UK Minister: White immigration bad for White genocide.

Ex UK Home Secretary Jack Straw has said that open borders for Britain has been a “spectacular mistake”.

Straw was not referring to the 4.4 Million non-Whites in London (and 55% OF London) alone; rather he was talking about the one million Eastern European immigrants spread across the entire UK; Straw said that EU (White) migration was “messed up”.

He said there was a “social dislocation” (not assimilating) which could be caused when “large numbers of people from abroad settle in a particular area”.

In the UK to be a “respectable” (non opposing) critic of immigration, you MUST only talk about White immigration, and completely ignore non-White immigration of any magnitude.

White genocide requires non-Whites, so the ones pushing for it will make opposing non-White migration socially difficult. In the UK opposing White immigration is just scapegoating all the problems on to the people they’re trying to destroy through assimilation.

Original article.


Norwegian TV/Radio hosts want more violent White genocide.

Arild Opheim and Elin Ruhlin Gjuvsland are two journalists that work for NRK – Norwegian STATE TV and Radio. After two illegal immigrants from Northern Africa broke into their house and attacked and robbed them, but neither presenter was worried about the danger of being robber or attacked; they were more concerned that they might be called “racist”.

Elin said that she came close to believing “that immigrants are just coming here to exploit us, that we have to make sure that there won’t want be too many of them, and that we’re going to be overpopulated with certain nationalities in fifty years.”

She was also worried about an increase in crime and went on to say “Damn it, is this going to turn me into a racist?”

So to remain “anti-racist” (anti-White), both claimed that white Norwegians deserve to be victims of violent crime at the hands of non-white immigrants.

Opheim and Gjuvsland both agree with what one of their illegal immigrant robbers told them:

“We’re getting what we deserve because of Norway’s, and Europe’s, immigration policies. Because they’re too strict.”

The United Nations genocide conventions included a convention about mental harm to a group being genocide as well;

“(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;”

Rapists can get their victims to believe that it’s the victim’s fault. This is true with genocide as well.

White genocide, we are told sometimes, is because of what White people did. Meanwhile on planet earth, we can look at any non-White group on planet earth and they have done the same crimes – all races, groups, religions have committed crimes, but the difference is ONLY White people must pay (with their deaths) to “make things better”.

Original article.


“Secret” EU Proposal to spy on resisters of White genocide.

The European Parliament is currently considering a proposal which will allow direct surveillance of any EU citizen who is SUSPECTED of being “intolerant”. This is being discussed now under the radar while other the European citizens are occupied talking about the U.S. spying scandal.

The “civil liberties, Justice. and Home Affairs” Committee of the European Parliament has proposed to pass the European Framework National Statute for the Promotion of Tolerance, which would become law in the 28 EU member states; resulting in spy groups, or as the proposal described them: “special administrative units”. These spy groups would monitor any person or group that expresses opposition or unhappiness towards “multiculturalism” (no more White people), “diversity” (no more White people), and “tolerance” (tolerating the previous two policies).

In Europe, citizens are regularly punished for publically expressing the “wrong” opinions; however the proposed law would in the future also cause them to be punished for “intolerance” when speaking on a phone, by text message, by email, messaging on a games console, internet chat, internet searches, or anything really, that can be spied on.

The policy proposal was drafted by the European Council on Tolerance and Reconciliation (ECTR), a non-governmental organization established by Moshe Kantor, and former president of Poland, Aleksander Kwasniewski.

The proposal also says “tolerance must be practiced not only by governmental bodies but equally by individuals.” . . . “Guarantee of tolerance must be understood not only as a vertical relationship (government-to-individuals) but also as a horizontal relationship (group-to-group and person-to-person). It is the obligation of the government to ensure that intolerance is not practiced either in vertical or in horizontal relationships.”, and in another section it declares “there is no need to be tolerant to the intolerant.”

After five years of lobbying in Europe, the ECTR proposal seems to be gaining traction, as evidenced by the EU Parliament’s recent decision to give the group a 45-minute time slot to present its proposal to the Civil Liberties committee on September 17 2014.

Well it seems like the EU is getting very worried that resisters of White genocide might actually wake up all the people around us. After all, why would they need to spend time to deliberately spy on us?

Original article.


Harvard law professor: Bias against Whites good for White genocide.

Professor Randall Kennedy, a Harvard law professor, confirmed that White applicants to the University of Texas are being “disadvantaged”, and non-Whites being “advantaged”, by “affirmative action” policies for “a good reason”, at the Politics and Prose bookstore in D.C.

Kennedy attended the bookstore to do a presentation about his book “For Discrimination: Race, Affirmative Action, and the law”, where he argued that “affirmative action” was a legally accepted form of discrimination against White people.

He went on to say that legally, it did not breach the fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, and expressed his belief that discrimination against non-Whites is bad – “malign discrimination”, and discrimination against Whites is good – “benign discrimination”, arguing that “good” discrimination would fight the “invisible wind of racism”, and that “color-blind” policies were the problem.

Again, and again, We see the true face of “anti-racism”; it has nothing to do with making people equal – it is all about getting rid of White people – White genocide, and anti-White.

The point of “affirmative action” is to look more favourably on non-Whites so that non-Whites can have more control over White people.

Many Americans now agree in the polls that Obama is a poor performing leader; Time magazine put him below Russian president, Vladimir Putin, in their world’s most powerful people article. Despite this, the reason why he was elected, and then re-elected is because he’s the “affirmative action” president.

You have heard of Martin Luther King’s “I have a Dream” speech, which anti-Whites love to quote. Affirmative action was never part of it, and the idea of it goes against what he said. Anti-Whites don’t really care what he said – all they care about is White genocide and they’ll use whatever means they can to achieve that.

When it comes to White genocide, the national laws always let it slide by unopposed . . . but the international laws; specifically the United Nations Genocide Conventions, isn’t such a soft-touch on genocide of an entire race of people.

Original Article.


White people almost facing stage four genocide.

White people, globally, are facing three of the eight stages that lead to genocide.

Stage 1 is “Classification”; All cultures have categories to distinguish people into “us and them” by ethnicity, race, religion, or nationality . . .

In Western culture if you oppose White genocide anti-Whites scream “racist!” and position themselves as “anti-racist”. They also call themselves “progressive”, and “pro-humanity”, and they call opposition to White genocide “backwards”, “bigoted”, and “not pro-humanity”.

No matter where you go; in courts, in government, in media, in schools – this is the standard that everyone must accept – or they are “them” – a “racist-bigot-nazi”, which in many circumstances can get you beaten up, fired, sued, fined, or harmed in some way.

This is a clear example of an “us and them” mentality that anti-Whites have donned.

Stage 2 is “Symbolization”; we give names or symbols to the groups of people if we can distinguish them from another group; and apply the symbols to members of groups. Classification and symbolization are universally human and do not necessarily result in genocide unless they lead to the next stage, dehumanization.

White people are distinguished A/ by the way we look, and B/ by the fact that our ancestors came from Europe (same DNA).

Stage 3 is “Dehumanization”, where one group denies the humanity of another group, often comparing them to animals, vermin, demons, diseases, etc. At this stage media outlets might be producing propaganda to abuse and vilify the target group.

Author, Susan Sontag said “the White race is the cancer of history”, and Tim Wise said “[White people] you’re on the endangered list. And unlike, say, the bald eagle or some exotic species of muskrat, you are not worth saving.”, in fact there are many, many more quotes like this. Racial epithets like “White devil”, along with all the others, attempts to strip White people of our humanity.

You can read all the countless media reports that talk about “White privilege” – and all of them refuse to dwell in simple logic about why there is this “privilege”.

When you say “there are no racial differences”, well firstly, you are saying that GENOCIDE is impossible, Genos = race, people. Cide = to kill. . . and secondly, you are holding everyone to the same standard.

Now if you are holding everyone to the same standard, and each group does better at certain things either these groups must have some kind of a “privilege” in the fields they do best at . . . or . . . your logic is just plain wrong.

Stage 4, “Organization of genocide”, is slowly coming into effect, where majority White areas are deemed “too White”; referencing Marin County California, and “must become more diverse”.

Anti-Whites have not yet explicitly said that White areas are not diverse, but we know they think this because “diversity” is only every forced onto White areas, and “lack of diversity” is only ever spoken about in White areas.

When anti-Whites start to organize White areas as “problems” that need to be “solved”, then it will be a stage 4 genocide.

The 8 stages of genocide.


EU rules for more White genocide.

EU Judges have ruled that African homosexuals are entitled to “asylum from persecution”. The new law says that anyone who fears discrimination is ellegible to move to Europe.

It is illegal to be homosexual in 38 countries in Africa, however, it is not illegal to be gay in the WHOLE of Africa. In fact there are at least 13 countries where it is legal. Some of those countries where it is legal are: Benin, Cape Verde, Egypt, Mali, Niger, Chad, Gabon, Rwanda, Madagascar, Mozambique, South Africa, and many more.

Now, it doesn’t take a lot of knowledge about human behaviour to know that a lot of Africans are going to pretend to be homosexual, so that they can get in to Europe.

Homosexual Africans could move to those into any one of those African countries quite easily, and they’d be free to do what they want. The “European justice court” is conveniently ignoring those facts, because they have an agenda.

The EU judges claim to be anti-discimination, what they are is anti-White. This whole law is just an scam to get more non-Whites into Europe, so that “assimilation” can take place and “mixing the races” (but ONLY in White countries) can go full speed ahead.

Anti-discimination, anti-racist, anti-facist – they’re nothing more than codewords for anti-White.

Original Article.


Russia: 10,000 march against a prerequisite of White genocide

When the law won’t stand against illegal immigration it’s up to the people. 10,000 of them, in fact, in what’s being dubbed the “Russian March”.

Many are unhappy with the amount of illegal immigrants in Moscow, despite the Moscow police chief calling on a “militia” force of citizens to catch them and turn them in to the authorities.

A statement from the Moscow police said “Police at the event detained about 30 people for the use of masks, minor violations of public order, shouting Nazi slogans and the use of banned symbols”.

However, the story is not the same as that in other White countries, Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, came out criticizing massive immigration saying “Russia does not need immigrants; immigrants need Russia”.

The Original Article (In Russian)


US: Unemployment 7.3%, but “more immigrants please!” The reason?

The US unemployment rate is 7.3%, but in an article by we discover what a large group of varied businesses want; A/ To lay off thousands of their currently employed workers, and B/ the quick passage of an immigration reform bill.

These businesses are ones like General Electric, The Walt Disney Company, Marriott International, Hilton Worldwide, Hyatt Hotels Corporation, McDonald’s Corporation, The Wendy’s Company, Coca-Cola, The Cheesecake Factory, Johnson & Johnson, Verizon Communications, Hewlett-Packard, General Mills, and many more.

The corporate officers say “A new immigration law would be long a overdue step towards our nation’s immigration policies with its workforce needs at all skill levels to ensure U.S. global competitiveness.

They continue “immigration reform should address the reality that there is a global war for talent.” The way for the United States to win that war for talent, they say, is more immigration.

Well that’s pretty dang strange, every White country does not technically count as “global”, unless you’re anti-White and calling for “mixing the races”.

Rising economies like China or Japan do not have a foreign workforce because they don’t want to get rid of their own people; the point here is that you ONLY see this “global competitiveness” for immigrants in White countries, pushed by anti-Whites.

There is a reason big business does not call for more immigration in non-White countries, it’s because the governments of those non-White countries care about their identity as individual races, elasticities, etc.

In other words, businesses have no loyalty to you, but they want you to have (customer) loyalty to them.

That is exactly what multiculturalism says: We have no loyalty to you, but we demand loyalty of you.

When they say immigrants, what they mean is non-Whites.

The old anti-White line is that “immigrants are harder working than Whites”. This may be true or it may be a lie, but the thing they missed is that when you replace White people for exactly that reason, it’s genocide. Simple as 1-2-3.

It doesn’t matter for what reason you justify genocide; genocide means that the future world will have no more of a certain kind of people.

The original article.


Ireland: “Whites must change to welcome non-Whites”.

In an article written by, a Professor Jeffrey Alexander is to have said “For migrant groups to win a place in society the main culture has to come to admire the other culture and possibly change”.

Prof. Alexander continued “There has to be a kind of mutual seduction, and immigrants have to write novels that are best-sellers, and open restaurants”.

“While Polish migrants have many of the characteristics that are admired such as being Catholic, well-mannered, and hard-working, migrants such as those from Somalia seem so utterly different in being Muslim, in their dress, and their traditions”.

He noted that Islam and Muslim culture are not core parts of European societies, and went on to say “there had to be dramatic movements . . . which allow people in the center of society to identify with them”.

Actually, he is correct, White people will have to change to allow White genocide to proceed.
Generally, as a survival instinct, people try to preserve themselves and their customs; this is achieved with a homeland.

When someone attempts to remove a group from their homeland, that is for all legal definitions – genocide.

My point here is that when anti-Whites say White countries and White people should “change”, what they mean is White countries and White people should become mixed race.

If you were to go to Australia and demand the Aboriginals “change”, that would be internationally recognized as genocide, in fact this is not just my ramblings, Aboriginals were encouraged to mix and it was recognized as genocide.

This professor seems to have taken his influence from Obama; anyone remember Obama’s “Change” campaign?

The point of it was that Obama was Black and the nation was transitioning from “a racist White country” to an “anti-racist mixed race country”.

Ireland, I’m sure you could ask most U.S. voters today if this “change” is really worth it.

Original story here