White Genocide in USA

White genocide in USA

Yes, America, as in the land space, had American Indian tribes living there before White people colonized it. But deliberately bringing in millions of non-White immigrants to change that is White genocide.

If anti-Whites cared one bit about American Indian tribes, they wouldn’t flood the USA with more immigrants. It does not help them at all.

In the past, Turkey and Morocco colonized Europe, but that does not mean Turkey and Morocco have to bow down and accept unlimited European immigration until they become majority White countries.

Most countries around the world have been colonized by other groups, but no one cares about that – and certainly no one tells them that they have to become a “nation of immigrants” – that’s because most of those places are full of non-White people.

In short, history is no excuse for genocide, but anti-Whites still insist that White Americans born today are personally responsible for crimes that happened centuries ago.

“Melting Pot”

It doesn’t matter what you or I call America. It is full of White people – try to change that and it’s genocide. Support this and you support genocide.

“Go Back to Europe!”

Anti-Whites tell White Americans to “go back to Europe” if they don’t like non-White immigration. However, in Europe, White people are told to “go to the Antarctic” if they don’t like non-White immigration.

This argument has nothing to do with the land that White people live on – it’s simply that White people live their, and White people have been labeled as a “problem”.

Whether it’s America, Canada, Australia, or Europe – the solution to the “White problem” is always “diversity” (non-White immigrants), and if you don’t like it, that’s too bad!

Demographics, shhhmemographics!

Anti-Whites call it a demographics change because they want to say that it’s our own fault. Meanwhile, they say things like this:

The key to solving the social problems of our age is to abolish the white race.” – Noel Ignatiev, a Harvard professor.

The Housing and Urban Development Department are mapping every US ZIP code, neighborhood, and block by its majority racial group. The New York Post explains zoning laws would be changed “to bring more low-income minorities into ‘white suburbs’.[source]

unitedstates

 

 

Share

215 comments for “White Genocide in USA

  1. man of color
    September 2, 2017 at 7:37 pm

    that’s so weird because the americas and australia not white areas (indians and aboriginal) both of em genocide like dogs by now they threatened species and you cry because few black immigration , well if you want your race to keep up you most be good in bed (higher fertilite rate ) i wont miss you mr sunburn LOL

    View Comment
    • Melanin Deficient Guy
      September 24, 2017 at 9:35 am

      The average American DNA is 77% European. Stock up on Sun block. American gets whiter by the day.
      Average European DNA via race
      Caucasian- 98%
      Black American- 21%
      Hispanic/Latino- 65%
      Average 77%
      We won’t miss our BBW white chicks

      View Comment
  2. /
    July 5, 2017 at 4:30 pm

    The God Damned Facebook ass licking White Genocide bastards have suppressed my comments. Too cowardly to admit their lying, they simply say “You said that before.

    God Damn this phony israeli site. It won’t be around much longer. But in the meantime its an abomination!

    View Comment
  3. Jack Smith
    July 2, 2017 at 4:54 pm

    Getting Away With Genocide
    Twenty-five years after the overthrow of the Pol Pot regime, not one Khmer Rouge leader has stood in court to answer for their terrible crimes. Authors Tom Fawthrop and Helen Jarvis show how governments that often speak the language of human rights shielded the genocidal Cambodian monster Pol Pot and his lieutenants from prosecution during the 1980s. After communist Vietnam ousted the Khmer Rouge regime in 1979, the US and UK governments backed the Khmer Rouge at the UN, and approved the re-supply of Pol Pot’s extermination army in Thailand. In the late 1990s, the “forgotten genocide” became the subject of serious UN inquiry for the first time. Finally, in 2003, the UN and the Cambodian government agreed to hold a trial in Phnom Penh conducted jointly by international jurists and Cambodian lawyers and judges. Tom Fawthrop and Helen Jarvis reveal why it took 18 years for the UN to recognize the mass murder and crimes against humanity that took place under the Killing Fields regime. The US and UK want to use the Genocide model employed by the Cambodian Khmer Rouge, in order to genocide the white majorities in both countries and usher in an afro-moslem caliphate world. The UN, financed by the USA against the wishes of the white majority, has colluded with the US since the 1970s in protecting the US/UK genocide secrets.

    View Comment
  4. Jack Smith
    June 30, 2017 at 7:32 am

    Pravda: American Capitalism Gone with a Whimper

    How may of you saw the story in the English-language version of Pravda over the weekend? “American Capitalism Gone with a Whimper.” Listen to the lede, here:

    “It must be said, that like the breaking of a great dam, the American decent into Marxism is happening with breathtaking speed, against the back drop of a passive, hapless sheeple, excuse me dear reader, I meant people. True, the situation has been well prepared on and off for the past century, especially the past twenty years. The initial testing grounds was conducted upon our Holy Russia and a bloody test it was.

    But we Russians would not just roll over and give up our freedoms and our souls, no matter how much money Wall Street poured into the fists of the Marxists. “Those lessons were taken and used to properly prepare the American populace for the surrender of their freedoms and souls, to the whims of their elites and betters. First, the population was dumbed down through a politicized and substandard education system based on pop culture, rather then the classics. Americans know more about their favorite TV dramas then (sic) the drama in DC that directly affects their lives. They care more for their ‘right’ to choke down a McDonalds (sic) burger or a BurgerKing (sic) burger than for their constitutional rights.”

    Nobody ever called 911 when they lost a constitutional right, but they call 911 when they didn’t get their McNuggets. “Then they turn around and

    lecture us about our rights and about our ‘democracy’” in Russia. “Then their faith in God was destroyed, until their churches, all tens of thousands of different ‘branches and denominations’ were for the most part little more then Sunday circuses and their televangelists and top protestant mega preachers were more then happy to sell out their souls and flocks to be on the ‘winning’ side of one pseudo Marxist politician or another. Their flocks may complain, but when explained that they would be on the ‘winning’ side, their flocks were ever so quick to reject Christ in hopes for earthly power.

    Even our Holy Orthodox churches are scandalously liberalized in America,” meaning Russian Orthodox churches. “The final collapse has come with the election of Barack Obama. His speed in the past three months has been truly impressive. “His spending and money printing has been a record setting, not just in America’s short history but in the world. If this keeps up for more then another year, and there is no sign that it will not, America at best will resemble the Wiemar Republic (sic) and at worst Zimbabwe.

    “These past two weeks have been the most breathtaking of all. First came the announcement of a planned redesign of the American Byzantine tax system, by the very thieves who used it to bankroll their thefts, loses and swindles of hundreds of billions of dollars. These make our Russian oligarchs look little more then ordinary street thugs, in comparison. Yes, the Americans have beat our own thieves in the shear volumes. Should we congratulate them?”

    View Comment
  5. Jack Smith
    June 26, 2017 at 10:02 pm

    Adapted from Mother Jones Propaganda Piece Praising the FBI
    Quazi Mohammad Nafis was a 21-year-old student living in Queens, New York, when the US government helped turn him into a terrorist.
    His transformation began on July 5, when Nafis, a Bangladeshi citizen who’d come to the United States on a student visa that January, shared aspirations with a man he believed he could trust. Nafis told this man in a phone call that he wanted to wage jihad in the United States, that he enjoyed reading Al Qaeda propaganda, and that he admired “Sheikh O,” or Osama bin Laden. Who this confidant was and how Nafis came to meet him remain unclear; what we know from public documents is that the man told Nafis he could introduce him to an Al Qaeda operative.
    It was a hot, sunny day in Central Park on July 24 when Nafis met with Kareem, who said he was with Al Qaeda. Nafis, who had a slight build, mop of black hair, and a feebly grown beard, told Kareem that he was “ready for action.”
    “What I really mean is that I don’t want something that’s, like, small,” Nafis said. “I just want something big. Something very big. Very, very, very, very big, that will shake the whole country.”
    Nafis said he wanted to bomb the New York Stock Exchange, and with help from his new Al Qaeda contact, he surveilled the iconic building at 11 Wall Street. “We are going to need a lot of TNT or dynamite,” Nafis told Kareem. But Nafis didn’t have any explosives, and, as court records indicate, he didn’t know anyone who could sell him explosives, let alone have the money to purchase such materials. His father, a banker in Bangladesh, had spent his entire life savings to send Nafis to the United States after his son, who was described to journalists as dim by people who knew him in his native country, had flunked out of North South University in Bangladesh.
    Kareem suggested they rent a storage facility to stash the material they’d need for a car bomb. He said he’d put up the money for it, and get the materials. Nafis dutifully agreed, and suggested a new target: the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Nafis later met Kareem at a storage facility, where Nafis poured the materials Kareem had brought into trash bins, believing he was creating a 1,000-pound car bomb that could level a city block.
    In truth, the stuff was inert. And Kareem was an undercover FBI agent, tipped off by the man who Nafis had believed was a confidant—an FBI informant. The FBI had secretly provided everything Nafis needed for his attack: not only the storage facility and supposed explosives, but also the detonator and the van that Nafis believed would deliver the bomb.
    On the morning of October 17, Nafis and Kareem drove the van to Lower Manhattan and parked it in front of the Federal Reserve Bank on Liberty Street. Then they walked to a nearby hotel room, where Nafis dialed on his cellphone the number he believed would trigger the bomb, but nothing happened. He dialed again, and again. The only result was Nafis’ apprehension by federal agents.
    “The defendant thought he was striking a blow to the American economy,” US Attorney Loretta E. Lynch said in a statement after the arrest. “At every turn, he was wrong, and his extensive efforts to strike at the heart of the nation’s financial system were foiled by effective law enforcement. We will use all of the tools at our disposal to stop any such attack before it can occur.”
    How many of these would-be terrorists would have acted were it not for an FBI agent provocateur helping them? Is it possible that the FBI is creating the very enemy we fear?
    Federal officials say they are protecting Americans with these operations—but from whom? Real terrorists, or dupes like Nafis, who appear unlikely to have the capacity for terrorism were it not for FBI agents providing the opportunity and means?
    Nafis is one of more than 150 men since 9/11 who have been caught in FBI terrorism stings, some of whom have received 25 years or more in prison. In these cases, the FBI uses one of its more than 15,000 registered informants—many of them criminals, others trying to stay in the country following immigration violations—to identify potential terrorists. It then provides the means necessary for these would-be terrorists to move forward with a plot—in some cases even planting specific ideas for attacks. The FBI now spends $3 billion on counterterrorism annually, the largest portion of its budget. Our nation’s top law enforcement agency, traditionally focused on investigating crimes after they occur, now operates more as an intelligence organization that tries to preempt crimes before they occur. But how many of these would-be terrorists would have acted were it not for an FBI agent provocateur helping them? Is it possible that the FBI is creating the very enemy we fear?
    Those are the questions I set out to explore beginning in 2010. With the help of a research assistant, I built a database of more than 500 terrorism prosecutions since 9/11, looking closely and critically at every terrorism case brought into federal courts during the past decade. We pored through thousands of pages of court records, and found that nearly half of all terrorism cases since 9/11 involved informants, many of them paid as much as $100,000 per assignment by the FBI. At the time of the story’s publication in Mother Jones in August 2011, 49 defendants had participated in plots led by an FBI agent provocateur, and that number has continued to rise since.
    Historically, media coverage of these operations—begun under George W. Bush and continuing apace under Barack Obama—was mostly uncritical. With their aggressive tactics essentially unknown to the public, the FBI and Justice Department controlled the narrative: another dangerous terrorist apprehended by vigilant federal agents!
    But in late 2011, the conversation began to shift. A couple of months after my story in Mother Jones and following the announcement of a far-fetched sting in which a Massachusetts man believed he’d been poised to destroy the US Capitol building using grenade-laden, remote-controlled airplanes, TPM Muckraker published a story headlined: “The Five Most Bizarre Terror Plots Hatched Under the FBI’s Watch.” Author David K. Shipler, in an April 2012 New York Times editorial, questioned the legitimacy of terrorism stings involving people who appeared to have no wherewithal to commit acts of terror: “Some threats are real, others less so. In terrorism, it’s not easy to tell the difference.” Stories in other major news outlets followed suit, and by October 2012, a post in Foreign Policy was asking: “How many idiot jihadis can the FBI fool?”
    Which brings us back to Nafis. “The case appears to be the latest to fit a model in which, in the process of flushing out people they believe present a risk of terrorism, federal law enforcement officials have played the role of enabler,” reported the New York Times, after the Justice Department announced Nafis’ arrest. “Though these operations have almost always held up in court, they have come under increasing criticism from those who believe that many of the subjects, even some who openly espoused violence, would have been unable to execute such plots without substantial assistance from the government.”
    In the years since the attacks of September 11, 2001, the federal law enforcement profile of a terrorist has changed dramatically. The men responsible for downing the World Trade Center were disciplined and patient; they were also living and training in the United States with money from an Al Qaeda cell led by Kuwaiti-born Khalid Sheikh Mohammad. In the days and weeks following 9/11, federal officials anxiously awaited a second wave of attacks, which would be launched, they believed at the time, by several sleeper cells around the country.
    Anwar al-Awlaki, a US-born, high-ranking Al Qaeda official became something of the terrorist group’s Dear Abby. Have a question about Islam? Ask Anwar!
    But the feared second wave never crashed ashore. Instead, the United States and allied nations invaded Afghanistan, Al Qaeda’s home base, and forced Osama bin Laden and his deputies into hiding. Bruised and hunted, Al Qaeda no longer had the capability to train terrorists and send them to the United States.
    In response, Al Qaeda’s leaders moved to what FBI officials describe as a “franchise model.” If you can’t run Al Qaeda as a hierarchal, centrally organized outfit, the theory went, run it as a franchise. In other words, export ideas—not terrorists. Al Qaeda and its affiliated organizations went online, setting up websites and forums dedicated to instilling their beliefs in disenfranchised Muslims already living in Western nations. A slickly designed magazine, appropriately titled Inspire, quickly followed. Article headlines included “I Am Proud to Be a Traitor to America,” and “Why Did I Choose Al-Qaeda?”
    Anwar al-Awlaki, the American-born, high-ranking Al Qaeda official who was killed in a US drone strike in Yemen on September 30, 2011, became something of the terrorist group’s Dear Abby. Have a question about Islam? Ask Anwar! Muslim men in nations throughout the Western world would email him questions, and Awlaki would reply dutifully, and in English, encouraging many of his electronic pen pals to violent action. Awlaki also kept a blog and a Facebook page, and regularly posted recruitment videos to YouTube. He said in one video:
    I specifically invite the youth to either fight in the West or join their brothers in the fronts of jihad: Afghanistan, Iraq, and Somalia. I invite them to join us in our new front, Yemen, the base from which the great jihad of the Arabian Peninsula will begin, the base from which the greatest army of Islam will march forth.
    Al Qaeda’s move to a franchise model met with some success. US Army Major Nadal Hassan, for example, corresponded with Awlaki before he killed 13 people and wounded 29 others in the Fort Hood shootings in 2009. Antonio Martinez, a Baltimore man and recent convert to Islam who was sentenced to 25 years in prison for trying to bomb a military recruiting office, sent Awlaki messages and watched Al Qaeda propaganda videos online before getting wrapped up in an FBI sting operation.
    The FBI has a term for Nafis, Martinez, and other alleged terrorists like them: lone wolf. Officials at the Bureau now believe that the next terrorist attack will likely come from a lone wolf, and this belief is at the core of a federal law enforcement policy known variously as preemption, prevention, and disruption. FBI counterterrorism agents want to catch terrorists before they act, and to accomplish this, federal law enforcement officials have in the decade since 9/11 created the largest domestic spying network ever to exist in the United States.
    In fact, the FBI today has 10 times as many informants as it did in the 1960s, when former FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover made the Bureau infamous for inserting spies into organizations as varied as Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King’s and the Ku Klux Klan. Modern FBI informants aren’t burrowing into political groups, however; they are focused on identifying today the terrorist of tomorrow. US government officials acknowledge that while terrorist threats do exist from domestic organizations, such as white supremacist groups and the sovereign citizen movement, they believe the greatest threat comes from within American Muslim communities.
    The FBI’s vast army of spies, located today in every community in the United States with enough Muslims to support a mosque, has one primary function: identify the next lone wolf, likely to be a single male age 16 to 35, according to the Bureau. Informants and their FBI handlers are on the lookout for young Muslims who espouse radical beliefs, are vocal about their disapproval of American foreign policy, or have expressed sympathy for international terrorist groups. If they find anyone who meets the criteria, they move him to the next stage: the sting operation.
    The terrorism sting operations are an evolution of an FBI tactic that has long captured the imaginations of Hollywood filmmakers: undercover drug busts.
    On a cold February morning in 2011, I met with Peter Ahearn, a retired FBI special agent who directed the Western New York Joint Terrorism Task Force, in a coffee shop outside Washington, DC, to talk about how the FBI runs its sting operations. Ahearn was in the bureau’s vanguard as it transformed into a counterterrorism organization in the wake of 9/11. An average-built man with a small dimple on his chin and close-cropped brown hair receding in the front, Ahearn oversaw one of the earliest post-9/11 terrorism investigations, involving the so-called Lackawanna Six—a group of six Yemeni American men living outside Buffalo, New York, who attended a training camp in Afghanistan and were convicted of providing material support to Al Qaeda. “If you’re doing a sting right, you’re offering the target multiple chances to back out,” Ahearn told me. “Real people don’t say, ‘Yeah, let’s go bomb that place.’ Real people call the cops.”
    Indeed, while terrorism sting operations are a new practice for the bureau, they are an evolution of an FBI tactic that has for decades captured the imaginations of Hollywood filmmakers. In 1982, as the illegal drug trade overwhelmed local police resources nationwide and funded an increase in violent crime, President Ronald Reagan’s first attorney general, William French Smith, gave the FBI jurisdiction over federal drug crimes, which previously had been the exclusive domain of the US Drug Enforcement Administration. Eager to show up their DEA rivals, FBI agents began aggressively sending undercover agents into America’s cities. This was relatively new territory for the FBI, which during Hoover’s 37-year stewardship had mandated that agents wear a suit and tie at all times, federal law enforcement badge easily accessible from the coat pocket. But an increasingly powerful Mafia and the bloody drug war forced the FBI to begin enforcing federal laws from the street level. In searching for drug crimes, FBI agents hunted sellers as well as buyers, and soon learned one of the best strategies was to become part of the action.
    At its most cliché, the Hollywood version of this scene is set in a Miami high-rise apartment, its floor-to-ceiling windows overlooking the cresting waves of the Atlantic Ocean. There’s a man seated at the dining table; he’s longhaired, with a scruffy face, and he has a briefcase next to him. Hidden on the other side of the room is a grainy black-and-white camera recording the entire scene. The apartment’s door swings open and two men saunter in, the camera recording their every move and word. The two men hand over bundles of cash, and the scruffy man then hands over the briefcase. But instead of finding pounds of cocaine inside it, the two guests are shocked to find the briefcase is empty—and then FBI agents rush in, guns drawn for the takedown.
    Federal law enforcement officials call this type of sting operation a “no-dope bust,” and its the direct predecessor to today’s terrorism sting. Instead of empty briefcases, the FBI today uses inert bombs and disabled assault rifles (and now that counterterrorism is the bureau’s top priority, the investigation of major drug crimes has largely fallen back to the DEA). While the assumptions behind both types of stings are similar, there is a fundamental flaw as applied to terrorism stings. In drug stings, federal law enforcement officials assume that any buyer caught in a sting would have been able to buy or sell drugs elsewhere had they not fallen into the FBI trap. The numbers support this assumption. In 2010, the most recent year for which data is available, the DEA seized 29,179 kilograms, or 64,328 pounds, of cocaine in the United States.
    In terrorism stings, however, federal law enforcement officials assume that any would-be terrorists caught would have been able to acquire the means elsewhere to carry out their violent plans had they not been ensnared by the FBI. The problem with this assumption is that no data exists to support it—and in fact what data is available often suggests the opposite.
    Few of the more than 150 defendants indicted and convicted this way since 9/11 had any connection to terrorists, evidence showed, and those that did have connections, however tangential, lacked the capacity to launch attacks on their own. Of the more that 150 defendants, an FBI informant not only led one of every three terrorist plots, but also provided all the necessary weapons, money, and transportation.
    The informant goaded them on the whole time, encouraging the pair with lines like: “We will teach these bastards a good lesson.” For his work on the case, he received $100,000 from the FBI.
    The FBI’s logic to support the use of terrorism stings goes something like this: By catching a lone wolf before he strikes, federal law enforcement can take him off the streets before he meets a real terrorist who can provide him with weapons and munitions. However, to this day, no example exists of a lone wolf, by himself unable to launch an attack, becoming operational through meeting an actual terrorist in the United States. In the terrorism sting operations since 9/11, the would-be terrorists are usually uneducated, unsophisticated, and economically desperate—not the attributes for someone likely to plan and launch a sophisticated, violent attack without significant help.
    This isn’t to say there have not been deadly and potentially deadly terrorist attacks and threats in the United States since 9/11. Hesham Mohamed Hadayet, an Egyptian, opened fire on the El-Al ticket counter at Los Angeles International Airport on July 4, 2002, killing two and wounding four. Afghan American Najibullah Zazi, who trained with Al Qaeda in Pakistan in 2008, came close to attacking the New York City subway system in September 2009, with a plan to place backpack bombs on crowded trains coming to and from Grand Central and Times Square stations. Faisal Shahzad, who trained with terrorists in the tribal regions of Pakistan, attempted but failed to detonate a crude car bomb in Times Square on May 1, 2010. While all three were dangerous lone wolves, none fit the profile of would-be terrorists targeted today in FBI terrorism sting operations. Unlike those caught in FBI stings, these three terrorists had international connections and the ability to carry out attacks on their own, however unsuccessful those attacks might have been for Zazi and Shahzad.
    By contrast, consider another New York City terrorism conspiracy—the so-called Herald Square bomb plot. Shahawar Matin Siraj, a 22-year-old Pakistani American, struck up a friendship with a seemingly elderly and knowledgeable Islamic scholar named Dawadi at his uncle’s Islamic Books and Tapes shop in Brooklyn. Dawadi was an FBI informant, Osama Eldawoody, who was put on the government payroll in September 2003 to stoke Siraj’s extremist inclinations. Siraj asked if Eldawoody could help him build a nuclear weapon and volunteered that he and a friend, James Elshafay, wanted to detonate a car bomb on one of New York’s bridges. “He’s a terrorist. He wants to harm the country and the people of the country. That’s what I thought immediately,” Eldawoody said in court testimony.
    Siraj introduced Dawadi to Elshafay, who had drawn schematics of police stations and bridges on napkins with the hopes of plotting a terrorist attack. Elshafay’s crude drawings prompted Siraj to hatch a new plan that involved the three men, Dawadi’s supposed international connections, and an attack on New York’s Herald Square subway station. The two young men discussed how they’d grown to hate the United States for invading Iraq and torturing prisoners. In Eldawoody’s car, the three of them talked about carrying 20- to 30-pound backpack bombs into the Herald Square subway station and leaving them on the train platform. Their conversations were recorded from a secret camera in the car’s dashboard. From April to August 2004, the men considered targets, surveilled the subway, checked security, and drew diagrams of the station. The informant goaded them on the whole time, encouraging the pair with lines like: “We will teach these bastards a good lesson.” For his work on the case, Eldawoody received $100,000 from the FBI.
    The evidence from the sting was enough to win convictions, and Siraj was sentenced to 30 years in prison and Elshafay 5 years. But it was also clear from the trial that Siraj was a dimwitted social recluse—a mother’s boy with little capacity to steal a car on his own, let alone bomb a subway station as part of a spectacular terrorist attack. In fact, Siraj was recorded during the sting operation as saying: “Everyone thinks I’m stupid.”
    The question underlying the Herald Square case can be asked in dozens of other similar sting operations: Could the defendants have become terrorists had they never met the FBI informant? The answer haunts Martin Stolar, the lawyer who represented Siraj at trial and fully expected to win an acquittal through an entrapment defense. “The problem with the cases we’re talking about is that defendants would not have done anything if not kicked in the ass by government agents,” Stolar said. “They’re creating crimes to solve crimes so they can claim a victory in the war on terror.”
    The practice is only growing. Though developed under the Bush administration, terrorism stings have become even more common under President Obama. While the Bush administration used terrorism stings to its greatest degree in 2006 and 2007—60 defendants were prosecuted and convicted from terrorism stings during those two years—the Justice Department began to shy away from the practice toward the end of Bush’s second term in office. In 2008, Bush’s last year as president, the US didn’t prosecute anyone from a terrorism sting.
    to the highest standards of professional conduct, integrity, and fairness.”
    Today, federal prosecutors announce arrests from terrorism stings at a rate of about one every 60 days, suggesting either that there are a lot of ineffective terrorists in the United States, or that the FBI has become effective at creating the very enemy it is hunting. Both conclusions are fraudulent FBI disinformation claims.
    The FBI is pro-moslem and all of its programs are designed to:
     suppress evidence of Islamic terror,
     prevent identification of Moslem terrorist rings (there are almost no lone wolf Islamic terrorists)
     Identify white citizens and organizations that attempt to resist Moslem terrorism
     Liquidate white citizens capable of defending themselves against Moslem terror
     Distract attention away from Moslem terrorists and towards nonexistent white terrorism
     Spy on foreign and domestic US antiterror operations and sabotage them if possible
     Coordinate cooperation with foreign terrorist cells outside of CONUS
     Constantly pressure the US military and all counter terror efforts to treat Islamic terrorists like US citizens and give them all the legal rights of US citizens even including the Miranda warning.
     Utilize bureaucratic red tape to slow down, negate, and over price long term Islamic terrorist trials

    View Comment
  6. Jack Smith
    June 26, 2017 at 5:45 am

    Helpers Wanted
    We are looking for voluntary Helpers with Idealism. People who want to help counter political correctness, spread the truth about immigration, political InCorrectness, Race Realism.
    German: Helfer, freiwillige Mitarbeiter gesucht

    Idealists who want to make a difference
    We want Idealists who do this as a work of love. Who are against political correctness, for race realism, concerned about immigration, quotas, Main Stream Media lies. Basically, the only pay is the satisfaction to work for a great project to help inform the world, to try to make a difference. In exceptional circumstances we might consider a small financial contribution to a motivated, hard working helper in financial distress.
    Anything from “consultants” who occasionally answer short specialized questions to people who can dedicate larger amounts of time. We have marked the most important skills, the most time consuming jobs.
    Kontaktform is broken
    To contact us please email to npi [at] pc2 [dot] rip. Yes this domain really exists. Or comment below on the disqus board.
    Share
    ShareFacebookTwitterGoogle+LinkedInRedditEmailGoogle GmailPocketWhatsApp
    Helpers with these skills needed
    German Translations
    into (and rarely from) German. Native German speakers would be great. We would love to translate entire articles from VDARE for example.
    Writing
    Citation and research. Help to prove all our statements, find citations, sources, proof
    Proof reading: find bugs and mistakes
    Journalist writing: improve on our writing quality
    Writing entire articles. Work on racismwiki.org
    Spreading propaganda
    Social media propaganda on reddit, Facebook, comments, …
    SEO Search Engine Optimization
    Contact with other relevant web sites, bloggers, activists, famous writers, etc.
    Technical: Computers and Internet,
    HTML, CSS,
    Wikimedia, WordPress, ..
    Writing in Windows, Microsoft Expression Web, Live Writer, plugins, etc.
    Web server, LAMP, Unix, FreeBSD
    Disqus discussion board moderation
    Graphics
    Cartoonists to illustrate topics. We have ideas how to make the cartoons but cannot draw ,
    graphic illustrators, photo processing
    avoid legal problems, use public domain, own production
    Legal:
    European and international hate speech laws. How to avoid to unnecessarily run afoul of hate speech laws. Disclaimers!
    Internet law, fair use,
    Organizer: if we really find a bunch of helpers, someone might coordinate helpers.

    1) Translators
    There are many articles, book reviews, book excerpts in English that deserve to be accessed in German. If you write good German, can use google translate and then fix the clumsy translation, you might do it. Lots of work to do.
    2) Writing, Citation and Research
    We are scientists and researchers. We don’t want to write gossip articles. Rather we want to meticulously document every simple statement we make.
    Find links to prove statements, find the most prestigious main stream media, government statistic or original research citations.
    Citations: Find quotes, articles, links, original sources, original research, original government statistics. This usually involves a bit of Googling, reading a few articles, following a few links. We want to have everything very well documented, and that is hard work and hampers efficient writing.
    “Encyclopedias”: You just know all about political correctness, race realism, etc. Thus you can easily find sources to prove statements, answer questions, ….
    Scientific skills in statistics, scientific methodology a plus.
    Proof readers: people who can pick up errors, correct mistakes.
    Journalists. You have such great writing skills. You can greatly improve on the text, make them nicer and better, but within the parameters set by us.
    You can write entire articles about topics we suggest or even you suggest.
    3) Social Media Propaganda
    You understand the topics and enjoy discussing it in social media. Reddit, Facebook, digg, tumbler. You post to message boards by friendly sites like Amren, etc. You don’t just blindly spam, rather know to spread the sites’ news in places and ways that are welcome.

    4) Computer consultants
    Needed for troubleshooting, asking questions, deciding on plugins, securing server against attacks, ….
    LAMP (Linux, Apache, MYSQL): some server adjustments, server security against attacks. Regular expressions.
    Windows, Windows live writer troubleshooting, plugins
    Expression Web 4
    SEO: search machine optimization! Really important.

    Helpers needed to research, translate, do social networking propaganda for Fluechtling.net and a few immigration critical and race realism sites. Please tweet and otherwise advertise this request linking to http://fluechtling.net/help/ (Fluechtling is German for “refugee”). German: fluechtling.net/hilfe/
    Helpers needed to research, translate, do social networking propaganda for Fluechtling.net and a few immigration critical and race realism sites.. Please tweet and otherwise advertise this request linking to fluechtling.net/help/ . German: fluechtling.net/hilfe/ (Fluechtling is German for “refugee”).

    View Comment
  7. Jack Smith
    June 24, 2017 at 6:20 pm

    Adopting Leftist Tactics To Defeat The Left
    Subversive conservatism objects to victories gained over the left by using tactics developed by the left. Conservatives claim that tactics are “owned by certain groups” and regardless of their utility, ‘”any who want to be conservatives are not allowed to use leftist tactics.” Conservatives especially do not want any whites to defeat the left, ever. We of the right wing use any tactic that works in this war against white genocide.
    On Friday, the 16th of June 2017, in New York City, Laura Loomer of The Rebel Media raided the stage of the controversial quasi-Trump-killing ‘Shakespeare in the Park’ recreation of Julius Caeser. Once on stage, Loomer interrupted the play and yelled about the violent rhetoric that the play was implicitly portraying against Donald Trump and the political-right.
    Moments after Loomer got on stage, another protestor named Jack Posobiec rose in the midst of the crowd and started comparing them to Nazi propagandists. In essence, it was an excellent use of the left’s own tactics against them, and it gave the left a taste of its own medicine. And, on Saturday, other protesters once again interrupted the play protesting the same issues.
    Of course, in response to these events, the standard “respectable” conservatives responded with disgust. David French of National Review tweeted that “Anyone on the ‘right’ who defends the BS that went down at the play tonight (16 June 2017) is showing themselves to be tribalist, not conservative.”
    Ben Shapiro, writing at the Daily Wire, called the incident “idiotic snowflake-ism” and argued that “…the right was in serious danger of capitulating to the left’s ‘hate speech’ argument by reversing it on the left.”
    Reading statements like this, it soon becomes apparent why standard conservatives have failed to conserve much of anything—they are like France during World War II, or, at best, maybe Italy. In fact, when reading comments like those from Shapiro and French, one has to wonder whether these two conservatives, or other conservatives like them, have ever found themselves in a real physical confrontation.
    The reason why this is doubtful is because anyone who has been in a one-of-one fight knows that when you are confronted with an existential threat, and if you fight by Queensbury rules while your enemy does not, then the chances are very good that you will lose that battle. Indeed, if a punk comes at you with a jagged bottle after throwing dirt in your eyes, and you are worried about hitting him below the belt with your gentlemanly “fisticuffs”, then you will likely leave that fight in a body bag, and he won’t.
    Well, the left is a punk, and they have been coming at the right with a jagged bottle for some time now, so is it any surprise that some on the right have decided to start fighting dirty, just like the left does.
    You don’t worry about boxing rules when this guy is coming at you with a meat cleaver !
    Note as well that there is nothing necessarily immoral about escalating and fighting dirty if the situation calls for it. After all, even cops are allowed to use whatever tactics and force are necessary to subdue an attacker and keep the public safe so long as the force is proportionate to the attack and so long as the force used is in response to an attack.
    Thus, if talking fails and a gangbanger pulls a gun on a cop, then it is completely moral for that cop to stop that threat using whatever type of lethal force tactic is necessary, be it shooting, stabbing, batoning, choking, or whatever. The key point is that the cop must stop the threat.
    Even in larger-scale conflicts this idea of mutual escalation and proportionate tactical reaction has been understood as necessary. For example, in World War I, when the Germans started using large-scale chemical warfare, the Allies did not merely buck-up and carry-on as if the old rules still applied. No, they too started using chemical warfare until the other side learned from painful experience that enough was enough, and that the use of chemical warfare simply was not worth the cost.
    Indeed, appeals to Germany’s better nature did not stop them from using chemical weapons. And principled arguments did not sway them either. No, only the pain and harm received from experiencing the same tactics that they used was sufficient to teach the Germans not to use chemical weapons again after the end of the First World War. Well, the same is true for the left today.
    Principled appeals and rational arguments do not work with the left, as has been evidenced for years. But painful experience can change a leftist’s mind quite quickly; consider, for example, the fact that the Antifa thugs are not all that eager anymore to attack the right after receiving a thrashing in return for their troubles.
    David French, conservative, said: Anyone on the “right” who defends the BS that went down at the play tonight (e.g. the victory over the left) is showing themselves to be white tribalists, not true conservatives.” Nothing is more damning to the image of conservatism than statements that “conservative” like French puke out. Conservatism has been a group of loosers and essentially pro-left for the past 50 years.
    In World War 1, both sides used gas, but one side only did so in a self-defense response to the other, and that is a difference that makes all the difference.
    At the same time, we should not be surprised by the fact that many leftists only learn from painful experience rather than from rational arguments. After all, over two thousand years ago, Aristotle, in his book Rhetoric, told us that some people are simply immune to rational argumentation and instruction, and that such people only learn by swaying their emotions and experiences.
    Do we really think that so much has changed in human nature since Aristotle’s time that his point no longer holds true? Of course not. And not only was Aristotle correct, but the left actually epitomizes the type of individual that Aristotle was speaking of (although leftists will no doubt think the same of the right).
    So, the point is that when in a war, and the culture war is a war (just a war that has avoided large-scale violence so far), you will almost certainly lose that war if you are unwilling to engage in the use of certain tactics that seem unpleasant and even dangerous to you when not in such a conflict. This is especially the case if those are the very tactics that the enemy finds most painful and effective against them.
    And since the left loves to project, then this means that the tactics they use against the right are the ones most likely to be highly effective against them. Hence the need to use the left’s tactics against them.
    It must also be remembered that the goal of using the enemy’s own tactics against them is not to rejoice at the damage that doing so causes to them, but rather to educate them through the only means that they learn from: namely, emotional pain. And this harsh education is meant to teach them that using the very tactics that they endorse is ultimately to no one’s benefit.
    Thus, if the left stops its illiberal attacks, then so will the right. But if the left does not stop using such tactics, then neither will the right, and so there will be Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD). However, better the madness of MAD—as well as the subsequent convulsing break-up of the United States into two different countries—then losing to the left.
    After all, if the left does not backdown, even when faced with their own tactics being used against them in a trajectory of mutual destruction, then it is best to know this fact early, so that other measures, such as a push for secession, can get started in earnest.
    In the end, it is true that sometimes, responding in kind to extreme brutality can be too heinous to contemplate, but losing a war to someone willing to be so brutal is even worse. For example, just consider what would have happened to the whole world had the United States, in the face of a Soviet nuclear arms race, decided to unilaterally disarm themselves of nuclear weapons after seeing the damage that nuclear weapons caused. Had this happened, North America would likely be a nuclear wasteland today, and everyone in Europe would be calling each other “comrade”.
    Well, the left are the Soviets, and their tactics are the cultural nukes of today. Either the right starts to use those tactics in order to bring about a detente based on an understanding of mutually assured cultural and social destruction or else the right will lose. After all, the left has a grip on large swaths of the media, academia, corporations, the judiciary, and the government bureaucracy, not to mention a large voting base, so it is not as if the right has any major advantages in other areas.
    Furthermore, as history attests, and as the last generation or so in the United States affirms, the large masses within the country will likely just sway and move with the cultural currents, simply absorbing and largely accepting the cultural changes that come their way from whichever side is stronger. As such, the masses, and the standard conservatives, will not be much help to the right on a day-to-day basis.
    Had the West decided not to stockpile “evil” nukes, then Soviet soldiers would likely have marched right through Europe. So sometimes, MAD is the only way to go.
    So, in light of all of the above, the right has a choice to make: either act like a “respectable” conservative and most likely lose the culture anyway—as they have been doing for the last few decades—or else fight in a manner that actually teaches the left the hard lesson that maybe we all need to stop such behaviors before we all destroy ourselves and our freedoms.

    View Comment
  8. Jack Smith
    June 23, 2017 at 5:59 am

    Two Unique Tactics for Winning the War Against White Men
    We have no choice but to participate in narrative warfare, not for our physical survival, but to preserve the rights, due process, and activities that men were able to do freely not more than two generations ago. We need to
    -refine our memes.
    -optimize our talking points.
    – take media appearances more seriously .
    -recruit and convert men to stop being swallowed up by the enemy, because they will not stop.
    They will criminalize normal masculine behavior, degrade the feminine so the very idea of beauty is destroyed, and ruin countries that were once good places for men to live in.
    We will be able to make a difference, not just for our children but for ourselves, so that we are not the victim of legal or mob action tomorrow for something we are allowed to do today. We shall always seek to pursue truth and virtue, but war we must fight, because it won’t stop fighting us.
    It’s probably obvious to you that our enemy had a bad 2016. Feminists, media stooges, and their totalitarian liberal buddies were on the ropes for much of the year and for the first time had to play defense to their delusional and incorrect beliefs.
    One of the reasons they’ve been successful up to now is that they pretended to be moderate. They simply preached the idea of “equality” and the cessation of violence against women. What monster would be against that?
    But now many moderates are finding out that they wanted much more than equality. They have pursued censorship and hate while advocating for the removal of due process for men and their marginalization in order to make them second-class citizens. As they’ve made rapid gains over the past few years, their cry for equality has been rightly outed as a anti-man movement.
    Since moderates tend to be reasonable—perhaps foolishly so—in that they want to hear both sides of the story before making a decision, I believe they can be convinced of our correct views if we pursue the following two tactics:
    1. Label the enemy mentally insane
    Once a moderate finds out that they are being pressured by someone who has a host of psychiatric disorders, they are less inclined to believe them. This will be easy to do since the enemy has adopted trans-sexuality as their pet cause.
    Let’s be clear that trans-sexuality is not being biologically born with mutated sex parts from two sexes like a hermaphrodite. A transsexual is someone who was biologically born with one sex but feels they are another. This is a legitimate psychiatric disorder, one of the most severe you can have, because it increases your rate for drug addiction and suicide while leading to irreversible surgical changes to your body that leave you as neither man nor woman.
    The American Psychiatric Association, however, has stopped calling it a disorder for the sole reason to “reduce stigma,” a political decision that does not change the fact that transsexuals are grossly ill, exhibiting a behavioral pattern that you simply don’t see in non-humans. The fact that narcissism is labeled a disorder while transsexualism is not should clue you in to how science is no longer being used in the APA.
    You can make the argument that some homosexual behavior is found in the wild, especially in primates, but have you ever heard of an animal biting off its penis because it wanted a vagina instead? Yet they are letting transsexuals and those who support them dictate policy that affects sane men while trying to normalize their deranged behavior. You must call it out for what it is.
    Laci Green, a prominent Youtube feminist who suffered from suicidal ideation and had to be given medication so she wouldn’t end her life, shows that most of these people are mentally sick in some way, with a host of serious personal demons that preclude them from coming up with public policies or mandates when they can’t even take care of themselves without popping pharmaceuticals or mutilating themselves. Take your pick from this list—they likely have more than one conditon:
    Antisocial Personality Disorder – irritability and aggressiveness, failure to conform to social norms, consistent irresponsibility
    Anxiety Disorder – fear and confusion, inability to relax, constant worry
    Borderline Personality Disorder – identity disturbance, emotional instability, feelings of emptiness, inappropriate and intense anger
    Depression – feeling sad and depressed, not being able to experience pleasure
    Female Sexual Arousal Disorder – inadequate production of vaginal lubrication during sex
    Histrionic Personal Disorder – attention-seeking behavior, extreme emotionality
    Narcissistic Personality Disorder – need for admiration, lack of empathy towards others, disdainful attitude
    Obsessive Compulsive Disorders – disturbing, recurrent, and uncontrollable thoughts
    Panic Disorder – feelings of terror
    People with mental disorders should get the treatment and medication they need (at their own expense) instead of trying to change the world into their image by legitimizing and normalizing their frightful psychoses.
    2. Show how women are consistent liars who can’t be trusted
    Women are critically involved in the war against white men. We’ve long known that women are essentially overgrown children who are unable to take care of themselves or act in moral and virtuous manner when not properly influenced by a male figure. Even a dog, when let loose from its master, does not begin to go on a rampage of destruction like women do when released from their traditional role.
    When left to their own devices, their true nature implores them to pursue base behaviors of narcissism, attention whoring, deceit, backstabbing, cheating, manipulation, status-seeking, golddigging, and violence against men. These qualities prevent her from being a loyal wife, fit mother, or even a barely informed citizen who knows more about geopolitical issues of the day than which celebrity is fucking who.
    Give a girl the “empowerment” and “independence” to go to university and she’ll pop out four years later with a million selfies on her smartphone and a notch count of at least 20 while being unable to come up with one good idea to advance civilization in a way that men have been doing for centuries. Without male guidance, a woman becomes useless in her natural motherly role.
    This fact is important when dealing with today’s rape hysteria. We must make it clear to moderates that women are liars who have been proven to lie in the past and who will continue to use lies against men for their own personal gain. Once the legitimacy of a woman’s word is undermined, moderates will no longer stand by while their preach their myths of rape culture, patriarchy, and the unequal wage gap. They will be skeptical and treat women as they ought to be treated.
    Whenever a woman alleges rape, tell your confused friend the following: “Women have lied in the past about rape, such as with Brian Banks, the Duke Lacrosse team, and also with the recent UVA hoax. Without clear evidence that can be used in a court of law, we must remain skeptical.” Clearly show how women behave in a way to maximize their attention and validation for personal benefit while shaming, disparaging, and denouncing innocent men that have done no wrong. Call out bogus “1 in 4 women have been sexually assaulted” studies whenever you see them by highlighting methodology so flawed that it would offend even a Haitian voodoo priest.
    The key word is “skepticism.” Once you get people in the habit of being skeptical of any claim by a woman, their hysterics and rantings will then be ignored except in cases where true harm against them was performed (i.e. real rape, something that has been declining in America for decades).
    Red pill ideas against the enemy is spreading rapidly, and you can now commonly see them in the comments section of mainstream publications (the ones that haven’t removed them, anyway). I believe the two tactics above will quicken the pace in getting more people over to our side.
    While we should not dilute our message or moderate ourselves to win these people over, we should help spread doubt that those who are trying to influence them are either mentally insane or flat out liars (commonly both). Hammer that into their brains over the next year or two and they will properly disregard the latest rantings and accusations that attempt to further escalate the war against men. While I don’t want to declare that victory may be within sight, I can say we’re inching ever so closer.

    View Comment
  9. Jack Smith
    June 22, 2017 at 12:46 pm

    If you see the word “information” as it refers to an individual or action in corporate or political america, be advised. Information means PROPAGANDA.

    Propaganda is all forms of communication designed to subvert or promote certain ideas, bigotry and/or processes. Propaganda can be either lies or truth.

    The Rightwing populist movement prefers truthful propaganda because the enemy must lie to refute it. When the enemy lies, we will crush him against his own lying.

    We prefer to win but we are not running for office.

    View Comment
  10. Jack Smith
    June 22, 2017 at 12:31 pm

    How Did Alex Jones Stomp Megyn Kelly in a Media interview Ambush 2017?

    This is the season of white victory. Anyone who wants to get rich by making white power rich, must be willing to learn how to win at political warfare against the media. Why rich? Money buys tools and information that result in stronger influence and power growth. We must learn how to win the information war.
    Most pro-white people never study the art of political warfare and how to promote themselves and right wing populism. So they soon become vilified, local whipping targets of ridicule and failure. Game Over!
    Frequently, new pro-white leaders are defeated at the starting gate when leftist amateurs of the local media easily hammer them into the ground. Local media rats seek to trap a fledgling white leader with racist accusations during their initial, “he’s a racist, kill the racist”, attacks. Then local media and local leftist political whores combine to create a narrative of the new pro-white leader as a “dumbass hater of no consequence.” That theme is used to bury the clumsy new amateur. By carrying out dozens of such killer missions annually, local leftist keep the streets swept clean of new white power groups and leaders. Its how they mature as belly crawling, crap spewing, media low lifes!
    Why let local media yokels run over you and crush you by stereotyping you as a racist loser, before you even get up steam? First rule, new pro-white groups must start (or emerge) on the internet, not in local politics.
    We can outsmart the most highly paid “international” media ambushers. In fact, we can use them as stepping stones to greater influence for the white populace.
    Following is one simple action sequence that was used to beat leftist media star Megyn Kelly. (Note: I dislike Megyn Kelly and I am not sure about Alex Jones’ reality, but I know that he is an Information War veteran and winner.)
    Media has changed dramatically lately because weapons of media combat are available cheap now. Jones was the winner over the Kelly in 2017, because he used those weapons.
    A little background: Over the last three or so years, there have been enormous leaps in smartphone technology. Smartphones are accessible to everyone, and not only can you watch HD video on them, you can record HD video and audio on them, and upload them to any social media site you choose for the whole world to see. Such tools are powerful weapons in the Information Wars that we must fight in order to win power for our people.
    When NBC pimped the latest interview by ball-cutting leftist Megyn Kelly, they implied that her “victim,” Alex Jones, so-called Conspiracy Marketer, would be ground into mincemeat. They promised another bloody rout of a favorite leftist media target in an eleven minute ambush interview.
    However, Alex Jones was ready to tame that wild cat. Before the interview with Kelly, Jones recorded the initial phone call from Kelly on his smart phone as she dripped sweetness all over him, promising no ambushes, no continuous accusations, no screaming, no hit pieces and/or no gotchas. (Somebody should teach President Trump how to use Alex Jones’ tactics of victory.)
    Not only did Jones record Kelly’s syrupy promises, he posted it all over his website, replete with his commentary. Next, he let his followers and friends with high engagement twitter accounts know about it. In other words, he set the frame and context of the interview before it aired.
    Most people, of course, did not see Jone’s preparation before the interview aired. BUT, in 2017, what everyone does after an interview is go to google search on the name that was interviewed. This, of course, leads them to Jones website where he has the pre interview calls posted and may or may not release the entire 8 hours of footage that he recorded on iPhones in his office.
    What he will be able to do for the next month or so is cut up and selectively edit his footage of the interview to constantly attack Kelly and the mainstream media, driving more visitors to his sites. In other words, he can do to her what only the mainstream media could do to him in the past.
    Jones’ audience will grow while he continues ridiculing her, something other journalists, insanely jealous of her $15 million a year salary will be only too happy to help with—in fact, it’s already started, have a look for yourself:
    >> NY Daily News: Jones vs. Kelly
    All of Jones’ articles will stay up forever, consistently driving traffic to Jones’ site, infowars.com (for all you internet marketers, it has an Alexa ranking of 896 in the US which is enormous) and widening his audience. This could never happen in old media.
    Alex Jones has a lot to teach pro-white groups about building influential power bases in commie America. Its simple stuff, once you get the hang of it and there is a lot to learn.
    With Information Warfare we can win 10, 20, a hundred white revolutions simultaneously.

    View Comment
  11. Jack Smith
    June 22, 2017 at 9:25 am

    Biased Censorship by Minority Parasite-Favoring Google
    Censorship is the suppression or prohibition of any/all parts of books, films, news, etc. that are considered politically unacceptable, or contradictory to the propaganda bias of the censor. Massive censorship is practiced by communist thought control martinets known as Google, Yahoo, Facebook, Twitter and other biased controllers of internet information. The worse offender of censorship over-kill is Google. Google’s removal or omission of information from its services or those of its subsidiary companies, such as YouTube, in order to comply with its neo-comunist company policies, neo-commie legal demands, or various enemy government censorship laws, is absolutely massive.
    In April 2008, Google refused to run ads for a UK Christian group opposed to abortion, explaining that “At this time, Google policy does not permit the advertisement of websites that contain ‘abortion and religion ‘”
    In April 2014, though Google accepts ads from the pro-choice abortion lobbying group NARAL, they have removed ads for some anti-abortion crisis pregnancy centers. Google removed the Web search ads after an investigation by NARAL found evidence that the ads violate Google’s policy against deceptive advertising. According to NARAL, people using Google to search for “abortion clinics” got ads advertising crisis pregnancy centers that were in fact anti-abortion. Google lied in a statement that it had followed normal company procedures in applying its ad policy standards related to ad relevance, clarity, and accuracy in this case.
    Google Maps
    In March 2007, lower resolution satellite imagery on Google Maps showing post-Hurricane Katrina damage in the U.S. state of Louisiana was replaced with higher resolution images from before the storm. Google’s official blog of April revealed that the imagery was still available in KML format on Google Earth or Google Maps.
    In March 2008, Google removed Street View and 360 degree images of military bases per The Pentagon’s request. Google refuses to protect the privacy and anonymity of individuals that are opposed to Google’s neo-communist ideology., In the United States, Google commonly filters search results to deny full information and alternative views that disprove Google’s hard-line bias. Any searches of the internet that question, refute or challenge, pro-black, anti-white bias and other communist biases which google refers to as, Digital Millennium Copyright Act-related legal complaints, such as in 2002 when Google filtered out websites that provided information critical of Scientology.
    In the United Kingdom, it was reported that Google had ‘delisted’ Inquisition 21st century, a website which claims to challenge moral authoritarian and sexually absolutist ideas in the United Kingdom. Google later released a press statement fraudulently suggesting Inquisition 21 had attempted to manipulate search results. In Germany and France, a study reported that approximately 350+ White nationalist, Nazi, anti-semitic, anti Islamic, right wing, populists, patriotic, pro-white, pro-identity, pro tribalsism and other websites had been removed from the English, German and French versions of Google.
    As of December 12, 2012, in the U.S., U.K., Australia and some other countries Google removed the option to turn off the SafeSearch image filter entirely, forcing users to enter more specific search queries to get adult content. Prior to the change three SafeSearch settings—”on”, “moderate”, and “off”—were available to users. Following the change, two “Filter explicit results” settings—”on” and “off”—were newly established. The former and new “on” settings are similar, and exclude explicit images from search results. The new “off” setting still permits explicit images to appear in search results, but users need to enter more specific search requests, and no direct equivalent of the old “off” setting exists following the change because adding additional explicit search terms alters the search results. The change brings image search results into line with Google’s existing settings for web and video search.
    Some users have stated that the lack of a completely unfiltered option amounts to “censorship” by Google. A Google spokesperson disagreed, saying that Google is “not censoring any adult content,” but “want to show users exactly what they are looking for—but we aim not to show sexually-explicit results unless a user is specifically searching for them.”.
    Following a settlement with the United States Food and Drug Administration ending Google Adwords advertising of Canadian pharmacies that permitted Americans access to cheaper prescriptions, Google agreed to several compliance and reporting measures to limit visibility of “rogue pharmacies”. Google and other members of the Center for Safe Internet Pharmacies are collaborating to remove illegal pharmacies from search results, and participating in “Operation Pangea” with the FDA and Interpol.
    Most Chinese Internet users were critical of Google for assisting the Chinese government in repressing its own citizens, particularly those dissenting against the government and advocating for human rights.Furthermore, Google had been denounced and called hypocritical by Free Media Movement and Reporters Without Borders for agreeing to China’s demands while simultaneously fighting the United States government’s requests for similar information. Google China had also been condemned by Reporters Without Borders,Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International.
    On February 14, 2006, protesters organized in a “mass breakup with Google” whereby users agreed to boycott Google on Valentine’s Day to show their disapproval of the Google China policy.
    European Union
    In July 2014 Google began removing certain search results from its search engines in the European Union in response to requests under the right to be forgotten. Articles whose links were removed, when searching for specific personal names, included a 2007 blog by the BBC journalist Robert Peston about Stan O’Neil, a former chairman of investment bank Merill Lynch, being forced out after the bank made huge losses. Peston criticised Google for “…cast[ing him] into oblivion”.
    In January 2010, Google was reported to have stopped providing automatic suggestions for any search beginning with the term “Islam is”, while it continued to do so for other major religions. Google also contradicts users who seek information on black racism/hate crimes, by providing instead access to unsubstantiated reports accusing whites of racism and hate crimes. Google uses the same methods to protect any real truth to emerging about Islam, Mohammed, Mandella, Pentagon, Clintonista generals, the democrat party, Hussein obama, the FBI and other traitorous communist persons and groups. When challenged by powerful organizations, Google usually backs down. According to Wired.com, a Google spokesperson stated, “this is a bug and we’re working to fix it as quickly as we can.” Suggestions for “Islam is” were available later that month. The word “Bilderberg” and the family name “Buchanan” were also reportedly censored in the auto-complete results, but were available by February 2010 as well. Nonetheless, Google continues to filter certain words considered threatening to minority parasitism and globalism, from autocomplete suggestions, describing them as “potentially inappropriate”. Google is so obsessed with pan-Africanism that any search or image search will include pictures of negroes
    The publication 2600: The Hacker Quarterly has compiled a list of words that are restricted by Google Instant. These are terms that the company’s Instant Search feature will not search. Most terms are political and neither vulgar nor derogatory in nature, but some apparently irrelevant searches including “Myleak” are removed.
    As of January 26, 2011, Google’s Auto Complete feature would not complete certain words such as “bittorrent”, “torrent”, “utorrent”, “megaupload”, and “rapidshare”, and Google actively censors search terms or phrases that its algorithm considers as likely constituting spam or competing with Google’s totalitarian bigotry or control of the internet.
    Google is a strong supporter of Hussein Obama, Angela Merkel, France, Ger,any Sweden. the European Union, Facebook, Twitter and any other individuals, nations, social media and/or pacts that are violently anti-white. Google’s president and top executives have repeatedly stated that “only white people are racist. Blacks and Moslems are never racist.” To reinforce this bias, Google refuses to allow any evidence or truth that contradicts its own authoritarian beliefs.
    Also in 2011-2017 Google Australia assisted by removing reference to websites that were deemed to be illegal under Australian Law. These URL’s can be accessed via Lumen.org (formerly Chilling Effects).
    Google endorses Canada’s denial of freedom of Speech to its white citizens. On 19 June 2014, it was reported that Google had been ordered to remove search results that linked to websites of a company called Datalink by the Supreme Court of British Columbia. The websites in question sell network device technology that Datalink is alleged to have stolen from Equustek Solutions. Google voluntarily removed links from google.ca, the main site used by Canadians, but the Court granted a temporary injunction applying to all Google sites across the world. Google argued that Canadian law could not be imposed across the world and was given until 27 June 2014 to comply with the Court’s ruling.
    Google adhered to the Internet censorship policies of China, enforced by means of filters colloquially known as “The Great Firewall of China” built for communist china by Google in March 2010. Google search results are filtered so as not to bring up any results concerning the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989, anti-communism, freedom of speech, sites supporting the independence movements of Tibet and Taiwan, the Falun Gong movement, and other information perceived to be harmful to the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Google claimed that some censorship is necessary in order to keep the Chinese government from blocking Google entirely, as occurred in 2002.
    Google lied when it claimed it did not plan to give the government information about users who search for blocked content, and will inform users that content has been restricted if they attempt to search for it.
    If you value your freedom fight Google, Facebook, Twitter and other totalitarian internet sites.
    Believe nothing produced by the US media, advertising, academia, government and other yet to be named enemies. Read foreign newspapers, the Dark Net, and certain small cadres of resistance fighters that give you the truth.

    View Comment
    • Jack Smith
      June 22, 2017 at 9:33 am

      Google terminated it war against Scientology, AFTER the Scientology organization presented enough threats to convince Google that they were faced with an offer that they could not refuse. Get off Scientology’s back! This is an example of the Organizational Weapon in action.
      In America, the norm, whining and complaining by individual white people, does not work. Organized (collective mass) action does work. The Organizational Weapon is the road to power.

      View Comment
  12. Jack Smith
    June 21, 2017 at 2:29 pm

    Worse than Treason

    WikiLeaks released documents explaining why U.S. AIRCRAFT were never sent to rescue the USA embassy and Ambassador Stevens under attack in Benghazi. President Obama and Hillary Clinton had a secret reason to order a stand down of the rescue troops.

    July 25th, 2012 a Chinook helicopter was taken down by one of the US own Stinger Missiles, but the idiot Taliban didn’t arm the missile and the Chinook didn’t explode, but was forced to land anyway from impact damage. An ordnance team recovered the serial number off the missile which led back to a cache of Stingers being kept in Qatar by the CIA.

    At 9:40 PM, September 11, 2012, members of Ansar al-Sharia attacked the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi resulting in the deaths of U.S Ambassador to Libya John Christopher Stevens and U.S. Foreign Service Information Management Officer Sean Smith. At around 4:00 AM on September 12, the group launched a mortar attack against a CIA annex approximately one mile away, killing CIA contractors Tyrone S. Woods and Glen Doherty and wounding ten others.

    Obama and Hillary were in full panic mode and sent Ambassador John Christopher “Chris” Stevens to Benghazi post haste in order to retrieve US made Stinger missiles supplied to Ansar al Sharia without Congressional oversight or permission. Hillary Clinton brokered the deal through Stevens and a private arms dealer named Marc Turi. Some of the shoulder fired missiles ended up in Afghanistan being used against American’s own military. This was a “do-or-die” mission, which explains the stand down orders given to multiple commando teams.

    It was the State Dept, not the CIA that supplied them to the USA sworn enemies, because David Howell Petraeus, director of the Central Intelligence Agency wouldn’t supply these deadly weapons due to their potential use on commercial aircraft. Then, Obama threw David Petraeus under the bus after he refused to testify that he confirmed their Bullshit smokescreen quoting points about a spontaneous uprising due to some YouTube video.

    Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton committed treason. THIS is what the investigation is all about, why she had a private computer server, (in order to delete the digital evidence), and why Obama, two weeks after the Benghazi attack, told the United Nation, sticking to the smokescreen YouTube video, knowing full well it was all lies.

    Further- the Taliban knew that this administration aided and abetted the enemy without Congressional approval when Congressman John Andrew Boehner created the Select Committee, and the Taliban began pushing the Obama Administration for release of five Taliban Generals.

    Just days after U.S. Army Private First Class Bowe Bergdahl went missing from his base in Afghanistan in 2009, the men in his platoon were ordered to sign papers vowing to never discuss what he did or their efforts to track him down. Bergdahl was just a pawn and a traitor. President Obama is not only corrupt but compromised, Hillary Clinton exposed as a serial liar, perjuring herself multiple times at the hearings.

    This would explain why no US military aircraft were NOT called in – the administration knew their enemies had US made Stinger Missiles.

    America now may have not only it’s first woman president but the package contains an habitual liar running their country with her finger on the button.

    Your vote can stop this before you won’t have a USA.

    Visit Wikileaks Hillary Clinton database of emails – [Click Here]
    More Hillary Lies and Corruption

    Click pic to search Wikileaks database

    From the desk of Julian Assange

    WikiLeaks begins its series on deals involving Hillary Clinton campaign Chairman John Podesta. Mr Podesta is a long-term associate of the Clintons and was President Bill Clinton’s Chief of Staff from 1998 until 2001. Mr Podesta also controls the Podesta Group, a major lobbying firm and is the Chair of the Center for American Progress (CAP), a Washington DC-based think tank. Part 1 of the Podesta Emails comprises 2,060 emails and 170 attachments and focuses on Mr Podesta’s communications relating to nuclear energy, and media handling over donations to the Clinton Foundation from mining and nuclear interests; 1,244 of the emails reference nuclear energy. The full collection includes emails to and from Hillary Clinton.

    In April 2015 the New York Times published a story about a company called “Uranium One” which was sold to Russian government-controlled interests, giving Russia effective control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for the production of nuclear weapons, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of US government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off the deal was the State Department, then headed by Secretary Clinton. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) comprises, among others, the secretaries of the Treasury, Defense, Homeland Security, Commerce and Energy.

    As Russian interests gradually took control of Uranium One millions of dollars were donated to the Clinton Foundation between 2009 and 2013 from individuals directly connected to the deal including the Chairman of Uranium One, Ian Telfer. Although Mrs Clinton had an agreement with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors to the Clinton Foundation, the contributions from the Chairman of Uranium One were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons.

    When the New York Times article was published the Clinton campaign spokesman, Brian Fallon, strongly rejected the possibility that then-Secretary Clinton exerted any influence in the US goverment’s review of the sale of Uranium One, describing this possibility as “baseless”.

    Mr Fallon promptly sent a memo to the New York Times with a rebuttal of the story (Podesta Email ID 1489).

    In this memo, Mr Fallon argued: “Apart from the fact that the State Department was one of just nine agencies involved in CFIUS, it is also true that within the State Department, the CFIUS approval process historically does not trigger the personal involvement of the Secretary of State. The State Department’s principal representative to CFIUS was the Assistant Secretary of State for Economic, Energy and Business Affairs. During the time period in question, that position was held by Jose Fernandez. As you are aware, Mr Fernandez has personally attested that “Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter.”

    What the Clinton campaign spokesman failed to disclose, however, was the fact that a few days before sending his rebuttal to the New York Times, Jose Fernandez wrote on the evening of the 17 April 2015 to John Podesta following a phone call from Mr Podesta (Email ID 2053): “John, It was good to talk to you this afternoon, and I appreciate your taking the time to call. As I mentioned, I would like to do all I can to support Secretary Clinton, and would welcome your advice and help in steering me to the right persons in the campaign”.

    Five days after this email (22 April 2015), Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon wrote a memo to the New York Times, declaring that “Jose Fernandez has personally attested that ‘Secretary Clinton never intervened with me on any CFIUS matter’,” but Fallon failed to mention that Fernandez was hardly a neutral witness in this case, considering that he had agreed with John Podesta to play a role in the Clinton campaign.

    The emails show that the contacts between John Podesta and Jose Fernandez go back to the time of internal Clinton campaign concern about the then-forthcoming book and movie “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer on the financial dealings of the Clinton Foundation.

    In an email dated 29 March 2015 (Email ID 2059), Jose Fernandez writes to Podesta: “Hi John, I trust you are getting a brief rest after a job well done. Thanks no doubt to your recommendation I have joined the CAP [Center for American Progress] board of trustees, which I’m finding extremely rewarding.”

    View Comment
  13. Jack Smith
    June 21, 2017 at 5:15 am

    Dr James Luchte, you are not a doctor of any sort and you are not a Nietzschean. Nietzche would rise up out of the grave to choke the life out of you, if you existed.

    You are a lying, toad of a false pretender. Neither you, nor your pity exists.

    “Luchte” you are a neo-commie shill and you came to this site to spread propaganda and shut me up.

    Since I list my email address, I have been death-threatened by cowardly anonymous blacks and moslems. I call you bastards out? opart78@yahoo.com

    Bring it on you belly crawling, crap eating sub human criminals.

    I itch to catch one of them in an attempted assassination

    View Comment
  14. Jack Smith
    June 21, 2017 at 5:05 am

    Negros, moslems and the US establishment is constantly trying to destroy white identity and sense of racial pride. They claim that white people are racist and are not entitled to protect their own best interests. They also promote white genocide.
    “Officially” the crazy racist US government and media has proclaimed:
    1. Only whites are racist.
    2. Only whites are not allowed to organize any group to protect their interests
    3. Only whites do not have the racial entitlements and special perks reserved for blacks and moslems.
    4. Whites must bear the economic burden of supporting blacks, Moslems and immigrants.
    5. Only whites commit race crimes or exhibit racial hatred.
    6. America’s minority parasite establishment is busy extending all negro entitlements additionally to Moslem “refugees.”
    7. Only white people suffer taxation without representation.

    Look at every advertisement, every TV show, every movie…everything. Blacks are only 9% of the population but they get 50-90% of the face time on every known media.
    One-third of every year in America is devoted exclusively to praising negroes (ML King Holiday, Black Heritage Month, Black Movie Month, Black History month and more.)
    Billions of taxpayer dollars, paid mostly by whites, goes for welfare and all sorts of hidden perks. Nearly 4,000 pro-blacks organizations receive funding from the US government, for example (one of hundreds of secret perks) all colleges are paid special fee for every black who is given a grade C or above (No proof that the black actually earned that grade is required).
    Black watchdog groups (380 of them) closely monitor every advertisement, movie, television show and literally everything to insure that blacks are hired and included in the presentations and given major roles. Black males are seen, over the shoulder of every shot in every movie or TV show wherein white people are talking. Every movie and TV show also models the pairing of black males with blonde females. Black presence is guaranteed in hundreds of historic epics, in spite of the fact that no negroes were there when the historic events happened. Blacks have been in movies as Vikings, Robin Hood’s Merry Men, and in hundreds of other false historic roles. Such fraudulent depictions of negroes, calculated to glorify them into permanent hero status, misinform children by teaching them lies!
    Only black “musicians” are allowed to present race hatred chants as recordings that are sold to minors.
    Most of the narcotic and organized crime in America is controlled by blacks and Moslems.
    Blacks are allowed to publicly threaten to murder white people on television, all black crimes and racist attacks on whites are covered up by the media, most black riots go unreported, blacks commit most crimes, especially rape and murder but media will not allow the public to know that blacks are the perps, whenever black lives matter stages a riot and kills or injures white people, the FBI and US Department of Justice arrive and coerce local law enforcement to pander to the black criminals.
    Blacks commit dozens of hate crimes and hate crime murders daily, but are never arrested or tried for hate crimes. US hate crime laws are used to suppress the white population.
    Black racist groups constantly pressure police departments everywhere to allow blacks to escape punishment for the crimes that they commit.
    When blacks are hired they cannot be fired unless there is strong evidence that they committed a major crime. In Washington DC, two multi-storied federal buildings house hundreds of black and moslem federal employees who refuse to work. They are paid high salaries to come to the office everyday, watch television, play games and generally loaf. There is strong evidence that the black 9% of the US population costs US taxpayers about 30% of their taxes annually.
    To make matters worse, thousands of black welfare foreigners are imported into American annually by over 150 sanctuary cities, in violation of federal law. This specific crime has been unpunished for over 30 years.
    The pro-black hate group, Southern Poverty Hate Center is promoted by American media and makes thousands of false attacks on white people annually.
    If you look up “black hate music” on Google internet, you will be presented with false news claiming that “white rap music is hate criminal.” If you look up black hate crimes and racism on Google internet, you will be allowed access only to fake news attacking white hate crimes that never happened.

    We can organize and destroy these criminals and their protectors.

    View Comment
  15. June 11, 2017 at 5:33 am

    I am tired of white genocide deleting my best comments.
    Every bit of evidence that I give about the true nature of this site is deleted.
    Yet “white genocide” gives leftist screwballs unlimited opportunity to attack the white race.
    Its obvious that these bastards are enemies of the white race.
    We populists will hound them off the internet.
    At the same time we are establishing several new blogs that are real. They are pro-white and the leftist scum who sponsor the fraudulent White Genocide Project will not be allowed any space to carry out anti-white propaganda,

    View Comment
    • George H
      July 1, 2017 at 6:57 pm

      Jack, please read my response to Stan. I think it is necessaty to use email accounts like 5 or 8 years before. BUt not Faebook or twitter or others under control of globalists and enemies of white race. .

      View Comment
  16. June 10, 2017 at 10:41 pm

    Soviet KGB Defector Yuri Bezmenov Accurately Predicted Americas Decline and Obama Style Cultural Marxism Continues to Roll
    Bezmenov described the revolutionary script as demoralization, destabilization, crisis, and normalization. After coming to the USA, he was horrified to see this process well in development. Let’s see how his predictions from 1984 turned out.
    Demoralization
    It takes from fifteen to twenty years to demoralize a nation… Because this is the minimum number of years required to educate one generation of students… exposed to the ideology of the enemy. In other words, Marxism-Leninism ideology is being pumped into the soft heads of at least three generations of American students, without being challenged or contra-balanced by the basic values of Americanism, American patriotism.
    This has been the standard brainwashing for college students since the 1960s. This is why subverting education was instrumental.
    Getting the media on board—our other opinion-forming institution—surely was much easier, given all the fellow travelers and such-like already running the show.
    Most of the people who graduated in the sixties, drop outs or half-baked intellectuals, are now occupying the positions of power in the government, civil service, business, mass media, educational system. You are stuck with them. You cannot get rid of them. They are contaminated. They are programmed to think and react to certain stimuli in a certain pattern.
    This is what the leftist “Long March through the institutions” did. The educational system is thoroughly pozzed out. Even the K-12 public schools have become indoctrination centers, with sickening results.
    Propaganda saturates journalism, Hollyweird, television, the literary establishment, the music industry, and a great many magazines. It’s even seeping into mindless entertainment like comic books and pornography. Many other institutions have been subverted, of course: government, big corporations, several nonprofits, even many religions.
    The demoralization process in the United States is basically completed already. For the last twenty-five years, actually it’s over-fulfilled because the demoralization now reaches such areas where previously not even comrade Andropov and all his experts would even dream of such a tremendous success. Most of it is done by Americans to Americans thanks to lack of moral standards.
    Destabilization
    After society has been softened up, then the plan is to create chaos leading to a revolutionary ferment.
    This time, and it takes only two to five years to destabilize a nation, what matters is essentials. Economy, foreign relations, defense systems. And you can see it quite clearly that in some areas, in such sensitive areas as defense and economy, the influence of Marxist-Leninist ideas in the United States is absolutely fantastic. I could never believe it fourteen years ago when I landed in this part of the world that the process will go that fast.
    The Age of Aquarius had a violent undercurrent. This included angry demonstrations that sometimes got out of hand, terrorism by leftist whack-jobs, and race riots. As G. Gordon Liddy, an FBI agent and Watergate burglar, described:
    [W]e were involved in an exterior war in Vietnam, but they tend to forget that we were also embroiled in an undeclared civil war at home. And unless you can understand the nature of that struggle and the issues it posed for the administration in Washington, you’ll never be able to understand my motives or the motives of my associates in undertaking the actions and running the risks we did. We were up against a formidable constellation of forces in those days, an alliance of influential elements of the media with a so-called counterculture that represented a Weltanschauung and lifestyle that were utterly repugnant to me. […]
    We didn’t have a crystal ball at our disposal in those days that would inform us that mass student opposition to the war would peter out after the end of the draft, or that the racial cauldron in the big cities would eventually simmer down. We had to act on our best intelligence assessment of the forces arrayed against us, and that assessment was far from encouraging, particularly when you consider the revolutionaries.
    As Vasili Mitrokhin, another KGB insider, said:
    The attempt to stir up racial tensions in the United States remained part of Service A’s stock-in-trade for the remainder of the Cold War.
    Actually, Communists have been up to that since the 1930s. Besides inner city riots, most other havoc was from the not-always-peaceful peace movement; it would be an obvious priority for the Soviets to hamstring the Vietnam War effort. This doesn’t mean that all the protesters were taking orders from the KGB; most just didn’t want to get drafted. Still, Soviet “active measures” (even when indirect) had their effect.
    During the 1960s, chaos reached a fever pitch. Then during the Reagan years, things got almost as calm as during the 1950s. Afterward, disorder returned to approximately the late 1970s level and stayed that way.
    Then during the Obama administration, angry demonstrations and riots against the police became relatively frequent. Often the participants included paid protesters bused in from out of state. Worse, on-duty police officers started getting assassinated. The agitation groups haven’t been linked to that, though their rhetoric didn’t quite promote tranquility.
    Finally, 2016 saw rioting reminiscent of the 1960s. Was someone trying to start something? Is it merely a coincidence that was an election year?
    Crisis
    The next stage of course is crisis. It may take only up to six weeks to bring a country to the verge of crisis. You can see it in Central America now.
    In the wake of the 2008 economic meltdown, Obama was elected, promising to fix the economy. He was also supposed to heal America’s racial divisions, halve the deficit within his first term, get us out of war within a year, and give everyone a pony for Christmas. Somehow The Lightworker managed to get re-elected, proving conclusively that the masses have a short memory.
    Surely there are those who can hardly wait to exploit (or engineer) some new crisis. What form this might take, and whether it might be more successful, is anyone’s guess.
    Normalization
    And after crisis with a violent change of power structure and economy you have so called the period of normalization… This is what will happen in the United States if you allow all the schmucks to bring the country to crisis, to promise people all kind of goodies and the paradise on Earth, to destabilize your economy, to eliminate the principle of free market competition and to put big brother government in Washington DC…
    In the end, they had to settle for the legal route, which means they didn’t get everything they wanted. Therefore, it was a remarkably half-assed revolution. Rather than a radical Gleichschaltung, they got a dysfunctional healthcare law.
    So the leftists got their mediocre “community organizer” elected. After that, they placed their hopes with Hillary, expected to run against some lukewarm Republican nominee.
    How much of the revolutionary activities beginning in the 1960s were caused by the KGB’s “active measures” campaign? The circumstantial case is pretty compelling, but the full story hasn’t yet been told. It’s easy to underestimate how well-networked the radical left was.
    I’ll concur with Bezmenov that the demoralization process has been over-fulfilled. Leftists are still pushing psychological warfare. (In 1984, today’s degradation would’ve been unimaginable.) Destabilization was very promising at first, but they failed to keep the ball rolling. Thus, they never got to the point where a violent overthrow was possible.
    Then in 1991, the USSR dissolved. Thus, the KGB was no longer in control. Still, this was far from the end of the story. Their dysfunctional “for export” ideology—cultural Marxism, better known as progressivism—is still shoved down our throats by the schools and the media. Certain elements have embraced it, from SJW losers to petty bureaucrats to the ultra-wealthy (quite ironically) who find it useful for their purposes.
    Cultural Marxism lost something vital after it was co-opted by a clique of decadent billionaires with a God complex. Although their shadow government (usually) can anoint the candidates for both parties, they still have to operate through figureheads. Their New World Order dictatorship isn’t ready for prime time. They overplayed their hand. The public is getting wise to their games, and they lost their chance for Queen Hillary to finish the job on us.
    We now have a fighting chance to restore national self-determination. The future is what we make it.

    View Comment
    • June 11, 2017 at 11:17 am

      Your very words reveal your inferiority. If I were not a Nietzschean, I would pity you.

      View Comment
  17. Stan
    June 5, 2017 at 9:14 am

    And how do u propose to organize resistance againt such odds?

    View Comment
    • June 6, 2017 at 10:45 am

      White Realpolitik2 an Introduction

      “Why, what’s the meaning of it?” he thought with vexation.
      “Why have I really gone out of my mind, or what?” – The Double

      People tell me: “I will only work against the neo-communist White Genocide Establishment (WGE) only if the work is nonviolent.”

      We have to start out nonviolently because organization, followed by recruitment, training and reorganization, must take place without public drama or attention-seeking violence. We will make it very hard for the monolithic communist media to ferret out our plans and identify our several groups of leaders.
      The organization will go through a stage of vulnerability as it establishes the infrastructure necessary for a world-wide political war to refine and extend the political power and influence of white people.

      The period of initiation has several inter-related objectives, including:
      1. Forming initial leadership cadres.
      2. Carrying out mission-directed operations for: leadership self training, recruitment, promotional and recruitment propaganda, inculcating revolutionary tradecraft and security, polarization, white tribalism, white identity, liberation ideology, and establishing passive support networks, (e.g. intelligence, counterintelligence, fund raising, foreign liaison, rat lines, etc.)
      3. Utilizing initial missions to determine:
       Who is trustworthy and courageous
       Who has what skills (For example ethical hacking)
       Who is a subversive infiltrator? (servant of the WGE)
       Who is dedicated to the cause
       Who is qualified to carry out what types of work
       Etcettera
      4. Initiate Reflexive Control and other Influence Operations

      What type of org will we be creating and committing to combat?

      This organization will fight for the best interests of those white people (middle class and working class) who are not traitors serving WGE. We will minimally obtain:

       Representation in return for taxation (e.g. our own political parties)
       A decisive voice in how our tax dollars are collected and spent
       Organizations capable of fighting for our civil rights and voice in any arena necessary
       Full use of the political weapons of Populism to include: Referendum, Recall, Initiative and several others populist political weapons that we will launched by surprise
       We will isolate and eliminate the support of minority parasites now in control of the USA.
       We will assist in the destruction of the European Union and all Caliphates now worming their way to control in the West.
       We will halt all in-migration and begin mass deportation of undesirable aliens (e.g. rioters, bums, thugs, rapists, killers, the “entitled,” etcetera.
       We will liquidate the current communist: one-party government, media, advertising, “entertainment”, university, oligarchy, and other enemies of white life and freedom.

      White Political Strategy

      The Seven Natural Laws of White Politics
       Law of Self Interest: Work first to benefit yourself, your family and the white tribe.
       Law of Corporeity: Unify and work with others who are like-minded and share your needs.
       Law of Return: Investments of time, money, and/or effort demand a return of value to the taxpayers.
       Law of Reciprocity: Favors are exchanged and repaid in kind.
       Law of Accountability: Representatives of your interests are obligated to serve it competently.
       Law of Retaliation: Any who betray white trust will not endure.
       Law of Protracted Effort: The political struggle never ends.
       Law of Victory: Always utilize the Organizational Weapon and Entryism

      Politics requires action. Political action is guided by clear precepts.

      Operational Precepts of the Organizational Weapon
       Information is a Weapon: Decisions and plans require it.
       Strike Opponent’s Weak Points: Research pulls action toward oppositional weakness.
       Seek the Initiative: Control the struggle by defining the issues.
       Polarize: Create a center of gravity by identifying and fighting for right against wrong. Compromise must favor our side!
       Obtain Surprise: Force the opposition to adapt by getting inside their OODA (Observation, Orientation, Decision, Action) Loop and advancing along the lines of least expectation.
       Advance Along Multiple Lines: Attack from several directions.
       Maintain Momentum: Don’t stop the pressure, spread it!
      The Levels of Political War
      Strategy: Maneuver targeted against the most powerful enemy COG.
      Operational: Maneuver against regional and state enemies, media.
      Tactics: Maneuver against political individuals, city and county level.

      The Organizational Weapon requires a clear strategy.

      View Comment
    • June 10, 2017 at 10:53 pm

      Stan
      Small groups of dedicated white men have taken on greater odds in the past and won. Such odds, believe or not, motivate confident men to fight harder.
      If you are lying in a gutter, riddled with bullets, do you tell yourself not to survive because of the odds? In crisis situation do you have any other choice?
      By the same token, we rightwing populists will greatly enjoy totally demolishing the great power of a few minority parasite racists and killers.Why? Because they are much weaker than most people imagine and the process of their destruction will be most pleasant..

      If you are merely curious and prefer the safety of hiding under your bed, then I bid you adieu.
      But if you want to defeat the arrogant swine who hold us in bondage, come forward, talk to me, by email. opart78@yahoo.com We will discuss what can be done and how you might be able to safely work for a great, yet attainable goal…return of power, internationally, to the white race.
      If you want to fight for your freedom, then you will switch communication to a secure portal. Then the adventure begins.

      View Comment
  18. June 2, 2017 at 10:25 pm

    We are not overwhelmed by the evil blood thirsty behavior of our enemies. One reason for this calmness is our realization that our enemies are insane in the same way that rabid beasts of the negro and moslem jungle, are insane in their efforts to enslave and mass murder us.
    How is that realization advantageous to us? Its simple. We can study the weaknesses of their warped psyches and create psychological tactics that will accelerate their progress towards their inevitable whining, carpet-chewing breakdown. Isn’t it time that they begin experiencing the “world of shit,” that they have tortured us with, for decades?
    As the leaders of White Genocide advocate, certain key words, phrases, memes can help our cause. Such slogans and thought-leading pronunciamentos, combined with other positive propaganda, can be broadcast by us. Such relentless, carefully-crafted propaganda barrages will cause the evil beasts who seek to drink our blood to begin to feast on each other. However, we must target the enemy’s Achilles Heel.

    Where do I get such strange ideas? I get those ideas from several sources, including:
    1. My life experience
    2. My several degrees in Psychology
    3. My training at the Psychological Warfare School at Fort Bragg, NC, and subsequent applications of that training in the real world..

    Any of you, who are my like-minded comrades, should be exposed to useful data regarding how psychologically-shattering propaganda, broadcast repetitiously against our insane enemies, can accelerate their ouster from their position as feudal overlords controlling our destiny.
    Carefully-crafted propaganda can be used to discomfort and destroy our blood thirsty criminal enemies, without any risks. But more importantly, such tactics must work in concert with a variety of other tactics professionally targeted against enemy weaknesses. We want more and more ruthless headhunters of whites to appear in the media whining in rage as they puke out their insane racist hatred.
    Most Americans already hate the US media, advertising agencies and so-called celebrities. By totally exposing the degenerate insanity of those would-be brainwashers, micromanagers and holier-than-thou demons, we can do the public a service by placing the totally insane into that category of madness that disallows any respect or submission. Ridicule of crazy microcephalics cross-matrixed with an immoral Napoleonic complex, is most effective in political warfare.
    We have wasted too much time taking it. Now we will dish it out.

    View Comment
  19. June 2, 2017 at 9:50 pm

    Some posts that I have made, enunciate additional truths about the functioning international genocide against white people by the triple entente evil of, negros, moslems and progressive (communist) renegade whites. Some of those posts disappeared from this site. To me, each message is my personal outreach to like-minded whites and it is disappointing for any such post to disappear.
    My posts are designed to suggest a broad front initiative-seeking political warfare offensive, relentlessly conducted internationally against those who would genocide our people.

    I am also disappointed that no subscriber to this fine organization has contacted me to discuss how we may work together for the best interests of white people.Our enemies are busy tearing down our history and traditions to the point of destroying the statues of of our heroes. Such acts demand revenge!
    Although I advocate an international war against those who would destroy us, I also advocate that America be turned into an arsenal for white liberation. To bring that about, we must organize and attack our enemies using every political warfare tactic available.

    I want to work with people who are already self-informed enough to be totally committed to the white cause. They will not have to be persuaded because they already know the gravity of this mounting assault on our identity and our tribe.

    Strong pro-white activists must be committed to collective programs in keeping with the best procedures of the organizational weapon and entryism, which each activist will be taught.
    Those who are only interested in reading a constantly expanding litany of enemy victories, and/or venting their anger by posting a few bon mots, will not be instrumental in this war.
    This war is conducted not only our survival, but more importantly for the growth of our influence world-wide. To stay on the defensive invites total annihilation. The evil scum who want to parade our severed heads, must be totally defeated!

    View Comment
  20. June 2, 2017 at 9:32 pm

    This is one of the best pro-white sites in America. It must spread to Europe. It is our duty to help this site grown ever more powerful and influential . By raising money and using that money to advertise in order to recruit new members, we would be off to a good start.
    We should also offer a program of training, with a reasonable cost, to upgrade the knowledge and problem solving ability of self-identified and like-minded ideologues. I have created such programs before and I would love to submit a presentation, in writing, about such a training program. The training program that I speak of ,has one objective: train the strongest recruits to become part of activist agit-prop cadres, capable of planning and carrying out political warfare (initially nonviolent) against our enemies.

    View Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.