Social scientist: “White genocide a lost cause?”

A Michigan state university sociologist, Zachary Neal says that making people from different racial, social, economical, or religious backgrounds live and function in the same area might not be possible, evidenced by one of his studies.

In a statement Neal said “these findings show it may not be possible to simultaneously create communities that are both fully integrated and fully cohesive . . . when it comes to neighborhood desegregation and social cohesion, you can’t have your cake and eat it too.”

In essence, he is saying when two or more groups of people are forced to share a country, the country is fractured and disunited.

This is pretty darn obvious common sense. An example of this is in Britain, where Grey furred squirrels are native. Biologists introduced Red furred squirrels from America and the Red squirrels killed most of the Grey squirrels. Today, Grey squirrels are almost extinct. As human beings, we are just highly evolved animals, it means that we operate under the same laws animals do.


Diversity – just a codeword for less White people.

He went on to say that the majority of people want to date people who are similar to themselves; by race, religion, social class, or any other divisions of society.

Neal’s study was based on several computer models of fictional neighborhoods. The study found that when a neighborhood is more heterogeneous (different groups of people) it is less united, and vice versa, when a neighborhood is more homogenous (same group of people) it is more united.

With a whiff of defeat, Neal said “These trends are so strong, it’s unlikely policy can change it. It’s not that local leaders and policymakers aren’t trying hard enough, rather, we now think it’s because the goals of integration and cohesion are just not compatible with each other.”

Neal’s findings have been published in the American journal of community psychology.



14 comments for “Social scientist: “White genocide a lost cause?”

  1. November 22, 2013 at 9:50 am

    Fascinating report, thanks!

  2. November 22, 2013 at 10:38 am

    The only surprise is that Mr Neal was allowed to publish.

  3. Sanman
    November 22, 2013 at 10:41 am

    No shit well hopefully the social engineers are going to stop, ha yeah right

  4. John
    November 22, 2013 at 1:17 pm

    This man has become a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews!

  5. asgardian127
    November 22, 2013 at 4:54 pm

    Why was this information ALLOWED to be produced?

  6. Dan
    November 23, 2013 at 12:19 pm

    So the eggheads finally figured out the obvious!

  7. Anonymous
    November 23, 2013 at 1:46 pm


  8. November 23, 2013 at 2:05 pm

    Actually its the grey squirrels that came and killed all the native red squirrels, grey squirrels are bigger and more aggressive than their timid red counterparts.

  9. erika
    November 23, 2013 at 2:29 pm

    Not surprising. However, 1 minor disagreement: human brains are about what 3000 times bigger and more complex than that of the Grey and Red squirrels? We are capable of rational thought and with a strong moral compass, able to overcome animal instincts/mentality. Only when pushed to the very limits of our humanity do we revert back to barbaric, animal-like behavior.

    • November 23, 2013 at 5:07 pm

      If raw brain size was relevant, cetaceans would be the dominant species.
      It’s the ratio of brain to body size that’s significant.

  10. Jeff
    November 23, 2013 at 4:57 pm

    Wonder how much it cost to “conclude” the obvious that everyone has known for thousands of years.

  11. Louvis
    November 23, 2013 at 5:37 pm

    People act differently when in a mob than they do individually.

  12. martin
    November 27, 2013 at 6:07 pm


Something on your mind? Have your say!