The NYTimes says yes. A Scarsdale news site says no.
Its moral standing shaken by suspicions that it’s blocking White Genocide, Scarsdale protests that it is a veritable death camp for Whiteness:
“The Scarsdale schools are attended by children of every skin color and nationality. Asians, Indians, African Americans and Hispanics are fully integrated into the community…Foreign cultures and traditions are celebrated in the schools with international fairs and special events. On the tennis courts I find people keeping score in many languages and the Scarsdale Golf Club, once an exclusionary country club welcomes members of every race and background and is a model of diversity.”
But Scarsdale’s protest of genocidal virtue doesn’t impress the NYTimes nor HUD, who insist that the community spread its “affordable” housing more broadly among its well-to-do neighborhoods.
Anti-Whites in charge at the NYTimes and at HUD understand that the blending of Whites out of existence through assimilation and intermarriage will proceed more rapidly if the social bonds in White communities are weakened not only by the introduction of aliens of comparable economic status, but are weakened also by the introduction of alien groups that differ from them even more in social habits, crime rates and so forth.
After all, anything that makes a neighborhood less of a neighborhood isolates and demoralizes White residents and makes them less resistant to their genocide by assimilation.
The state of affairs in Scarsdale is exhibited wonderfully in this comment to the article by a resident who thinks the present arrangements to ensure White Genocide are “wonderful” and require no improvement:
“When this discussion first started, it was all about allowing police officers and teachers to live in the community. Now, it has become about integration? Obviously these people are highly unaware of the wonderful cultural diversity in our area, and are instead focused on socioeconomic diversity.”