All In The Family Or All The Family In?

Onyango “Omar” Obama, the President’s uncle who has defied deportation orders, has been granted residency status, also known as a green card, by Judge Leonard Shapiro, the same judge who granted a similar ruling for the President’s welfare queen aunt, Zeituni. Image Hosted by

Despite having run down a police officer in a drunk driving incident and possessing a driver’s license that could not have been obtained legally, Shapiro called Oyyango “a gentleman.”

At the hearing Onyango contradicted the White House’s assertion that the President had never met his uncle, stating that Barack had lived with him for three weeks while he attended Harvard Law School.

Judge Leonard Shapiro based his decision on a 1972 law that allows long term residents to stay. He gave no reason why this law trumps a court order nor did he issue a written opinion.

Reprint from


Are Tibetans who oppose their genocide “Tibetan Supremacists”?

Our STOP WHITE GENOCIDE mini-Mantras (“petitions”) that will be on public display at the White House during December are ready for your initials…just click on their titles!

Anyone who isn’t yet a Stalwart, please become one!


Are Tibetans who oppose their genocide “Tibetan Supremacists”?

Millions of Chinese are pouring into Tibet and forcing the Tibetans to integrate with them so that the Tibetans will “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

Are Tibetans who oppose this genocide “Tibetan supremacists”?

ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with millions of non-whites, and Whites are forced to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.

But if I call for open discussion of this genocide of my race, the White race, I’m called a “White supremacist.”

Please issue a statement that “White supremacist” is a hate word that anti-whites hide behind to carry out White Genocide!

They say they’re anti-racist, but what they are is anti-white!

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.


Save the white-tailed deer!

The environmentally different valleys of the Great Smokey Mtns have produced different varieties of white-tailed deer.

If those different varieties are mixed together to live in the same area, they’ll interbreed to eventually become just one single “variety” of white-tailed deer.

The same result will occur if humans are all mixed together.

The promotion of diversity everywhere in the world will end diversity.

But wait! Anti-whites are massively mixing the world’s races together ONLY IN WHITE COUNTRIES!

We urge the President to use his power and influence to save both the white-tailed deer and the White race!

Anti-whites who are carrying out the present White Genocide say they’re anti-racist. What they are is ANTI-WHITE.

Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.




[This petition has been removed by the mods at the petition site]

Declare “HATE” to be a hate word used to carry out WHITE GENOCIDE!

Do you oppose affirmative action?

You’re a “hater”!

Do you prefer to live in a crime-free White community?

You’re a “hater”!

Do you oppose the flooding of White countries worldwide with third-world non-whites, and Whites being forced by law to assimilate with them and be blended out of existence?

You’re a “hater”!

Anti-whites, livid with hate for me and my race, snarl “hater” at me when I do or say anything that slows their steady march of genocide against the White race.

Declare “Hater,” “bigot,” “racist,” “supremacist,” to be hate words used by anti-whites to cloak their program of White Genocide!

They say they’re anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.


For a future with White children


Short URL’s for the “petitions”:


[To click on links to our  STOP WHITE GENOCIDE messages that are currently on public display at the White House, click on the blue, animated "Stalwarts...first of the month" icon in the right hand margin of our pages]


“Diversity training” for stating the truth.


Councillor Jeffrey Tucker

Councillor Jeffrey Tucker, a member of Havering Council, a district in London has said that merging a “95%” White workforce from Havering Council with a “95%” non-White workforce from the Newham Council is a “terrible idea”.

At a council cabinet meeting Tucker said “I can’t see the two councils being able to work together. It would be like putting two football [soccer] teams together – an African team and an English team – and saying: ‘Get on and work together’.”

Tucker didn’t explicitly say it, but he clearly understands that the majority non-White staff and White staff will not be able to work together.

The majority non-White Newham council staff is responsible for the public sanitation of Newham, and Tucker pointed out that Newham was full of ‘filthy streets’ and ‘unwashed windows’.

He added: “The ethnic change will be too quick for us to absorb and get used to. We need a bit more time.

“It’s going to make it very difficult, awkward and uncomfortable for both sides and I think it’s too soon.”

“You look at the streets and they are filthy. You look at the shops and they aren’t clean like our shops . . . We are putting our well-run council at risk.”

The 2011 census data reports that Havering’s population is 83 per cent white British, while Newham’s population is 17 per cent white British.

The proposed merger of council staff would be just the small picture of forcing White people to live and work with non-Whites, which is forced assimilation; one of the main conditions of White genocide.

Andrew Boff, the London Assembly’s Conservative group leader, was “dumbstruck” by what Tucker said, and demanded he be given some “diversity” training immediately.

Of course, by “diverisity training”, what Boff means is essentially brainwashing and guilt tripping Tucker into accepting White genocide.

Boff said it was “deeply offensive; I can’t understand why in 2013 this councillor seems to think that an attitude that separates people because of race is OK.”

Meanwhile on planet Earth, anti-Whites separate people because of their race every day. The race problem, or as it’s more commonly known the “diversity” problem, is ONLY refering to one race of people, White people.

Boff continued, “Havering is getting more diverse, and he needs to buck up his ideas. His comments must be terribly offensive to people in his ward with African heritage.”

Roger Reid, a citizen of Newham, said “This man [councillor Tucker] needs more than diversity training . . . we are not living in the 19th century, which is where this man belongs.”

Reid believes in the idea of the “mixed race future” (but only in White countries). In fact if you are politically correct you must promote a “mixed race future” (but again, only in White countries).

Tucker later goes on the defensive saying his comments weren’t “about race at all – I just think Havering isn’t ready for the level of diversity already present in Newham – that’s all.”

It’s a pity someone didn’t tell him anti-racist is just a codeword for anti-White – he could have told THEM that and throw the accusation back in their faces! When anti-Whites talk about “diversity”, what they imagine is a whole world without a single White person in it.

When anti-Whites talk about “mixing THE races”, what they imagine is Asian people in Asia, Black people in Africa, Muslim people in the Middle East, Jews in Israel . . . and where White people used to be – these “rainbow nations” of brown skinned, brown haired, brown eyed people.



Obama biography: Racist is a codeword for White.

Jane Sutcliffe, the author of President Obama’s biography has received criticism over one particular passage in her book in which she implies White people to be “racist”.

“Barack Obama”, a book studied by at least one fourth-grade class, is the at the attention of critics after one passage read “but some people said Americans weren’t ready for that much change. Sure Barack was a nice fellow, they said. But white voters would never vote for a black president.”

Founder of the “conservative Education action group foundation” Kyle Olson said the book teaches children that White people didn’t want a Black president, and is implied that it’s because White people are “racist”.

When Olson was asked if the sentence could also be interpreted as simply noting that some people said that white voters would be racist, he agreed but said that the subtle nature of the passage could be understood by fourth-graders as meaning that White people are the problem – the “racists”.

Most of the book is publicly available for free from Google Books.

Anti-Whites say that any race can be “racist”, but they act like ONLY White people are “racist”.

Modern day history doesn’t teach kids the reality about how all races and groups of people have done horrible things, about how all races have killed, raped, enslaved, and stolen land . . . modern history is basically just a class in how White people are “evil Nazis & KKK who want to kill everyone”.

Anti-Whites teach these kind of anti-White bias to children, so that children will be more accepting — of White genocide.

“Racist” is a codeword for White – because anti-racist is now nothing more than a codeword for anti-White.



Stick it you know where!

No, not there! And not any place where it’s not legal to put a sticker.

That leaves a lot of places you can beautify with these phrases:

 Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, White countries for EVERYBODY?

Anti-Racist is a Code Word for Anti-White


White GeNOcide!

Coming soon: a section devoted to stickers, fliers, banners, etc., and how to get them in your hands easily.

Here’s that section:

Some of you will know how to use that section to make yourself stickers, fliers, or  banners.

I and many others don’t have the technical knowledge to know how to use that section, so I’ll see if I can get the fellow who’s handling it to improve it for us “dummies”

 If you have experience, knowledge, links on this topic, please share!


80th Anniversary of Ukrainian Holodomor

This year marks the 80th anniversary of the Ukrainian Holodomor, a program of genocide by forced starvation, now internationally recognized by many countries as genocide.

November the 25th is the Holodomor remembrance day in Ukraine. It remembers the genocide by forced starvation of mostly Ukrainian peasants. This was caused by the Soviet Union, under Joseph Stalin’s rule, deliberately inflating the price of grain which is estimated to have left from 2 million to 10 million dead from starvation and birth defects as a result of starvation.

It is argued by some scholars that the Holodomor, which took place from 1932 to 1933, was a heavy-handed Soviet attempt to suppress Ukrainian nationalists against Soviet rule.

“Holodomor” translates from Ukrainian as “death by hunger” or “starved to death”, and thirteen international countries now recognize it to be a genocide against Ukraine.

Slavka Shoulakewych a member of Alberta’s chapter of the Ukrainian-Canadian Congress, said she hopes the 80th anniversary year will shed light on an often unknown atrocity in world history.

“It was a forced famine to force farmers into collectivization. Stalin had a program in which he wanted to force farmers into collective farming,” said Shoulakewych.

She said, for many years after the genocide, the Soviet Union made it illegal to recognize the event, and even now, many people only know about the tragedy if they personally knew someone directly affected by the forced famine.

A 2011 documentary “Genocide Revealed”, has collected evidence to show that Stalin and his supporters deliberately targeted Ukrainians, as a form of genocide.

The USA, Canada, Mexico, Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Australia, Italy, Spain, Netherlands, Greece, Poland, and other countries across the globe – non of them within Asia, Africa, or the Middle East – all agree that the acts committed by Stalin’s Soviet Union was a form of genocide against the Ukrainian people.

In May 2009 the “Security Service” of Ukraine created a criminal case “in relation to the genocide in Ukraine in 1932–33″, and on 13 January 2010 the court found Joseph Stalin and other Communist leaders guilty of genocide against the Ukrainians. However, as all of the accused had died years before, the court could not press criminal proceedings against them.

In 1953, Dr. Raphael Lemkin, who we today get the legal definition of genocide from said “the destruction of the Ukrainian nation [referring to 1932-33]” is the “classic example of genocide . . . This is not simply a case of mass murder. It is a case of genocide, of the destruction, not of individuals only, but of a culture and a nation.”

Hopefully in the not too distant future, today’s genocide of White people by forced assimilation will be internationally recognized. Already we have a great deal of proof from what anti-Whites have said and done.4e1bbcd2-2084-9d7f

Marin county, California for example, was deemed “too White” by the Obama regime, and as a result the government put policies in place encouraging more non-White immigration.

General Wesley Clark said that “there is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states” – according to General Clark, a European country that is “too White”, would need to be “diversified” (made non-White).

When Raphael Lemkin was drafting the conventions for genocide, he specifically stated that genocide of a group was not necessarily murder or mass murder; it could be policies enforced by a government, for example importing one group of people and trying to “mix” the two groups.

Majority White countries are all forced to become non-White. There can never be a vote over immigration, because moving millions of non-Whites into White countries is the first stage of White genocide.

The second stage of genocide is “assimilation” or trying to mix White people with non-Whites. Not necessarily forcing White people to have children with non-Whites, but deliberately flooding White areas with non-Whites so that “assimilation” seems natural.

Of course none of this is natural, but actually a result of decades of government policies.


Flyers against White Genocide are “White Supremacist”?

Eastern Kentucky University has complained about the freedom of speech of the people or person who put some flyers up concerning the genocide of White people.

In the flyer it is said that there is a “non-violent genocide against White people”, drawing similarities between White genocide by forced non-White assimilation and Tibetan genocide by forced Chinese assimilation.

University spokesman Marc Whitt said that the flyers were posted in classroom buildings that are used to train police and firefighter trainees.

Although no crime has been committed, Whitt says the university is launching an investigation to determine who posted them.

He said “At this point, no one has information leading to any suspects, so it would be premature for us to guess as to who or which group was responsible”.

Although there was nothing negative said about any non-White group in the flyers, a Black female professor says she thinks she was the target of the flyers, leading her to complain of harassment to the university officials.

Whitt went on to say “This is the first reported case of its kind in many, many years . . . So, we are taking a very proactive stance with this.  EKU does not condone language that diminishes anyone or any group,” said Whitt.

If the leaders of the university cannot tell the difference between something neutral and something negative, just what are they teaching the students? It seems to them that if you don’t say something positive of non-White people every time you talk about race – you therefore must hate and oppose them.hatephoto_0

In addition to the “investigation”, Whitt says that EKU will pay for and host a series of trainings and forums for the students, faculty, and staff. It is unclear whether these “trainings” will be mandatory or compulsory.

“Eastern Kentucky University works very hard as a public university to maintain an academic community that confirms one of our country’s greatest freedoms, that being the Freedom of Expression, while at the same time fostering a campus climate that’s open, inclusive, respectful and welcoming,”

Source from


UK Teacher demands Muslim assimilation — of White kids.

Lynn Small, the headteacher (principal) of Littleton Green Community School in Staffordshire, gave parents of the children attending the school two options: 1: Pay £5 (about $10) to send your children to a workshop on Islam, or 2: Have the permanent school records of their children branded with the hate-phrase “racial discrimination”.

Parents were warned that ‘Refusal to allow your child to attend will result in a Racial Discrimination note being attached to your child’s education record, which will remain on this file throughout their school career.

South Staffordshire MP Gavin Williamson said the threat was “a very heavy-handed approach”, going on to say that “the idea of attaching a “racial discrimination note” to children’s education records saying it will remain on their file for the duration for their school career seems unfair, particularly when it is not the child’s decision whether or not he or she attends.”

Parents the threat to the pupils aged between 8 and 11 was “ludicrous”. One woman said: ‘How dare they threaten to brand the children racist at such a young age? It’s going to make them feel like little criminals.

Another parent said: ‘I feel my child will be racist if I don’t allow her to go. This is my choice, not hers, and she shouldn’t have to pay for it.’

The letter sent Wednesday 20th of November said the visit is part of the National Curriculum for religious education and reflects “the multi-cultural community in which we live”.

“It is a statutory requirement for primary school children to experience and learn about different cultures.

“The workshop will give your child the opportunity to explore other religions.”

The letter also said “All absences on this day will be investigated for their credibility and will only be sanctioned with a GP sick note.”1

A revised letter sent out the day after apologised for “inaccuracies” and told parents to “disregard a section from the earlier letter.”

Headteacher (Prinicipal) Lynn Small said “We are a mainly Christian school, but we have to cover at least one other religion as part of the National Curriculum. This visit is part of that.”

“We have pupils and teachers who belong to the Islam faith and it is right for the children to understand and appreciate their faith as well as their own.”