Despite anti-White efforts to make the college of Charleston more non-White in past years, anti-Whites still aren’t happy.
The Black students of the college make up 6% of the total students, which leaders say is far too low for a South Carolinian public college, where Blacks are about 30% of the population.
However in recent years, anti-White policies like non-White scholarships have to failed to succeed, keeping the Black student population fixed at around 6%.
John Bello-Ogunu, who is the college’s chief ‘diversity officer’, said everyone at the college is dedicated to discriminating against White students in order to make the college more non-White, despite other anti-Whites proclaiming that race doesn’t matter.
He said the amount of money used for non-White scholarships was around $125,000; which he says is too small, as providing more Scholarship money often lures non-White students into enrolling.
He also says that in South Carolina, many public colleges and universities compete with each other for qualified non-White applicants, which he says is especially true for black students. “The competition is fierce among state institutions for qualified black applicants. It will take continued, aggressive efforts [to make the college more non-White]“, he said. “We’ll work hard until we are successful.”
Dot Scott, who is president of the Charleston branch of the NAACP, suggests that the college leaders should increasingly discriminate against White students: “I don’t think there’s enough top-down commitment; if the top really wanted it to change, they would give the directive to bring up the numbers. [...] It’s all about recruitment and creating a supportive environment once (minority students) get there.”
Charleston College President George Benson, in a prepared statement said the school’s leadership is committed to replacing White students. “Our goal is to be a diverse and welcoming community, we are looking for real solutions to diversity challenges at the college, rather than quick fixes that won’t last. Our approach to diversity is holistic and has involved changes to our recruitment, mentoring, programming, and financial support for diverse students.”
There you have it folks, when he says “diverse students”, he’s saying there are two groups: non-Whites who are “diverse”, and White people who are not – a typical anti-White line. Why do you think ONLY White areas are accused of being “too White”?
“Simply recruiting underrepresented minority students without a commitment to creating and maintaining an environment that promotes retention is unacceptable,” Benson stated.
They say they are “anti-racist”. They say anything that is “too White” is “racist”. They say that “diversity” solves the problem of being “too White”.
BUT, they never say that anything is “too Black”. They never say that “diversity” solves the problem of being “too Black”.
Who do they think they are fooling? They’re not “anti-racist” – they’re anti-White.
Every single anti-White policy on this planet is merely just an excuse, whether they know it or not, that leads to a world with a shrinking White minority – White genocide.