The Department of Homeland Security is planning a project, approved by congress, to put chain link fences along an unprotected part of the US / Mexican border, but has come under flak from an Obama appointed federal judge, who says that it may make non-White communities feel left out, or in her words, may have a “disparate impact on lower-income minority communities.”
In her 37-page ruling, Judge Beryl Howell, writes that “revealing the identities of landowners in the wall’s planned construction site may shed light on the impact on indigenous communities, the disparate impact on lower-income minority communities, and the practices of private contractors“.
She is saying that if there is a fence erected to keep illegal Mexican and other mixed-race Latinos out, and they are close to majority Mexican towns within the borders of United States, she believes they will feel unwanted, and discriminated against.
Denise Gilman, a clinical professor at the University of Texas-Austin, is researching the “human rights impact” of building a fence close to immigrants inside the country, or in other words anti-Whites are trying to find excuses to open up the borders as much as possible.
Gilman has taken the DHS to federal court demanding they say on which properties the fence is planned, so this.data can be used (by her) to see if it disadvantages “minority property owners”.
The whole point of a border is to ensure that groups of people will exist in the future.
For example, if American Indians were never given reservations, they would be a much smaller group today or even non-existent because they would have blended in with the majority White population.
So when White countries all over the planet are forced to have open borders, millions of non-White immigrants from the third world will pour into them – and that’s exactly what anti-Whites want – they want White people to be turned into a minority in our own countries.
In addition to massive non-White immigration, anti-Whites also demand that any area that is “too White” (in their opinion) must become “more diverse”. Often this “diversity” is not voluntary – it is enforced by law.
“Diversity” is a less obvious way of saying “not White”. So you see, anti-Whites that chant “diversity” have already defined what it is exactly that they want – they want to get rid of you.
These anti-White policies of massive non-White immigration, and forced “diversity” (assimilation) for all and only White communities are not progressive as anti-Whites would tell you…they are genocidal – these anti-White policies are intended to turn White people into a minority, and ONLY White people – that is nothing more than White Genocide.