Councillor Jeffrey Tucker, a member of Havering Council, a district in London has said that merging a “95%” White workforce from Havering Council with a “95%” non-White workforce from the Newham Council is a “terrible idea”.
At a council cabinet meeting Tucker said “I can’t see the two councils being able to work together. It would be like putting two football [soccer] teams together – an African team and an English team – and saying: ‘Get on and work together’.”
Tucker didn’t explicitly say it, but he clearly understands that the majority non-White staff and White staff will not be able to work together.
The majority non-White Newham council staff is responsible for the public sanitation of Newham, and Tucker pointed out that Newham was full of ‘filthy streets’ and ‘unwashed windows’.
He added: “The ethnic change will be too quick for us to absorb and get used to. We need a bit more time.
“It’s going to make it very difficult, awkward and uncomfortable for both sides and I think it’s too soon.”
“You look at the streets and they are filthy. You look at the shops and they aren’t clean like our shops . . . We are putting our well-run council at risk.”
The 2011 census data reports that Havering’s population is 83 per cent white British, while Newham’s population is 17 per cent white British.
The proposed merger of council staff would be just the small picture of forcing White people to live and work with non-Whites, which is forced assimilation; one of the main conditions of White genocide.
Andrew Boff, the London Assembly’s Conservative group leader, was “dumbstruck” by what Tucker said, and demanded he be given some “diversity” training immediately.
Of course, by “diverisity training”, what Boff means is essentially brainwashing and guilt tripping Tucker into accepting White genocide.
Boff said it was “deeply offensive; I can’t understand why in 2013 this councillor seems to think that an attitude that separates people because of race is OK.”
Meanwhile on planet Earth, anti-Whites separate people because of their race every day. The race problem, or as it’s more commonly known the “diversity” problem, is ONLY refering to one race of people, White people.
Boff continued, “Havering is getting more diverse, and he needs to buck up his ideas. His comments must be terribly offensive to people in his ward with African heritage.”
Roger Reid, a citizen of Newham, said “This man [councillor Tucker] needs more than diversity training . . . we are not living in the 19th century, which is where this man belongs.”
Reid believes in the idea of the “mixed race future” (but only in White countries). In fact if you are politically correct you must promote a “mixed race future” (but again, only in White countries).
Tucker later goes on the defensive saying his comments weren’t “about race at all – I just think Havering isn’t ready for the level of diversity already present in Newham – that’s all.”
It’s a pity someone didn’t tell him anti-racist is just a codeword for anti-White – he could have told THEM that and throw the accusation back in their faces! When anti-Whites talk about “diversity”, what they imagine is a whole world without a single White person in it.
When anti-Whites talk about “mixing THE races”, what they imagine is Asian people in Asia, Black people in Africa, Muslim people in the Middle East, Jews in Israel . . . and where White people used to be – these “rainbow nations” of brown skinned, brown haired, brown eyed people.