Danish government is now paying foreigners to go home – good news.

25831079-waving-danish-and-turkish-flags-of-the-political-map-of-the-world
The Danish government has introduced a voluntary repatriation policy. This new law pays foreigners if they are prepared to return to their country of origin.

A foreigner who is willing to leave Denmark might receive 127,517 DKR (Danish Krone) which is about 23,000 US dollars, and they would receive 38,000 DKR for every child of theirs leaving with them.

Foreigners with more money can expect to be paid less, but still a large amount of 50,000 DKR – about 9000 US dollars.

Denmark originally introduced this legislation in January back in 2000, but it has taken to 14 years for it to become law in April this year.

This repatriation law would apply to ‘refugees’, ordinary immigrants, and adult children of immigrants who hold Danish citizenship.

Denmark has 590,000 immigrants – making 10.4% of the total population of Denmark. 390,000 (66%) of immigrants are “non-Western” (non-White) such as Turkish, Iraqi, Jews, and Roma.

The Turkish are especially more likely to take their leave of Denmark, as the Turkish government wants all Turks living in foreign countries to return home and add more labor to its workforce.

Ali Rıza Önay, the Labor and Social Security Consultant for Turkey’s Embassy in Copenhagen, said statistics show that most of the Turks leaving Denmark between 2007 and 2012 were aged 20 to 29 years old, followed by 30 to 39 year-olds, which was unexpected. Önay thought Turks aged 55+ would be more likely to leave than younger Turks, according to dailysabah.com.

Surprisingly, no “anti-racists” are boycotting or threatening Denmark to stop this – as of yet, anyway.

We say anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White because we point out that all these major “anti-racist” campaigns only exist in White countries, and only exist to talk about “how evil” White people are. Then we point out that they are nothing more than anti-White.

No “anti-racists” care if a non-White country wants to remain non-White. For example, just recently in the news President of Zimbabwe, Robert Mugabe saidNo White person will be allowed to own land in Zimbabwe” and “Whites will never come back“, but no “anti-racists” care about this – not one bit.

You see, when they talk about “diversity” – their ultimate goal – what they mean is no White majorities, and so in addition to our previous point, we make that point that “diversity” is a code for White genocide.

It’s White genocide because forced “diversity” on White areas leads to a White minority – by design. Trying to turn a group into a minority is the whole purpose of genocide, and yes massive immigration and forced “diversity” (also known as “forced assimilation”) is as much genocide as bullets or bombs.

Share

12 comments for “Danish government is now paying foreigners to go home – good news.

  1. Australian of the Year
    July 6, 2014 at 6:38 am

    Great to finally hear a good news story. Here is a good news story too called The Never Ending White Genocide. The ending is the good news part. Its an Anti-White’s struggle to come to terms with his self hating actions. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ocBhCDk-in4

    View Comment
  2. Janet
    July 6, 2014 at 10:09 pm

    How is this good news??!! It’s like paying random to a kidnapper. You only invite more kidnapping! Now White genocide pays even more dividends to non-Whites as if all the other goodies weren’t enough. How about this arrangement: we won’t shoot you on sight if you don’t step foot in our countries?

    View Comment
    • July 7, 2014 at 12:23 am

      Yes, that’s just what I was thinking. I’m at a total loss to try and understand how an entire country loses control over who or how many immigrants are allowed to enter it’s boarders. Just exactly what is the element dictating the Dutch government MUST allow undesirable aliens into the country.

      View Comment
    • Kyle
      July 8, 2014 at 9:58 am

      Can’t get there from here. But this is a good start.

      View Comment
  3. Stevie H.
    July 7, 2014 at 10:20 am

    Immigrants to China, Japan and Taiwan get handed temporary working visas from the start. They never get offered permanent residence or citizenship, and they don’t get paid to leave either. “Citizenship” immigration – where immigrants are treated like future citizens as soon as they arrive – only exists in White countries.

    View Comment
  4. July 8, 2014 at 8:19 pm

    Good news? No, that’s great news, and hardly believable when you look at all the bull**** propaganda of today. Of course they can’t force anyone to do anything. Europe is all too ‘civil’ by now. But yeah, I hope other European countries follow that path very soon – it’s past time!

    View Comment
  5. Angus
    July 8, 2014 at 9:58 pm

    1

    How has any European country benefited by opening it’s borders to these people? Do they make Europe a safer place to live? Have they made Europe great? Are they good for tourism? Do they bring anything positive to Europe? Do they respect the citizens of Europe and the customs? Do they support themselves without burdening the tax payers? Do they love Europe or what they can get from her?

    Do they victimize the European people in large proportions to their small numbers? Wouldn’t crimes against the European people foreshadow their true intentions? Do they trash up the areas they inhabit in Europe? If they trash up another peoples land that have given them a new start at life, wouldn’t that be like a direct “screw you”? Do they demand you to change your ways and customs so they can tolerate you? Do they respect the peoples government? Your family? your people?

    If they are guilty of three of these questions then It would be safe to say they should not be in Europe. There is more harm than good for Europe and her people.

    If a European country don’t let the hoards flood their land they are called”racist” and “Nazis” if they let them in, their country will be torn apart. Which one is easier to live with? Which one does the most damage? Which choice is beneficial to the European country? Wake up before it’s too late.

    View Comment
  6. Pingback: Ruch Twórczości
  7. Pingback: Ruch Twórczości
  8. Charlie Martel
    February 7, 2016 at 2:07 pm

    I found the charter below when searching the web for information about organisations advocating the repatriation of non-white immigrants. It sets out the kind of approach I’d like to see the UK government (and other European governments) take on this matter.

    http://ethnicreconstruction.altervista.org/

    ********

    CHARTER FOR ETHNIC RECONSTRUCTION

    Article 1: Repatriation Scheme

    The introduction of a repatriation scheme to reduce the number of non-whites in Britain. The aim of the scheme would be to produce small, well-integrated ethnic minority communities – no more than one million in total – evenly spread in geographical terms across Britain, stable in age profile, spread across different social classes and occupations and reflecting the range of ethnic groups present here.

    Those returning under the scheme would bring enormous benefits in terms of skills and capital to their home countries, which many of these countries so lack. This would aid economic development and thus, in turn, help to reduce migratory pressures.

    Article 2: End to Non-White Immigration

    An end to all but very small-scale non-white immigration. This includes abandoning the present system of asylum, and the strengthening and proper enforcement of existing laws against illegal immigration.

    Article 3: White Immigration Scheme

    The introduction of an immigration scheme to attract people of white European descent living outside Europe to settle in Britain. This programme would be aimed principally at those living in the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and South Africa.

    Article 4: New Citizenship Law

    The introduction of a new citizenship law to limit citizenship to people of British and other white European descent. Existing passports held by non-whites would be valid until their date of expiry, but would not be renewed. Those non-whites remaining on completion of the repatriation scheme would do so as resident non-citizens.

    Article 5: Repeal of Race Relations Legislation

    The repeal of all race relations legislation, along with the abolition of all race relations organisations.

    Article 6: Government Apology

    The making by the government of a public apology for the mass non-white immigration of recent decades, in which they should be joined by leaders of all political parties, the trade unions and other organisations which have supported, or at least failed to oppose, the creation of a multi-racial society in Britain.

    This apology would serve as the official announcement of the death of the destructive ideology of multi-racialism and the beginning of a period of ethnic reconstruction. It would provide a valuable marker to indicate a turning point in British history.

    Article 7: Recognition and Compensation

    Official recognition of, and financial compensation for, those who spoke out against the creation of a multi-racial society in Britain and as a result became the target of government surveillance which, at the very least, seriously affected their ability to lead normal personal and work lives.

    Article 8: Opening of Records

    The opening of the records of the security services relating to those who opposed the creation of the multi-racial society so that these people may check details of the actions of the authorities against them and how the authorities purported to justify their actions.

    Article 9: Prosecution

    The prosecution of those who have been responsible for the mass non-white immigration of recent decades, and for the passing of race relations legislation designed to provide a legal framework for the multi-racial society and suppress dissenting views.

    Article 10: Prevention of Recurrence

    The introduction of legislation to make it a criminal offence to advocate large-scale non-white immigration or the passing of race relations legislation in any form.

    Article 11: Ethnic Reconstruction Commission

    The creation of an Ethnic Reconstruction Commission to coordinate the implementation of the above measures.

    Article 12: European Union

    Support for the replacement of the current European Union with a new European Union which would include all the nations of Europe other than those more properly belonging to the Middle East. Unlike the present EU, this new organisation would not be designed to evolve into a European state. It would not have a single currency and there would be immigration controls between nations.

    Support for the introduction of policies in line with those contained in this charter across the new union, where those policies are relevant.

    View Comment

Write a comment here.