Fox News, long known as the respectable conservative answer to liberal network television, wants the Republican candidates to support citizenship for millions of non-White illegal aliens currently living illegally throughout America. Fox warns that non-White Latinos will not vote for the Republican candidate in the upcoming election unless they become more “moderate” on immigration and support amnesty for illegal non-White aliens. The article did not once mention how opposing such acts may benefit White Americans.
Non-Whites voted overwhelmingly for Obama in 2008 and are expected to vote in the same overwhelming percentages again in 2012.
Six gun, it is OUR race or MY race or WE, not “White people”. Make it personal.
View CommentEverybody does say there’s a race problem, and everybody says the race problem is really the WHITE problem.
If you haven’t heard everybody saying that, you haven’t been listening closely enough!
View CommentI understand the Mantra so much better after this thread. I really do. I just read the Mantra over, and for the first time it flowed for me as clear and bright as a mountain stream. As I was reading it this time, I had the thought, “This is the way it sounds to Bob.”
View CommentI’m noticing some of the usernames here. Was this a country music blog that got off topic and changed its name? lol.
View CommentNo! We were just trying to keep woodpile away. But it didn’t work!
View CommentHo ho, SS. I went to the BUGS site and checked out what you guys are doing. You’re a clever bunch for sure. You have an answer for everything. But that’s easy since your answer is always white genocide!
But I agree with you on the immigration issue. I’ll check you out now and then and when I’ve seen a little more I’ll come up with some things you won’t be able to answer. Until then, stay cool you white devils! Ha ha!
View Comment“I’ll come up with some things you won’t be able to answer.”
Won’t do you any good, woodpile. When that happens out in the mainstream we just ignore you and keep on imposing our pro-White terminology on the anti-Whites and making our pro-White points about White GeNOcide.
We also take the question back to our hive and work it over until we DO have an answer. There’s always an answer, because White GeNOcide is a fact just like anti-Whites are a fact.
woodpile, I believe if you were white you’d be spreading the Mantra already.
White GeNOcide!
View CommentAnti-racist is a code word for anti-White
HD, you also wrote:
“If the different varieties of white-tailed deer that evolved in the environmentally different valleys of the Great Smoky Mountains were removed from their separate valleys and mixed together in a single area, then in a few generations there would be only one blended “variety” of white-tailed deer.”
That’s as good an explanation as I’ve seen of how flooding White countries with non-Whites and forcing Whites to assimilate with them is White Genocide.
View CommentHD writes above:
“…anti-White TV sells constantly the falsehood that black men are strong, capable, intelligent husband-material that White women desire.”
And responsible, HD. On TV, black men are responsible. Responsible like good husbands and fathers should be.
The anti-White program of White Genocide involves a lot of false advertising.
Sorry, woodpile. Nothing personal! Lol! 🙂
View CommentWhew! You bunch of white devils are a trip! Lol! Something that takes so much effort to understand is a sharp-edged weapon in combat? ‘Dis ole darky don’ unerstand how de young massas don’ gets der asses whupped usin’ der Mantra! Lol! Ha ha!
View Comment“Something that takes so much effort to understand is a sharp-edged weapon in combat?”
That’s part of the mystery of the Mantra, woodpile!
Check out how we use it successfully in practice here:
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/topic/where-did-you-post-the-mantra-today-ii/page/58/
If you like what you see, join in and become the first Black bugster! Lol and ha ha!
You’re a bit of a trip yourself. But you’re obviously intelligent and may be educable. Do you realize that White civilization (a redundancy) has invented ALL of the devices that fill your life…telephone, computer, radio, television, car, airplane, de’ steam drill dat beat John Henry, ALL the wonderful musical instruments that your people have made such wonderful music with (and I thank you for that), the ability to record music, and….do you realize that the idea of personal freedom itself comes out of White civilization? And that the first time in history that the universal practice of slavery was outlawed anywhere by anyone was when White civilization outlawed it in the 1800s? That if not for White civilization there’s a good chance you would be dead of some disease by now?
In other words, do you understand that contrary to the propaganda of the anti-Whites who want White Genocide, your people and all other peoples will be much worse off if the anti-White program of White Genocide succeeds?
There’s no reason at all that you shouldn’t, and every reason that you should, join us in fighting anti-Whites and opposing White Genocide! Check it out, woodpile!
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White!
View Comment“…White civilization (a redundancy) has invented ALL of the devices that fill your life…telephone, computer, radio, television, car, airplane, de’ steam drill dat beat John Henry,..”
Take note, view_from_the_woodpile! Man does not live by peanut butter alone! Lol!
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White!
View CommentNuclear physics takes some effort to understand too, but it’s produced some powerful weaponry. Same with the Mantra.
View CommentFor those of us who swear by the Mantra, it wasn’t love at first sight for most of us. It took us awhile to understand it, and a while also to appreciate both its precision and flexibility. (For those who don’t know, its author, Bob Whitaker, is a genius who entered college at age 16 and was a professional psychological warrior for the U.S government and contributed to bringing down the Berlin Wall. He developed and tested the Mantra “in combat” over a period of years).
The Mantra is written for the long haul, not for the quick fix. It takes a little work to become comfortable with it!
White GeNOcide!
View CommentAnti-racist is a code word for anti-White!
Okay, thumb-nail summary and exegesis of the Mantra (the Mantra is copied in full above, January 18, 2012 at 3:01 pm):
The “race problem” Bob Whitaker refers to in his Mantra turns out to be Whiteness. The antidote to the race problem is non-Whiteness.
Non-Whiteness is accomplished principally by the genocidal measure of flooding White countries with non-Whites and forcing Whites to assimilate with them.
View CommentThe liberal Young Turks finally turned decisively against Ron Paul and gave their loyalty back to Obama, even though they feel betrayed by Obama on issues that Ron Paul agrees with them on: stopping the wars, investigating the banks, and protecting civil liberties. What clinched their decision was “racist” newsletters sent out under Paul’s name years ago which Paul didn’t write and which he’s repudiated.
Here’s a comment on the Derek Black Show about that by Truck Roy, a very bright “Mantrista.”
“You know, that’s interesting, because the idea they have there is that Ron Paul, because of some things in his newsletter, MAY be racist, and so the antidote to being racist is to be black [or “non-White,” as Roy said later].
“Because black people can’t be racist, you know. Obama, and the things he said, and the things his minister said, and the things his wife said, those things can’t be racist because Obama’s black. And so to get rid of racism you have to go with the non-white.
“And that’s the whole…you’ll see this everywhere you go. The solution to racism is to flood White countries with hundreds of millions of non-whites. You never see the solution to racism in Africa, or the lack of diversity in Asia is to flood Asian nations with hundreds of millions of non-Asians, or flood African nations with hundreds of millions of non-Africans.
“This is why we say anti-racist is a code word for anti-White. ONLY White people can be racist and ALL White people are racist.”
Here’s my own summary of Roy’s comment:
The “race problem” Bob Whitaker refers to in his Mantra turns out to be Whiteness. And the antidote to the race problem is, as Bob’s Mantra says, non-Whiteness.
View CommentI like that more general identification of the “race problem” than was given in the summations above. But let’s make your “antidote” a little more specific to the Mantra:
The “race problem” Bob Whitaker refers to in his Mantra turns out to be Whiteness. The antidote to the race problem is non-Whiteness. Non-Whiteness is accomplished principally by the genocidal measure of flooding White countries with non-Whites and forcing Whites to assimilate with them.
View CommentThe anti-White laws that enforce assimilation are critical to speeding up the process of White Genocide.
If the different varieties of white-tailed deer that evolved in the environmentally different valleys of the Great Smoky Mountains were removed from their separate valleys and mixed together in a single area, then in a few generations there would be only one blended “variety” of white-tailed deer.
This is why mixing has been such an important part of the anti-Whites’ program of White Genocide.
View CommentThe fact that the law requires you to go to school with non-Whites, to live in neighborhoods with non-Whites, and to work with non-Whites, doesn’t mean you have to have babies with non-Whites! That’s a personal choice! Humans are not deer!
View CommentAdvertisers learned long ago that “choice” is highly manipulable. Whites or anyone can be sold ANYthing, and anti-White TV sells constantly the falsehood that black men are strong, capable, intelligent husband-material that White women desire.
Think how many anti-White commercials you’ve seen that pair a blonde White woman with a black man who is helping her choose the right product…him!
Media and current social morality press toward breaking down any remaining barriers to interracial marriage. Young black men constantly call young white women the r-word if they won’t go out with them, won’t sleep with them, and shame many of them into acts that they never would have considered in a less anti-White era.
From all directions, young White women are pressed to mate with Blacks.
And it’s working.*
*”Black-White Kids Surge in South Where Mixed Unions Once Banned”
View Commenthttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-30/black-white-kids-surge-in-south-where-mixed-unions-once-banned.html
I am so glad my daughters a true pro-White.
View Commenthow_high_is_the_water_Mama writes:
I would agree that “everybody” (using the word in the colloquial sense of “accepted opinion,” or in the case of racial topics, “everybody who holds an opinion that they’re allowed to express publicly”) believes that “the race problem” is largely “racism,” or more specifically, “White racism.”
Before we even get to that: even in the colloquial sense of “everybody,” I don’t think the first line of your Mantra tells the truth when it says that everybody says there’s a race problem.
View CommentIf you ask everyone you meet today if they think there’s a race problem, you don’t think the overwhelming majority of them will say, “Yes”?
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
View CommentHere’s the Mantra we’re talking about. It’s found presently at “About Anti-Whites” under the tab above, “About White GeNOcide Project,” or here:
http://www.whitakeronline.org/blog/the-white-mantra/
The Mantra
Everybody says there is this RACE problem. Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
The Netherlands and Belgium are just as crowded as Japan or Taiwan, but nobody says Japan or Taiwan will solve this RACE problem by bringing in millions of third worlders and quote assimilating unquote with them.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to “assimilate,” i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.
What if I said there was this RACE problem and this RACE problem would be solved only if hundreds of millions of non-blacks were brought into EVERY black country and ONLY into black countries?
How long would it take anyone to realize I’m not talking about a RACE problem. I am talking about the final solution to the BLACK problem?
And how long would it take any sane black man to notice this and what kind of psycho black man wouldn’t object to this?
But if I tell that obvious truth about the ongoing program of genocide against my race, the white race, Liberals and respectable conservatives agree that I am a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
View CommentOr with slightly less clutter,
“The race problem” is the evil desire of White people to live with their own kind, and the effective remedy of flooding White countries with non-Whites (for whatever purpose) and forcing Whites to assimilate with them by its very nature commits genocide against Whites.
View CommentInserting “(for whatever purpose)” was an improvement over my statement. So often anti-Whites say we’re full of malarky since we aren’t being flooded with non-Whites because anyone wants to genocide us, but because Republicans want cheap labor for businesses, Democrats want new Democratic voters, and so on.
Well some of the impetus behind the flooding (and even more so the forced assimilation) IS an intention to genocide us, and as for the others, I don’t care what their purposes are in genociding us, or even if they haven’t thought through the consequences of their actions…that’s true of a lot of other criminals as well! They know they’re committing acts that work to the disadvantage of Whites, and those acts are acts of genocide.
View Comment“SparklingBrownEyes,” do you live “in a ramshackle shack in ole’ Caroline”?
Who’s going to sing the good old country songs once we’ve been blended out of existence and there’s no more white babies?
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White!
View CommentIn English law “intent” is generally seen as you meant to do something, that that was your purpose.
When something is “reckless,” you foresaw the event but that was not your purpose.
Sometimes the inevitability of something is so obvious, so certain, that the accused cannot claim recklessness.
R v Nedrick (1986) 83 Cr. App. R. 267
When an event, even if not actually wanted, was virtually certain, then the accused has intent.
So if a country were being flooded for votes or cheap labour but the virtually certain destruction or partial destruction of a race in that country will occur because of this. Then the destruction is deemed to have been intended.
These traitors will be guilty, if there is anyone left to try them.
View CommentYour post sent me on an interesting few minutes of reading about the definition of “intent” in law. Apparently in the U.S. it varies somewhat state to state, and in some cases depends on what a “reasonable” person would foresee.
Well a reasonable person would foresee that mixing together any several subspecies, human or otherwise, would result in those subspecies blending together until each subspecies no longer exists to anywhere near the extent it did before (as has happened in Mexico in the last several hundred years…the modern Mexican is typically a person of mixed race).
But to aid carrying out White Genocide, anti-Whites have largely erased reason from among us.
Anti-Whites have taught so many to deny the obvious fact that anti-Whites are carrying out White Genocide, and to even deny the obvious fact that anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
View CommentThe UN Convention on genocide says that acts are genocide if there is INTENT to destroy in whole or in part a racial, religious, etc. group.
So “flooding White countries with non-Whites (FOR WHATEVER PURPOSE)” isn’t genocide under the UN Convention if the purpose isn’t to destroy in whole or in part the White race.
View CommentAs SparklngBrownEyes said just above, “some of the impetus behind the flooding (and even more so the forced assimilation) IS an intention to genocide us.”
And it’s more than just “some.” If you want to regard the comments on the White race by many anti-Whites such as Susan Sontag and Noel Ignatiev as just so many aberrations, go ahead, but they represent a strong feeling of many of the people who set in motion the programs for our extinction.
View CommentOkay, I’ll grant you Noel Ignatiev, but Susan Sontag just calls the White race a cancer. Calling a race a cancer isn’t the same thing as calling for its extinction.
View CommentYour view of cancer differs from the ordinary view.
View CommentSusan Sontag had breast and uterine cancer.
She died of cancer.
The irony overwhelms me.
View CommentThere is a God and He is White.
In addition to the anti-Whites who outrightly desire our total extinction, there are other anti-Whites who claim they desire only to reduce our numbers and our power.
But the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article II states:
“In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.”
The anti-Whites who wish to destroy us only “in part” are also committing genocide.
View CommentAnd the anti-Whites who claim White countries are being flooded with millions of non-Whites only for their cheap labor, or eventually for their votes, are like a man who defends himself against a murder charge by saying that he only wanted the victim’s wallet and murdering the victim to get it was only incidental.
View Comment“…the “race problem” as the Supreme Court decision in the Brown case in 1954 saw it, and as subsequent pieces of legislation viewed it, was specifically Whites living in segregation from Blacks and having some institutions such as schools that Blacks were not admitted to…[so] flooding White countries with non-Whites and forcing assimilation of Whites with non-Whites certainly solves “the race problem”…”
Okay! This interpretation of “the race problem,” or elucidation of one important feature of it, makes the two lines of the Mantra that When_Whites_were_safe quoted in bold clearer to me.
“The race problem” is the evil desire of White people to live with their own kind, and the effective remedy of flooding White countries with non-Whites and forcing assimilation with them by its very nature commits genocide against Whites.
View CommentYou’ve written an excellent one-sentence summary and exegesis of the Mantra! Bravo! I’ll tweak it just slightly:
“The race problem” is the evil desire of White people to live with their own kind, and the effective remedy for that, flooding White countries with non-Whites (for whatever purpose) and forcing Whites to assimilate with them, by its very nature commits genocide against Whites.
View CommentWhites wanting to live with their own kind is not the problem
The problem is White people and the solution is when they are all gone.
That Whites wish to live with their own kind is an obstacle to their annihilation without a shot being fired.
The problem is White people and not what they want to do.
View CommentSome may fight their destruction whilst other assist but the problem remains the same, the problem of the White race.
It is not even Whiteness that is the problem. Race is more than skin colour. The intrinsic abilities and resourcefulness of the White races poses a threat and we must be gone so that the slave race can take our place.
I agree with you, and very well said!! (My post above was made when my understanding was less than it is today)
View CommentHi Harumphty Dumpty – you got me on this thread and we are all are learning together.
It’s just great.
Anti-racist is a code word for Anti-White
And do let anyone tell you any different.
View Comment“…the “race problem” as the Supreme Court decision in the Brown case in 1954 saw it, and as subsequent pieces of legislation viewed it, was specifically Whites living in segregation from Blacks and having some institutions such as schools that Blacks were not admitted to”
That’s not true at all! The “race problem” the Brown decision addressed was that Blacks hadn’t been given equal educational opportunities. That was the problem that integrating the schools was intended to solve.
View CommentBefore the Brown decision, the dictate of the Supreme Court had been that public schools could be “separate but equal.”
Now consider all the money that courts have required school systems to spend on busing and other programs to achieve integration. Couldn’t the courts just as easily have required school districts to spend that money to make the schools truly equal?
And instead of the courts putting so much judicial energy into overseeing and micro-managing busing and redistricting plans to achieve integration, couldn’t the courts have put that energy into micro-managing school districts’ plans to make the schools truly equal?
If you research the Brown decision a little bit, and look into the actors involved and the statements that some of them made about what their motivations were, the fog will lift.
View CommentAnti-Whites always choose the White Genocide option.
They say they’re anti-racist, but what they are is anti-White.
Anti-racist is just a code word for anti-White!
View CommentWe see the statistics time and again.
Despite tons of money being poured in, the black pupils under perform the Whites.
Being forced to study in school with under performing pupils does not help the White children.
The ruling in Brown is portrayed as part of anti-racism.
What it is is anti-White.
Anti-racism is a code word for anti-White.
Brown is just another example.
View Comment“Despite tons of money being poured in, the black pupils under perform the Whites.”
If the charade of trying to close the achievement gap were not kept up, it would be an admission of the inherent inequality of ability between blacks and whites.
So the charade must be maintained, since the falsehood of inherent equal ability of races makes Whites more accepting of the flooding of their countries with non-White races and being forced by law to integrate with those non-Whites to be assimilated and intermarry and be blended out of existence.
The myth of the equality and interchangeability of races is one of the cornerstones of White Genocide.
View CommentSo the eternal efforts to close the achievement gap have nothing to do at all with closing the achievement gap, but have everything to do with the anti-Whites’ program of White Genocide.
That’s true of EVERY anti-White measure, if one examines them in turn…they function chiefly to aid White Genocide.
View CommentAm I correct in believing that the reason we haven’t had an amnesty bill passed in quite a few years is that a great number of Whites are opposed to it and flooded their Congressmen and Senators with protests when Congress edged too close to passing such a bill?
If so, that’s an important reminder that in that single area, the flooding of our country with non-Whites, Whites have stepped outside The Church of PC and have exerted power in their own interest.
Whites understand at a visceral level what Bob Whitaker understands at so many levels: the flooding of White countries with non-whites is White Genocide.
View CommentThese two lines from the Mantra, taken together, explain White Genocide to anyone who will put their thinking cap on:
“Everybody says this RACE problem will be solved when the third world pours into EVERY white country and ONLY into white countries.
Everybody says the final solution to this RACE problem is for EVERY white country and ONLY white countries to ‘assimilate,’ i.e., intermarry, with all those non-whites.”
View CommentI don’t think “Everybody” says that. As a matter of fact, I don’t think I’ve heard ANYbody say that!
View CommentThere’s a lot of ways to make clear that that’s what anti-Whites in effect are saying, but let me offer just one.
Any White who objects to his country being flooded with non-Whites is labeled with the r-word, and anyone who is an r-word is definitely considered to have a race problem, and in fact is considered to BE a race problem. In fact, people who have been labeled as r-words are considered to be the ONLY race problem!
The anti-Whites’ solution to that “race problem” is that all those horrible r-word people learn to accept and welcome the flooding of their countries with non-Whites and offer no objection to mixing with them in their schools, neighborhoods, workplaces, etc., and certainly offer no objection to Whites intermarrying with the non-Whites.
In other words, that Whites accept and welcome White Genocide.
View CommentWhew, that’s some impressive logical gymnastics there!
I would agree that “everybody” (using the word in the colloquial sense of “accepted opinion,” or in the case of racial topics, “everybody who holds an opinion that they’re allowed to express publicly”) believes that “the race problem” is largely “racism,” or more specifically, “White racism.”
But the “race problem” as the Supreme Court decision in the Brown case in 1954 saw it, and as subsequent pieces of legislation viewed it, was specifically Whites living in segregation from Blacks and having some institutions such as schools that Blacks were not admitted to.
It was decreed that the solution to that race problem was forced integration of blacks and whites, and it didn’t much matter whether Whites “accepted and welcomed” it or not.
If the race problem is seen as Whites living in segregation from non-Whites, then flooding White countries with non-Whites and forcing assimilation of Whites with non-Whites certainly solves “the race problem” much more effectively than just the Brown decisions and “civil rights” legislation did.
But of course anti-Whites aren’t really interested in solving “the race problem.” The are interested in solving “the White problem,” by carrying out a program of genocide by assimilation against the White race.
View CommentOur experienced BUGSer dungeoneer just happened to offer these excellent suggestions over on the BUGS site today to any BUGser who encounters Anne’s statement:
Once you get used to using the mantra you’ll have no problem chewing up the anti-whites if they try that line.
E.g: “So you`ve never heard a so-called “anti-racist” demand more mass immigration just for white countries?”
“You`ve never heard a so-called “anti-racist” demand that whites should blend ourselves out of existence with non-whites?”
“You`ve never heard a so-called “anti-racist” demand censorship/worse for white people who oppose mass immigration and “assimilation”?”
“You`ve never heard a so-called “anti-racist” condemn white people as a group for things that happened centuries ago and all the bad things happening in the world today?”
View CommentI’m hoping for a Marcos Garvey to arise among the Hispanics and lead them all back to their homelands. I think my hope is as realistic as hoping that either one of our two Anti-White parties that dominate our politics will ever take any such action. But I’d like to be surprised.
View CommentWhat does your screen name signify?
View CommentProbably a lack of fish oils in my diet. It’s a sentence I saw in a restaurant review.
View Comment“Marcos” Garvey? Lol!
View Comment