Flyers against White Genocide are “White Supremacist”?

Eastern Kentucky University has complained about the freedom of speech of the people or person who put some flyers up concerning the genocide of White people.

In the flyer it is said that there is a “non-violent genocide against White people”, drawing similarities between White genocide by forced non-White assimilation and Tibetan genocide by forced Chinese assimilation.

University spokesman Marc Whitt said that the flyers were posted in classroom buildings that are used to train police and firefighter trainees.

Although no crime has been committed, Whitt says the university is launching an investigation to determine who posted them.

He said “At this point, no one has information leading to any suspects, so it would be premature for us to guess as to who or which group was responsible”.

Although there was nothing negative said about any non-White group in the flyers, a Black female professor says she thinks she was the target of the flyers, leading her to complain of harassment to the university officials.

Whitt went on to say “This is the first reported case of its kind in many, many years . . . So, we are taking a very proactive stance with this.  EKU does not condone language that diminishes anyone or any group,” said Whitt.

If the leaders of the university cannot tell the difference between something neutral and something negative, just what are they teaching the students? It seems to them that if you don’t say something positive of non-White people every time you talk about race – you therefore must hate and oppose them.hatephoto_0

In addition to the “investigation”, Whitt says that EKU will pay for and host a series of trainings and forums for the students, faculty, and staff. It is unclear whether these “trainings” will be mandatory or compulsory.

“Eastern Kentucky University works very hard as a public university to maintain an academic community that confirms one of our country’s greatest freedoms, that being the Freedom of Expression, while at the same time fostering a campus climate that’s open, inclusive, respectful and welcoming,”

Source from


5 comments for “Flyers against White Genocide are “White Supremacist”?

  1. cecilhenry
    November 24, 2013 at 12:44 pm

    So, the question is:

    Are they in favour of White Genocide or just against anyone opposing White Genocide??

    Very simple.

  2. November 24, 2013 at 3:13 pm

    Abstention itself is a form of consent on behalf of EKU to the White Genocide happening. I believe a more informative message should be “inclusive” as in the clear one given by the United Nations on the matter of what genocide is, after all, this is a place of learning.

  3. more of the same
    November 25, 2013 at 8:27 am

    No crime was committed but they’re having an investigation and looking for suspects. Speaking out against White Genocide is a non crime crime, punishable by loss of reputation, career, civil suits or even physical violence and jail time.

  4. Rhonda
    November 25, 2013 at 6:37 pm

    How can ONE professor who
    happens to be black claim they were the target when it clearly states it was placed ALL over campus ?

  5. December 21, 2013 at 10:17 am

    The flyer states war declared against Whites, that are anti-white. NOT, non-whites. EKU could make the case that declaring war is declaring the promotion of use of violent conflict against white anti-whites but the EKU would have to find out what whites are anti-white trying to promote and cause our white genocide and extinction. I don’t think anyone should try to find other people and use methods to censor them because of what they say. On the surface it appears that the EKU” people in charge” want to censor the person or persons that made the flyer and avoid the issue of discussion of our white genocide & extinction, A VERY serious matter that needs discussion in a higher learning school. It is clear the school is going to institute more diversity training- “brainwashing”, to avoid talking about the totally different issue the flyer states which is white GENOCIDE. Conclusion: If this an example of a higher learning school I would not send my son or daughter there. It appears the school wants to censor more than promote complex reasoning abilities without limits.

Something on your mind? Have your say!