We charge ANTI-WHITES with their crime of WHITE GENOCIDE.
We do NOT throw ourselves in noble self-sacrifice upon the sharpened and heavily fortified and sanctified memes and terms that ANTI-WHITES have made HOLY. (That’s tailgating).
As Bob Whitaker says, political correctness is not LIKE a religion, it IS a religion. I’ll add that it’s an “old timey” religion of the kind that existed before the scientific revolution, when what we call the religion of that day was perceived by believers not as a separate category of beliefs, but as just part of the self-evident face of reality that only a dangerous madman or a devil would deny!
It’s hard enough that today we are intrinsic blasphemers of the “old timey” religion of our era no matter HOW we proceed, but for us to also spit right on that religion’s most deeply-felt holies of holies every time its priests or laity trot one out is tactically foolish.
Our aim is not to attack the anti-Whites’ heavily fortified shrines by charging straight at them up the promontories they sit atop, but to occupy and cultivate the surrounding virgin territories of “anti-White” and “White Genocide” until we’ve constructed our own mighty citadels, citadels of truth that draw the energies of Whites back into their natural channels and leave the fortified shrines of anti-Whites to crumble into disuse.
Those anti-white shrines will eventually be royally sacked, and Whites who are fighting directly against those shrines today get no objection from me, but our work is different.
For more on this theme, see this comment below,
and this comment:
Forced Integration is Genocide
Related:
“Anti-white” vs. the R-word
“White Genocide” and the R-word: neither found love at first sight!
If you oppose WHITE GENOCIDE, this is the best 3-minute monthly party in town!
——–
This essay that I posted to a great 18-minute podcast by Beefcake attempts to teach the same lesson as the present article:
Beefcake’s Bootcamp Episode 9: DO NOT TAILGATE
The standard pro-White mode of debate is to respond to the anti-White’s challenges and tailgate the anti-White right into the territory where the anti-White wants to lead him, territory where the anti-White can easily dismiss him as a “Nazi” or “racist” in front of the audience of other Whites that the pro-White wants to win!
Most of that White audience is going to accept your anti-White opponent’s charge that you’re a “Nazi” or a “racist,” if he succeeds in drawing you into attacking his strongest citadels that the anti-Whites have been fortifying for decades: the sanctity of the Holocaust®, the victimhood and innocence of all Jews, and the still brightly shimmering mirage of we-only-differ-from-blacks-because-of-our-different-cultures-and-history.
Anti-Whites already control ALL that territory that they will drag you through if you argue with them about what they WANT you to argue about! If you do battle in that territory, no one will come out of their houses to take your side, because anti-White rule has been supreme there for too long!
And Beefcake explains expertly that not only do we not argue with the Anti-Whites about what they want us to argue about, but we also don’t argue with them about ANYthing!
Instead, we make our OWN points and impose our OWN terminology that states that our opponents are anti-Whites who are carrying out a program of White Genocide!
We put THEM on the defensive!
Every idea that the anti-Whites have leads to a world without White children, and we use their own genocidal utterances to flip them to the mat, hard!
Beefcake explains how to do it.
View CommentExcellent and inspiring article!
View CommentOf course such thinking provokes cries of protest from many traditional pro-Whites:
“You’ve GOT to talk about the thing that’s going to make your audience HATE you, you’ve GOT to, otherwise there’s NO HOPE!”
Lol!
View CommentI thought “tailgating” was getting off the topic of White GeNOcide by following anti-whites into territory they’ve controlled and fortified for half a century.
I guess tailgating is also rushing into that territory before an anti-white you’re engaging has even invited you there.
View CommentWell written. I appreciated the vision outline, here.
View CommentExactly, they own the terminology that is pc.
We can’t redefine it, so we use our own terminology.
Just like an article in sweden said recently about kids in school using the mantra.
“When they debate the teacher, it is not to convince the teacher or win against the teacher, it is to recruit the other students who listen to the debate”
View CommentHiram, are the anti-white memes and terms we avoid so poisonous that you don’t dare mention them? Some readers may be left a bit in the dark.
White GeNOcide!
View CommentAnti-racist is a code word for anti-white!
Nazi, Holocaust, swastika, jew, Hitler are examples of terms that activate a lifetime of anti-white conditioning.
Include those words or others like them in any posting that opposes White Genocide, and readers will see nothing other than those words and will immediately assume that you’re a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
View CommentYou could have just posted this short comment somewhere and skipped the article. 🙂
View CommentYeah, I got lost in all that landscape. “Promontories”? That’s not even a word that’s used on television. How does Hiram expect us to know such words?
“Holy Church of Political Correctness” — I like that though. That’s the religion we all live under.
View Comment“Our Most Holy Church of Political Correctness” is the state religion in all White countries today. Commit blasphemy against it at your peril, heretic!
View Comment@ Survivor
That Church is rapidly weakening though. With any luck, this article and some of the comments will be dated in five years.
View Comment