10 comments for “Beefcake’s Bootcamp Episode 25: The Recruiting Conundrum

  1. Harumphty Dumpty
    January 9, 2013 at 6:58 pm

    Absolutely BRILLIANT job, Beefcake! I don’t expect to ever hear a better description of what it is we’re doing!

    As for recruiting, I think a lot of our frustration over our paltry results as recruiters (paltry in quantity, but definitely not in quality!) is because we STILL are infected by the SAME ILLUSION that makes the pro-Whites who are unresponsive to us continue to write their treatises on IQ, crime stats, racial behavior, etc. that have been ineffective for decades now: the illusion that most human beings (Whites at least) are reasonable creatures who will see the sense of something when it’s put in front of their faces, or at least will see the sense of it when it’s explained to them.

    They will not. The overwhelming majority of humans of any race can understand very little beyond the practical matters of their everyday life, unless it’s spoon-fed them in tiny bites over a long period of time. This is true even for persons of considerably higher than average intelligence, if the matter presented to them for understanding is something very different from anything their minds are accustomed to dealing with.

    I believe you used other words that touched on the fact that most of the “understanding” we humans have is just “conditioning.”

    We at BUGS who try to recruit will function better (suffer less aggravation) if we fully appreciate that fact, and realize that we are aiming for the 1 in 100 or 1 in 1000 pro-Whites who will “get” what we are doing and are motivated, and for the others we are just laying Mantra on them so that in time they will align themselves with it just like the rest of Whites.

    • Harumphty Dumpty
      January 11, 2013 at 11:24 pm

      Well that was verbose. I guess I needed to vent. I’ve been trying to get signatures for Stop White Genocide petitions on SF, and at the moment, pro-Whites are seeming to me about the most inert group of humans I’ve ever encountered.
      http://www.stormfront.org/forum/t938792/

      In the fictional alternate history, “Guns of the South,” by Harry Turtledove, time travelers from today carry automatic weapons back to the South during the time of the Civil War. (There’s a great picture on the cover of the paperback of Robert E. Lee cradling an automatic weapon at the ready!)

      Well if the Southern army had been composed of today’s pro-whites, they would have said to the time travelers, no thank you, those things will never work, we’re happy losing with the weapons we have.

  2. Jason
    January 11, 2013 at 7:13 am

    Great broadcast. I like how you summarized how people deal with a con:

    1. First they deny it
    2. Then they laugh about it
    3. Then they get mad

    We are still dealing with the denial stage but we are making progress!

  3. January 5, 2013 at 9:32 am

    Anon, your comment just shows you didn’t listen to Beefcake’s podcast.

    Forget crime stats – crime state have a long, consistent history of failure. So why would you want to go back to them, unless you want to fail?

    What you are suggesting is tailgating (see Beefcake’s Bootcamp #9 for details), and its a great strategy for losing an argument, and wasting your time.

    Try focusing on White genocide. There are no melting pots in Africa, Asia or Mexico. Melting pots are only for White people and White countries – and that’s genocide.

    If you need some assistance, just ask. But I suggest you listen to Beefcake’s Bootcamp anyhow.

  4. Ryan O'Malley
    January 5, 2013 at 10:35 am

    Everyone knows Blacks commit more crimes than Whites. Nobody is impressed when you bring it up. Very few are aware of the worldwide genocide committed against our race. Which message do you think is more important?

  5. The girl in the blue velvet band
    January 7, 2013 at 1:44 am

    Few Whites care about your crime stats, because your crime stats are “rayciss,” and what Whites care about is not being “rayciss”:

    “Connors speculates that she might have run away in the awkward moments before David Francis attacked her had it not been for the fear that she’d appear racist.”
    http://www.poynter.org/how-tos/newsgathering-storytelling/diversity-at-work/88830/the-messy-truth-of-race-rape-class/

    “The woman told detectives she was worried because the man looked like a thug, but she didn’t want to seem racist.”
    http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=49729
    (link to original news report not available: Bakersfield Police: Attacker threatened baby during Rosedale rape, 17KGET.com, March 30, 2009)

    How many times today has the anti-whites’ main weapon of mass destruction, their deadly and mighty R-word, been heard or seen by Whites and become a little more deeply implanted in White minds?

    In contrast, how many times today have our own weapons of mass anti-white destruction, “anti-white,” “White Genocide,” and “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white,” been heard or seen by Whites and become a little more deeply implanted in White minds?

    Anonymous, are you spreading the message of White Genocide? Are you repeating and repeating our pro-white phrases above until they drive the mighty R-word out of White minds and fill those minds in its place?

  6. Ryan O'Malley
    January 7, 2013 at 7:26 am

    There are more inter-racial marriages because every White nation and ONLY White nations are forced to accept massive non-White immigration and forced to assimilate with non-Whites. Assimilation (ie intermarriage) is going to happen when integration is forced. That is genocide. If your intention is White survival, what is more important: A) Continue to forced integration but tell people that Blacks tend to be more violent than Whites or B) Stop genocidal policies of massive non-White immigration and forced integration?

  7. January 7, 2013 at 5:25 pm

    Anon,

    You know exactly what will happen coz it always happens… the Anti-Whites will say blacks only commit crimes “because of poverty” (or colonialism, or racism, or a thousand other things). And Ryan is right, people DO know – and they’re not impressed when you bring it up because it always ends up with no conclusive winner – you say crime stats, Anti-Whites say “poverty” and nobody ever wins the argument. Anti-Whites win though, because you have had no impact on their Anti-White system – so it continues and the crimes you are so concerened about continue.

    If you want to save White people, you need to start attacking White genocide – which is the root of the problem. Anti-Whites have no justification for only flooding White countries, and only White countries, with mass immigration and forcing them to racially integrate with non-Whites until there are no White people and no White countries left. That’s genocide. And it’s a winning argument because the Anti-White system insists that only White people and White countties must be genocided when, in reality, nothing can justify that.

    Believe me Anon, I used to be just like you – fighting Anti-Whites on all kinds of issues, but rarely if ever having any impact in the real world. Why not try listening to Beefcakes Bootcamp and start fighting against White genocide. We all know your stats are true, but we also know that quoting them will have no effect on the Anti-White system.

    All of us have to focus on what is most important and keep hammering the same, consistent message: We will not tolerate the genocide of our race.

  8. Harumphty Dumpty
    January 17, 2013 at 2:47 am

    “White flight is mostly about crime not about preventing inter-marriage between Whites and non-Whites.”

    Fine, then Whites already know about Black crime.

    “I don’t think you will get very far by telling them crime is not an important issue.”

    This contains the kind of exaggeration, and in this case outright falsehood, that you habitually make that causes disruption.

    You need to read that statement, see that it contains an outright lie on your part (which is that we ever tell anyone that crime is not an important issue), and ask yourself why you need to do that.

    “It would be good to tie everything together…”

    Well yes, it would have been great if Isaac Newton could have also invented quantum mechanics, too.

    We have something created by a genius that works, and you’re carping because he wasn’t enough of a genius to fit in your precious crime statistics in addition?

    If you would get off your sorry butt and engage anti-whites with the Mantra, you would realize the truth of what Bob says, that getting into any other material weakens the Mantra points you’re making.

    You have a constitutional need to find fault, and it distorts your thinking to the point that your intelligence is useless.

Something on your mind? Have your say!