A Swedish politician has argued for the deportation of men, instead of immigrants.
On debatt.svt.se, Magda Rasmusson, a politician for Sweden’s Green Party, and spokeswoman for Green Youth party wrote that men are the problem in society, and argues that reducing the amount of immigrants Sweden takes in would be oppressive to migrant women.
“[Men suggested] the proposal to reduce immigration by 90 percent while migrant women are said to live in oppression.” Rasmusson wrote.
“Anyone who wants to fight violence and oppression of women in a serious manner should therefore deal with crushing [the] patriarchy and increasing equality.”
She continues “[The right-wing have] the nerve to point out the “immigrants” as the major threat to women’s rights and safety.”
“Their policies would throw Sweden’s progress on equality decades back in time.”
“If they were a bit serious about even trying, it would be more appropriate to discuss the expulsion of men, rather than immigrants.”
This is a less conventional anti-White argument, but it is an anti-White argument non-the-less. Rasmusson says that opposing conditions of genocide against the Swedish people is wrong, and suggests replacing those conditions of genocide with different conditions of genocide.
While mass immigration is the anti-Whites favorite genocidal weapon of choice, a less effective weapon of genocide is to discourage White men and women from having children. Rasmusson is suggesting the previous method of genocide.
What they do and say always leads to a world without White people. In their world, Black people would have most of Africa, Oriental people would have China, Japan, and other places, however, White countries would no longer be full of White people.
In an anti-White’s world, White countries are for everyone!
In an anti-White’s world, White people don’t exist or matter, unless there are “too many Whites”.
In an anti-White’s world, White genocide is not an option; it’s an obligation.