Congressman speaks out against “war on Whites”.

173492444-rep-mo-brooks-speaks-during-the-dc-march-for-jobs-in.jpg.CROP.promovar-mediumlarge

The Republican congressman for Alabama, Mo Brooks, said in a radio interview last week that there is a war on White people, which is being waged by the Democratic party, reported Huffingtonpost.com.

This is a part of the war on whites that’s being launched by the Democratic Party. And the way in which they’re launching this war is by claiming that whites hate everybody else,

It’s part of the strategy that Barack Obama implemented in 2008, continued in 2012, where he divides us all on race, on sex, greed, envy, class warfare, all those kinds of things. Well that’s not true.

Brooks was responding to an audio clip which warned that the GOP could not survive as the “party of white people.

In a separate interview with AL.com, Brooks spoke more about his comments.

It’s much like the congressmen during the [immigration] debate on Friday: Democrat after Democrat was talking racism and race,

It’s high time folks started calling out the Democrats for their racial appeals. Certainly if you were to flip the coin and a white person were to say vote for me because I’m white, it would be an uproar and deservedly so. So why do we allow blacks to say vote for me because I’m black or Hispanics vote for me because I’m Hispanic?

The Congressman is right, there is a war on Whites, but one political party is not to blame.

Because of the opened borders policy in the US, the country is becoming increasingly non-White, and all these non-Whites are going to vote for the parties which can bring more of their own people into the country.

The larger issue here is that immigration and integration is forced on White countries by law. Integration is the polar opposite of segregation, because instead of races being legally required to separate, they are legally required to mix. This is more popularly known as “diversity”.

As this immigration and “diversity” is being forced on White countries, it amounts to a policy of White genocide.

Share

Anti-White Media: Norwegian College not advertising to White people.

1

Apparently, White Norwegians don’t go to college according to this advert produced by a college in Oslo.

Colleges and Universities are particularly anti-White places to be, because on the one hand they will deny that race exists or is important, but on the other hand it is unacceptable for a college to be “too White”.

This advert specifically chose to feature no White people because it does not want to advertise to White people. If they didn’t want to make this about race they would have included all races, but instead they exclude White people, therefore they are saying they have enough of White people, and they advertise specifically to non-Whites because they want more.

This is not just something exclusive to this college…a while ago, a college in the USA said it wanted to hire more non-Whites, so it featured only non-White people in their adverts.

Could you imagine if a college advert in China decided to include no Chinese, or no Asians people at all? It would not be an accident, it would be a deliberate decision made by whomever was making the advert.

This is only a small puzzle piece and we should not obsess too much about this. The larger picture is one of White genocide across the globe.

White Genocide is carried out by first opening the borders of White countries, and flooding them with millions of non-White immigrants. Then, the next step is to force “diversity” on every White area. Adverts such as these, serve the latter step.

Share

UK: Left-wing economist admits mass immigration is “mostly negative”.

wgb

Professor Robert Rowthorn, a Professor of Economics at Cambridge University in England and self-professed marxist, has admitted that mass immigration damages the UK, and all contributions to the economy they make are “unlikely to be very large“.

Rowthorn, who conducted a report for think-tank Civitas, found that there may be no economic benefits gained from immigration at all.

The effects of mass immigration “are mostly negative for the existing population of the UK and their descendants” he said.

Unrestrained population growth would eventually have a negative impact on the standard of living through its environmental effects such as overcrowding, congestion and loss of amenity.

Such losses would ultimately outweigh the small gain in average wages apparently resulting from mass immigration.

If many of the immigrants fail to get jobs, or if they end up in low skill jobs or displace native workers, large-scale immigration will have a negative impact on GDP per capita and on government finances,

The impact could be positive or negative but either way it is unlikely to be very large. The only thing that is certain is that immigration on the present scale, if it continues, will lead to much faster population growth and a much larger total GDP than would otherwise be the case, with consequent pressure on infrastructure and the environment.

Unskilled workers have suffered some reduction in their wages due to competition from immigrants,

Even on optimistic assumptions, the economic and fiscal gains for existing inhabitants and their descendants from large-scale immigration are small in comparison to its impact on population growth

If all these immigrants are so great, why is it that all White countries ‘need’ to have them, and why is it that non-White third-world countries are not trying to hold onto their population?

Immigration was never about the economy. It was partially about votes, and partially about “diversity” (but only in White countries).

White countries are called upon by those in power to have unrestricted non-White migration.

When there are a sufficient amount of non-White people in a White country, anti-Whites start talking about how non-White areas are “diverse”, “vibrant”, and “exciting”, and how White areas are “boring”.

This usually leads to forced “diversity”, which means that no area can legally be “too White”.

When these conditions are forced on White countries, it proves that turning White people into a minority is the intent of those in power. This is White genocide.

Share

Anti-White media: British kids are minority White.

School uniform adverts in Britain have a record-breaking amount of non-White kids advertising their clothes this year.

1

article-2066534-0B00E071000005DC-389_468x286

hi-school0_1588999c rathfern_playground_MCH_3715-e1354203768151 image aldi-school-unifor_2621008b asdaPA_228x340

These adverts are not just from one company, they are from many companies. The media at large is anti-White because they are deliberately choosing to represent White children as minorities in most of their adverts.

It would be tempting to call this a conspiracy, but more bizarrely, it is in actual fact a religion. You may have heard it called “political correctness”.

The leaders of this “political correctness” religion tell people what to do, and if they don’t do it, they accuse them of “racism” or “hate”.

This is similar to Christianity during the Middle Ages, where the people were told by the “leaders” of Christianity what to do, or else they would be called a “heretic” or “possessed by the devil”.

The “leaders” of political correctness are anti-White because they demand that White countries around the planet have open borders, and forced “diversity” – these conditions constitute a genocide against White people.

It’s genocide because anti-Whites are well aware that White people are becoming a minority as a result of these policies, but they refuse to remove these policies. This proves that their intent is to turn majority White countries into minority White countries.

So that’s why “diversity” is a code word for White genocide.

Share

Swedish government to legally deny race exists.

280b3834ad547bbc48e5c947d68c5c390bffc1add7f4168e452a65212a9f21b8

We know that different human races actually do not exist,” Swedish Integration Minister, Erik Ullenhag said on Swedish TV.

We also know that the fundamental grounds of racism are based on the belief that there are different races, and that belonging to a race makes people behave in a certain way, and that some races are better than others.

Legislation should not include the word race, if we argue that there are not actually races,” Ullenhag said. “I have wanted to remove the concept of race for a long time.

Oscar Pripp, associate professor of ethnology at Uppsala University said “It sounds rather sensible, not to scrap the word entirely, but that it should not be included as a concept in legislation, because then you’re saying that there are indeed different races.

To be a forensic scientist, you must be able to take DNA from a crime scene and from that, be able to work out what race the DNA belonged to. However, to keep your job as a forensic scientist, you must deny that race exists otherwise social scientists will scream “racist” and get you fired.

A black man, Kitimbwa Sabuni, who is a spokesperson for the Afro-Swedish Association said “This scientific racism that Ullenhag is focused on, when he says that racism is based on believing in different races, is not true,

How many people in Sweden really think that way? Maybe 100. That’s not the problem. Racism existed before the concept of race biology. Scientific racism is just one chapter in the story of race and racism.

Just because it’s a social construction doesn’t mean it’s not a reality. For us, this is just trying to take away the possibility to even talk about it. It’s critical.

Sabuni is worried because “anti-racism” is an industry that makes money. He is worried because this new policy might stop “anti-racist” campaigns from receiving government funding.

The Swedish government has assigned chief district court Judge Erica Hemtke to remove all mentions of race from Swedish law, which is predicted to be finished by 2016.

The thing I’d like to know is, if race is no longer legally recognized, does this mean that no area in Sweden can be accused of being “too White”?

Does this mean that tiny White towns and villages no longer will have to be forced to accept “diversity” because they’re “too White?

I don’t think so. The Swedish government wants White genocide, and is working to turn the White Swedes into a minority in their own home country.

Share

August STOP WHITE GENOCIDE message displayed at White House needs your initials

Please click on the title and add two initials to this. You can also use only initials for your first and last name.

150 initials will make it visible at the White House.

This is part of our keeping our memes and phrases visible in all available venues.

Please consider becoming a Stalwart and a Rockin’ Robin! :)

STOP WHITE GENOCIDE, by halting MASSIVE third world immigration and FORCED assimilation in White countries

Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White countries for EVERYBODY?

ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with third world non-whites, and Whites are forced by law to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

That’s genocide by UN Convention:

“Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”

Diversity is just a code word for White Genocide!

We petition the President to take a stand against White Genocide in the United States, and to call for its end in Britain, Europe, Canada, New Zealand, and Australia.

Supporting White Genocide is not anti-racist. It’s anti-white!

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

—-

goo.gl/3SY5n

Let’s grow

 

Share

Poll: 77% of Americans say illegal immigrants should be sent home.

immigration6a

A poll conducted by today.yougov.com has found that 77% of the American public want the illegal immigrant children sent home. Only 11% wanted them to stay.

The approval rating of the president on immigration, like his approval ratings on many other issues, is negative. A majority disapproves, and only a third approve.

But the evaluation of the president is even worse among those who would deport the child migrants as soon as possible: only 16 percent in that group approve of how Barack Obama is handling immigration.” said the poll analysts.

White Genocide is well on its way in the USA. White children are currently the minority in 10 US states.

When Senator Ted Kennedy was speaking to the Senate about the Immigration Act of 1965, persuading them to open the borders of the United States he said nothing but lies:

The bill will not flood our cities with immigrants. It will not upset the ethnic mix of our society. It will not relax the standards of admission. It will not cause American workers to lose their jobs.

Since that day, Americans have been fed a diet of lies upon lies. It’s time for the truth: White Genocide is ongoing to this day, and turning White people in America and other countries across the planet into the minority group.

Diversity is a code for White genocide.

Share

Denmark’s largest opposition party wants to slow Muslim immigration.

ff6a721f564c0c73f301ef6fd53d89bb7961fda5e10574aedde905e821598ead

Venstre, which is Denmark’s largest party opposed to the current left-wing government, is calling for differences to be taken into account when allowing immigrants into the country.

It is not necessary to set the same requirements for everyone, because as a general rule there is a big difference in the ability and will to integrate between a Christian American or Swede and a Muslim Somali or Pakistani,” Inger Støjberg, Venstre’s political spokeswoman, wrote in the Berlingske newspaper according to thelocal.dk.

To say it directly, it is primarily Muslim immigrants who do not value democracy and freedom. In certain environments, they directly oppose it,

Too many non-Western immigrants with Muslim backgrounds do not want our freedom-orientated society model.

In the future we should make it easier for those who traditionally can and will integrate to come to Denmark, while we make it more difficult for those who don’t have the ability or the will” Støjberg concluded.

Martin Henriksen from the Danish People’s Party (DF) was pleased to see Venstre’s approach.

“If Venstre has now finally understood the need to differentiate between immigrants and limit non-Western immigration, then we are getting closer to each other,” DF’s Martin Henriksen wrote in a press release.

If cultural compatibility doesn’t concern you then you might be interested to know that the Danish government published a report that found “non-Western” (non-White) immigration cost Denmark €2.3 billion in the last 10 years, whereas “Western” (White) immigration contributed €295 million.

The country is now paying foreigners to return to their country of origin, this will reduce the amount of Turkish immigrants, who are needed back in Turkey.

The mass non-White immigration and forced “diversity” into ONLY White countries is not about money – it’s about White genocide.

The conditions in place on White countries are turning us into a minority. This is by design because all anti-Whites acknowledge that White people are becoming a minority as a result of their policies, but they say we are not allowed to remove those policies.

They say they are anti-racist, but anti-racist is a code for anti-White. It’s a code for anti-White, because “anti-racists” widely agree that “racist” = “White”, and “White” = “racist”.

Share

Norway: “Human rights” group wants to stop immigration.

3a04605b1352c04346d185e49799b796

Most of you have probably heard the expression that if you want to boil a frog in milk, put it in the pan before it boils then boil it, otherwise it will jump out. Some anti-Whites in Norway realize this is true about mass non-White immigration and diversity – the key elements of White genocide.

Rita Karlsen, is the general manager of “Human Rights Services“, a Norwegian organization which aims to integrate immigrants into Norway.

On the website, Aftenposten.no, she published an article where she explained that people in Oslo are becoming upset from the massive increase of immigrants into the city over the last few years.

Oslo continues to grow at record speed, a growth that is immigrant-related and where more and more areas and schools in Oslo, the majority of the population has an immigrant background, especially non-Western.” she writes.

Karlsen explains that the city is becoming more non-White because firstly, many White people are moving out of the city, and secondly, non-White immigration is increasing. This is similar to the UK, where 600,000 White people moved out of London in the last decade.

There seems to be an unpleasant but nonetheless real tendency that the [more people] with non-Western backgrounds in a district, the higher the emigration of people with Norwegian background. And while the population of Norwegian origin decreases very rapidly, [those of a] non-western background [increases] about as fast.

It is a known fact that immigrants in Oslo are unevenly distributed among neighborhoods [...] We therefore argue that segregation is increasing in Oslo…

A report found that 57 of the 129 primary (elementary) and secondary (high) schools in Oslo, the majority were composed of “linguistic minorities”.

20 of these have less than a third of pupils with Norwegian as their mother tongue, and six have between 91 and 98 percent minority students.” says Karlsen.

She says that government attitudes towards immigration and integration “cause them to no longer have any popular support.”

Immigration to Oslo is not sustainable [...] the city should lawfully, get a temporary halt on immigration.

“Human Rights Services” conducted a report titled “Segregation, Diversity and Integration – focusing on Oslo’s districts and school.“.

In the report it predicts that because of immigration Norwegians are likely to become a minority in Oslo in 16 years time, where 7 districts out of 15 total districts are predicted to have a Norwegian minority.

The report looks further into the future and predicts that by 2100, Norway’s population will grow from 5.1 million to 14 million, and of these 14 million, 4.5 million will be non-White.

During the 60′s, 70′s, and 80′s when all the mass non-White immigration started, very few people predicted that it would go this far. If you told people who hundreds of cities around the planet were going to become minority White, you would probably be called a “scare-monger”. No one could see the White genocide that was in motion.

White genocide first started with the slow, but steady opening of White countries borders. This allows non-White immigrants to pour into White countries, turning us into a minority.

However, the majority of non-White immigrants are not interested in going to rural areas – instead preferring to stick to well-developed cities.

What this would mean is, the cities would be non-White and the rural areas would be White. But because anti-Whites desire to turn White people into a minority EVERYWHERE, they must push for “diversity“.

When they speak of “diversity” the mean that no area can be “too White”, and areas which are “too White” must immediately give special benefits to non-White people to encourage them to move in.

In a nutshell, diversity means chasing down White people – it is a codeword for White genocide, because White people are deliberately becoming a minority as a result of these policies.

Share

Former Reagan Appointee to Discuss White Genocide on Paltalk Live This Saturday

This Saturday July 26th on Paltalk (Link here: goo.gl/WV0vHf) @ 5pm ET – Robert W. Whitaker, former Reagan appointee, a 5 year Capitol Hill Senior Staffer and author of three successful books on politics will be hosting an unprecedented discussion/debate on White Genocide.

The live chat is unprecedented because it is the first known acknowledgement of White Genocide by any American presidential appointee. It should be an interesting discussion.

White Genocide is outlined on this site:

 Moving millions of non-White immigrants into traditionally White countries over a period of years. This alone is not genocide, but the next step makes it a part of genocide.

 Legally chasing down and forcing White areas to accept “diversity“. This is known as “Forced Assimilation“.

A combination of mass immigration (of different groups of people) plus forced assimilation would qualify as genocide, as defined by Article II, part (C) of the United Nations Genocide Conventions:

Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.

 Government refusal to remove genocidal policies that are in place today. By keeping these policies in place, they ensure that the genocide is ongoing.

Society is widely aware that White people are becoming a minority in several countries, but anti-Whites don’t want us to bring an end to the policies which are turning us into a minority everywhere.

Share