken Whites from the dream of multicultural harmony that anti-Whites have implanted in them, and open their eyes to the nightmare reality that their dream has been a dream of White Genocide.

    This site is off to a great start!

    View Comment
    • September 2, 2017 at 8:58 pm

      Congratulations on a site that’s as important to our people as food and water (not to mention our own living space.
      I’m a man also of very strong opinions. Check me out: whiteaustralia.blogspot.com.au

      View Comment
  4. Turner
    January 1, 2012 at 9:33 pm

    Can’t wait

    View Comment