EU rules for more White genocide.

EU Judges have ruled that African homosexuals are entitled to “asylum from persecution”. The new law says that anyone who fears discrimination is ellegible to move to Europe.

It is illegal to be homosexual in 38 countries in Africa, however, it is not illegal to be gay in the WHOLE of Africa. In fact there are at least 13 countries where it is legal. Some of those countries where it is legal are: Benin, Cape Verde, Egypt, Mali, Niger, Chad, Gabon, Rwanda, Madagascar, Mozambique, South Africa, and many more.

Now, it doesn’t take a lot of knowledge about human behaviour to know that a lot of Africans are going to pretend to be homosexual, so that they can get in to Europe.

Homosexual Africans could move to those into any one of those African countries quite easily, and they’d be free to do what they want. The “European justice court” is conveniently ignoring those facts, because they have an agenda.

The EU judges claim to be anti-discimination, what they are is anti-White. This whole law is just an scam to get more non-Whites into Europe, so that “assimilation” can take place and “mixing the races” (but ONLY in White countries) can go full speed ahead.

Anti-discimination, anti-racist, anti-facist – they’re nothing more than codewords for anti-White.

Original Article.


Russia: 10,000 march against a prerequisite of White genocide

When the law won’t stand against illegal immigration it’s up to the people. 10,000 of them, in fact, in what’s being dubbed the “Russian March”.

Many are unhappy with the amount of illegal immigrants in Moscow, despite the Moscow police chief calling on a “militia” force of citizens to catch them and turn them in to the authorities.

A statement from the Moscow police said “Police at the event detained about 30 people for the use of masks, minor violations of public order, shouting Nazi slogans and the use of banned symbols”.

However, the story is not the same as that in other White countries, Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, came out criticizing massive immigration saying “Russia does not need immigrants; immigrants need Russia”.

The Original Article (In Russian)


US: Unemployment 7.3%, but “more immigrants please!” The reason?

The US unemployment rate is 7.3%, but in an article by we discover what a large group of varied businesses want; A/ To lay off thousands of their currently employed workers, and B/ the quick passage of an immigration reform bill.

These businesses are ones like General Electric, The Walt Disney Company, Marriott International, Hilton Worldwide, Hyatt Hotels Corporation, McDonald’s Corporation, The Wendy’s Company, Coca-Cola, The Cheesecake Factory, Johnson & Johnson, Verizon Communications, Hewlett-Packard, General Mills, and many more.

The corporate officers say “A new immigration law would be long a overdue step towards our nation’s immigration policies with its workforce needs at all skill levels to ensure U.S. global competitiveness.

They continue “immigration reform should address the reality that there is a global war for talent.” The way for the United States to win that war for talent, they say, is more immigration.

Well that’s pretty dang strange, every White country does not technically count as “global”, unless you’re anti-White and calling for “mixing the races”.

Rising economies like China or Japan do not have a foreign workforce because they don’t want to get rid of their own people; the point here is that you ONLY see this “global competitiveness” for immigrants in White countries, pushed by anti-Whites.

There is a reason big business does not call for more immigration in non-White countries, it’s because the governments of those non-White countries care about their identity as individual races, elasticities, etc.

In other words, businesses have no loyalty to you, but they want you to have (customer) loyalty to them.

That is exactly what multiculturalism says: We have no loyalty to you, but we demand loyalty of you.

When they say immigrants, what they mean is non-Whites.

The old anti-White line is that “immigrants are harder working than Whites”. This may be true or it may be a lie, but the thing they missed is that when you replace White people for exactly that reason, it’s genocide. Simple as 1-2-3.

It doesn’t matter for what reason you justify genocide; genocide means that the future world will have no more of a certain kind of people.

The original article.


Ireland: “Whites must change to welcome non-Whites”.

In an article written by, a Professor Jeffrey Alexander is to have said “For migrant groups to win a place in society the main culture has to come to admire the other culture and possibly change”.

Prof. Alexander continued “There has to be a kind of mutual seduction, and immigrants have to write novels that are best-sellers, and open restaurants”.

“While Polish migrants have many of the characteristics that are admired such as being Catholic, well-mannered, and hard-working, migrants such as those from Somalia seem so utterly different in being Muslim, in their dress, and their traditions”.

He noted that Islam and Muslim culture are not core parts of European societies, and went on to say “there had to be dramatic movements . . . which allow people in the center of society to identify with them”.

Actually, he is correct, White people will have to change to allow White genocide to proceed.
Generally, as a survival instinct, people try to preserve themselves and their customs; this is achieved with a homeland.

When someone attempts to remove a group from their homeland, that is for all legal definitions – genocide.

My point here is that when anti-Whites say White countries and White people should “change”, what they mean is White countries and White people should become mixed race.

If you were to go to Australia and demand the Aboriginals “change”, that would be internationally recognized as genocide, in fact this is not just my ramblings, Aboriginals were encouraged to mix and it was recognized as genocide.

This professor seems to have taken his influence from Obama; anyone remember Obama’s “Change” campaign?

The point of it was that Obama was Black and the nation was transitioning from “a racist White country” to an “anti-racist mixed race country”.

Ireland, I’m sure you could ask most U.S. voters today if this “change” is really worth it.

Original story here


Latvia: “Follow the money”? Nope! “Follow the Whitey”.

In this Google translated article, it is said that five hundred Chinese families are ready to emmigrate to Latvia.

“This year will see the relocation of 500 families from China [to Latvia]” Radio Baltkom said to Professor Leons Taivāns.

Commenting on Latvian immigration Professor Taivāns replied “The Chinese are very active in moving to Latvia – this year alone, 500 [Chinese] families [have immigrated]. We are absolutely not ready. The families move with their children who have no schools to learn at, because we do not have multi-lingual schools . . . it would be necessary to introduce education in three languages – Russian, Latvian, and English”.

Professor Taivāns noted that Oriental immigrants do not want to learn the Latvian language because it is not globally popular.

He went on to say that the Chinese were “very industrious with a high capacity for work”.

“Five hundred families” does not sound like that many, but remember, Latvia is a small country.

With that said, it is time to expose the anti-White argument.

Latvia is not a rich country in comparison to Japan, China, and other Asian countries. So why is it that Latvia must be ready for immigration?

Surely it would be cheaper, and more “enviromentally friendly” to only move the Chinese a small distance to a richer country like Japan? Moving all those Chinese people on a plane or boat half way around the world uses a lot of fuel, surely?

Why is it that the Chinese are not allowed to completely flood into Japan, or other Asian countries, or Black countries, or Muslim countries?

What is so special about Latvia? Well it’s simple, and you should know by now: Latvia is full of White people!

These are facts that we know:

All White countries must have open borders.
All White countries must become “multi-cultural” (multi-racial).
All White countries must accept the above.

Moving all these non-White people into ONLY White countries has to have some kind of a motive, right?

You bet’cha it does: White genocide. If a country, city, or town, is considered “too White” by “the experts”, it is prepared to recieve non-White immigration, and then policies are put in place to encourage, and in some cases force, assimilation.

There is one question that I can answer with absoloute confidence: What would we call these “experts”?

Answer: Anti-White.

When anti-Whites scream about how rich White countries are, they are using that as a justification to commit genocide against White people . . . but in poor White countries, they use the fact that they’re poor for a justification to commit White genocide.

Their reasons mean nothing – we all know it’s just because the country’s got White people in it.

The original translated article


White South Africans worried about genocidal mass killings of Whites.


“A section of the White population in South Africa is preparing for the worst scenario in case aging former South African President Nelson Mandela passes away. The national evacuation plan over possible genocide was drafted almost a decade ago.

Since 1994, when South Africa issued its first Black government with Nelson Mandela at the helm of its power, over three thousand White South African farmers are said to have been murdered…”


Pentagon’s “Mein anti-racist kampf” Manual

The leadership of the Pentagon seem to be big fans of the Nazi regime. In fact if you read their new 637 page manual, specifically the bit about “White privilege” you can see the Pentagon being a bit of a copy-cat.

The subject of White privilege emerged in a 20-page section titled, “Power and Privilege.”

Here are just a few excerps:

• “Whites are the empowered group,”
• “White males represent the haves as compared to the have-nots.”
• “assume racism is everywhere, every day”
• “notice code words for race.”
• “understand and learn from the history of whiteness”
• “the unfair economic advantages and disadvantages created long ago by institutions for whites, males, Christians, etc. still affect socioeconomic privilege today,”

If you were to replace the word “White”, with the word “Jewish”, you would have Hitler’s Mein Kampf or some other Nazi regime publication.

So let’s do it now as a demonstration:

• “Jews are the empowered group,” – to say that would be anti-semitic.
• “Jewish males represent the haves” – to say that would be anti-semitic.
• “assume Judaism is everywhere, every day” – to say that would be anti-semitic.
• “notice code words for Jewish.” – to say that would be anti-semitic.
• “understand and learn from the history of Judaism” – to say that, in that context, would be anti-semitic.

If fact if you took this manual and actually did replace the word “White” with the word “Jewish”, or “Black”, or “Asian”, you would have a “hate manual”, in the words of anti-White – it would probably be burnt to a cinder.

The reason why you are allowed to say such things about White people is because we are not classed as a “protected” group. In other words, White people are a “problem” that needs to be “solved”.

If any of you can remember, some while back a group of anti-White professors were trying to get White school students to wear “White privilege wristbands”, to remind Whites of their “unfair advantage”.

Does anyone else now see how similar Anti-White’s schemes are getting to Nazi Germany’s?

Considering that the government takes our tax money to pay these people, we can see that this is the goal of the government.

Anti-Whites oppose Hitler, but they don’t oppose what he did – they oppose WHO he did it too.

Anti-Whites all agree that a majority White area is “too White”; Obama force-assimilated Marin county, California, for exactly that reason. Countless other White communities have been “enriched” for exactly that reason.

Now that those previously White communities have no White people left in them they are “diverse enough”.

Diversity is just a codeword for anti-White.