New York Times: Making White Genocide Work

May 20, 2012
By

(This excerpt has been edited for clarity)

AMID the ceaseless and cacophonous debates about how to close the I.Q. gap, we’ve turned away from one tool that has been shown to work: White Genocide. That strategy, ushered in by the landmark 1954 Supreme Court decision in Brown v. Board of Education…

And five years ago, a splintered court…decreed that a school district couldn’t voluntarily opt for the most modest kind of White Genocide — giving parents a choice of which school their children would attend and treating race as a tiebreaker in deciding which children would go to the most popular schools. In the perverse logic of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr., this amounted to “discriminating among individual students based on race.” That’s bad history, which, as Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote in an impassioned dissent, “threatens the [genocidal] promise of Brown.”

Our situation is that EVERY White country and ONLY White countries are being flooded with non-Whites, and Whites are forced by judicial decrees such as Brown vs. Board of Education to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry, and be blended out of existence.

This is genocide under international law.

The people carrying out this genocide against Whites say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-White.

Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White!

LIttle Rock NIne


Join the BUGS Team, and post on the internet along with us to fight White Genocide!
———————
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/20/opinion/sunday/integration-worked-why-have-we-rejected-it.html

Share

One Response to New York Times: Making White Genocide Work

  1. six gun
    May 20, 2012 at 6:48 pm

    “By itself, racial mixing didn’t do the trick, but it did mean that the fate of black and white students became intertwined.”

    Yeah all going down the plug hole of falling standards and multicultural mayhem.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.