US and Canadian study discovers what people think of ‘diversity’.

A study conducted throughout the United States and Canada, has found that people believe ‘diversity’ is a good thing, but hate it to live around it, and become more anti-social when they do.

null

When Tibet is full of Chinese it’s Genocide. When White countries are full of non-Whites it’s “diversity”.

Robert Putnam, a Harvard sociologist, who is also a Liberal, has just completed a study of over 30,000 North Americans and Canadians, asking people from various cities and towns in both countries what they think about ‘diversity’. In total, the survey of people’s attitudes was conducted in 41 American cities and towns.

According to Putnam, people who live in cities like Toronto, Vancouver, and Los Angeles where White people have become or are close to becoming a minority, are much less likely to associate with their neighbors.

Not only that, but the study found that people were considerably less likely to vote, pay taxes, donate to charities, volunteer, and trust people – even people of their own race.

In his report ‘E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the 21st century’, Putnam writes: “Inhabitants of diverse communities tend to withdraw from collective life, to distrust their neighbours, regardless of the colour of their skin, to withdraw even from close friends, to expect the worst from their community and its leaders, to volunteer less, give less to charity and work on community projects less often, vote less … have less faith that they can actually make a difference, and to huddle unhappily in front of the television.

A similar study conducted on 3,800 people by the Vancouver Foundation, fell in line with Putnam’s study, finding that people felt unusually lonelier and had less friends if they lived in areas that had many races and ethnicities, and while they believed that ‘diversity’ is a good thing, they preferred to be with members of their own ethnic or racial group.

As a Liberal, Putnam was left severely unsatisfied by his study and has made several attempts to explain why people don’t like living as a minority, but he has failed to find any other explanations – in fact many other academics from over the world have confirmed his findings.

Putnam realizes that his research has proved many of his side’s beliefs about ‘diversity’ to be wrong, finding that there was no “harmony” or “fusion”, and in fact, finding that it was a severe drain on resources and public money.

However, he still insists that doing the same thing (making places minority White) over, and over again will all be worth it in the long run, as he believes it will create a more scientific and intellectual society – despite not even a suggestion of such a thing happening yet.

He insists that trying to make people assimilate will fix these problems, arguing that there should be “more opportunities for meaningful interaction across ethnic lines.

Putnam summarizes his report, saying that higher ‘diversity’ leads to “lower confidence in local government, local leaders and the local news media … less expectation others will cooperate to solve dilemmas … less likelihood of working on a community project … lower likelihood of giving to charity … and less happiness and lower perceived quality of life.

Anti-Whites love to talk about ‘diversity’, but none of them will actually live in what they have created. All this ‘diversity’ and ‘mixing the races’ is ONLY ever seriously discussed in White countries. If any non-White started screaming about the ‘lack of diversity’ in non-White countries, and how non-White countries ‘should be for everyone’ – they would be laughed at . . . but in White countries people screaming those statements are given respect and lots of public money to DO just that.

No Black, Brown, or Asian country gets called “racist” because it doesn’t want to become a ‘diverse’ country. This word is reserved ONLY for White people and White countries.

Thus, it is clear to say that ‘diversity’ simply means getting rid of White people – diversity is just a codeword for White genocide.

VancouverSun.com

Share

11 comments for “US and Canadian study discovers what people think of ‘diversity’.

  1. February 13, 2014 at 3:50 pm

    Cant blame White People, Anti-White people are too DANGEROUS !!.

    • none
      February 13, 2014 at 9:08 pm

      This is so stupid. Those “white” countries used to be native american/aboriginal/indian/south african black countries. Why weren’t white people complaining about genocide when they where committing it? You guys arw ridiculous. White countries.

      • Steve Goode
        February 14, 2014 at 3:25 am

        South Africa used to be inhabited by light-brown skinned Hottentots, then Black people (the Zulus) invaded the land, and about the same time White people (Dutch) started settling on the virtually uninhabited coastal areas.

        But you don’t care about native people – because you’re just an anti-White. You ONLY care about native people when it suits your ideology.

        Take a hike, anti-White.

  2. Student
    February 13, 2014 at 9:54 pm

    This proves that multiculture is wrong. You in America has had several hundred years of multiculture and it still doesn’t work. In my country, Sweden, we’ve had multiculture for only about 40 years, not counting the post war immigration from neighbouring countries and yes, people say positive things about multiculture – but they will never visit a diverse part of the city, nor will they be friends or seek relations with diverse people.

    • Scott the Strategerist
      February 14, 2014 at 12:42 am

      You’ve convinced me. I wish to deny to Sweden the benefits of diversity and multiculturalism. You won’t have a large variety of ethnic restaurants. Your children and grandchildren will look like you. I hope you’re happy!

      • Student
        February 14, 2014 at 10:37 am

        I think you are missing the point. We already have lots of ethnic restaurants, and why shouldn’t someone like myself enjoy thaifood and pizza? A lot of us Swedes are against the massive immigration over the last 30-40 years of refugees from all around the world. In Sweden the immigrants are considered holy, and if you criticise anything about them, their sometimes unacceptable behaviour and savage religious practices – then you are labeled RACIST. Statisticks show that immigrants are more than twice as criminal as us Swedes and still we are not allowed to say this.

        For those who don’t know so much about this little country Sweden, I can tell you that it used to have a modest 8 million inhabitans some thirty-forty years ago. Due to massive immigration Sweden now has about 10 million inhabitans. So, over a period of 30-40 years our population has been “enriched” with 2 million immigrants. Not so much you say? If you compare it with America it would mean that America would have to accept 53.5 million immigrants over a period of 40 years.

        What makes Sweden so unique, is that we don’t force immigrants to work – they don’t have to if they don’t want to. Hey, they don’t even have to learn our language! It’s not uncommon among immigrants to have been unemployed for 10+ years and they still don’t know the most usual greeting phrases in Swedish. Having done nothing for the Swedish society, they still have the right to enjoy free healthcare, pretty much free medication, free education, and lots of other free benefits.

  3. Mr White
    February 15, 2014 at 5:13 am

    Hi Student,
    Careful, you are calling for the immigrants to be forced integrated with the Swedish people. Forced integration means your sons and daughters will marry non-Whites and the White birthrate will collapse. Reducing birthrates of identifiable national groups, is gencoide according to UN Law.

    I also want to correct your point about America being multicultural. America had a Whites only immigration policy up until 1965. It is in the preamble to the Constitution – “secure the blessings of liberty to Ourselves and Our Posterity” and it was changed illegally.

    Note they capitalized the words “Ourselves and Our Posterity”. They were not talking about Africans or Asians, when they ratified that document. They were talking about White men like themselves.

    • Student
      February 16, 2014 at 8:06 am

      Forced immigration is what the government wants, but they don’t know how…

      But you Americans have been living side by side with blacks since 1776? The first black man i saw in Sweden was as a young kid in 1979 and that was a very rare moment. I don’t think we’ve had more than a rare few black inhabitans since before 1980 in Sweden.

  4. Sum Dum Goy
    February 15, 2014 at 8:58 pm

    There are people who can do anything.And theres the other people who want the things those people make.One group uses the dreamworld to figure out anything.And the other group uses it to slow down progress and talk to brother mountain and sister cloud.They sit and wait to go back to the treehugging days of violence and witch doctors.I’m not wiith those guys.But I bet mixing the groups together is why places like Atlantis will never work.Do you care?Probably not.We should just do this WW3 thing.If that hurts people’s feelings they should dance like animals until it stops.

Something on your mind? Have your say!