Beefcake’s Bootcamp 27: Is Intermarriage Forced?
Download here: 0027 – Is Intermarriage Forced
Beefcake’s Cliffs:
“Nobody is forcing you to Intermarry”
Option 1: We are forced to share every single part of our lives with non-whites, and not allowed to have any exclusive white communities.
You are well aware that leads to enough intermarriage to destroy our race, and yet you claim it isn’t being forced on us when we call it “Genocide”?
Option 2: Nobody is taking away the right of ALL Blacks in ALL Black countries to have anywhere exclusive to live, forcing them to integrate and share every part of their lives with non-Blacks.
If those conditions were imposed on Blacks would you tell them that the intermarriages it leads to, “isn’t being forced” – when they call it “Genocide”?
Option 3: To an anti-white Interracial marriage is the most holy of all pillars, and the conditions that lead to it are your favorite policies to destroy my race.
You insist that whites must not be allowed to have anything exclusive for our race knowing the conditions imposed on us lead to enough intermarriage to wipe us out.
Option 4: You’re claim that the Interracial Marriages aren’t forced is a Strawman argument.
Our POINT is that Whites are being FORCED to share all our nations with non-Whites, and being forced to integrate in all other part of our lives is what leads to those intermarriages.
Do you agree with such imposed conditions, even though they are calculated to eventually bring about the physical destruction of my race, aka Genocide?
Option 5: cut apart and mix up any of the above or anything else that the rest of the swarm effectively uses.
(sound clips: soundbible.com)
This guy comes right out and says it, in 1997. http://articles.philly.com/1997-05-03/news/25562567_1_black-men-cablinasian-white-women
View CommentNot enough today and too late tomorrow.
Extinction is forever. You don’t want to get to the moment when it becomes too late.
Or do they actually want it? Will they ever be here to say “enough, now it CAN make whites disappear”?
Just my thoughts.
View CommentMaybe just say, “When a cancer begins, it’s small”?
View Comment(Winterblade, a third reply to you from me awaits moderation above because it has a link)
The first two sentences of one of our petitions this month can be expanded, or just used as they are.
But I should add to this suggestion and the one preceding, that a return to Mantra should be made immediately, hopefully before the anti-white even replies. These last two replies are tailgating, I suppose, but still seem okay to me as quick rejoinders, but treat them as small potatoes…let the audience know by your lightness of tone (or however you do it) in these rejoinders that all the anti-white’s objections are so silly that they are easily demolished, and you’re willing to interrupt your flow of what’s important, Mantra, for a moment just to show a bit of congeniality or whatever, by dismissing easily one of his objections…certainly not because the anti-white made a point that any big deal needs to be made over.
Happy swarming! 🙂
(Jul #2 of 4) Allow White Americans to vote “Yes” or “No” on WHITE GENOCIDE!
Whites today are in the stage the Amerindians of Mexico were in shortly after the Spaniards arrived and began interbreeding with them.
In time, Whites will arrive at the stage those Amerindians are in today: nearly interbred out of existence and replaced by a mixed race.
We didn’t vote for our countries to be flooded with non-whites!
We didn’t vote to be forced by law to live with non-whites so that interbreeding will blend us out of existence!
The U.N. designates as genocide:
“Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”
Those who are carrying out White Genocide say they’re anti-racist. What they are is ANTI-WHITE!
ANTI-RACIST IS A CODE WORD FOR ANTI-WHITE!
———
goo.gl/3SY5n
View CommentYou could note that most of us can observe in our own areas the steady increase in mixed unions, mixed children, “white” families we know or know of that are mixed, have mixed cousins, etc.
Followed by simply posting:
Overheard by an office worker on the 90th floor of a 100 story building, from a man falling by her open window after jumping off the roof:
“So far, so good!”
View CommentI’ll leave you three comments that have some ideas in them. Below is a comment I once left in a discussion on diversity…I’ve linked the article in the footnote a few times (there are other articles like it that can be found googling), and it seemed effective.
In the Great Smoky Mountains there are different varieties of white-tailed deer that evolved in the different environmental conditions in the different valleys of the Smokies.
Bring all these varieties of white-tailed deer out of their separated valleys and put them together, and in just a few generations there will be only ONE “variety” of white-tailed deer!
Mixing peoples together in every nation of the world will END diversity!*
But of course peoples aren’t being mixed together in EVERY nation of the world.
No one is demanding that African countries be flooded with non-Africans and that Africans assimilate with them and blend themselves out of existence.
No one is demanding that Asian countries be flooded with non-Asians and that Asians assimilate with them and blend themselves out of existence.
But EVERY White country and ONLY White countries are being flooded with non-whites, and urged to “assimilate” (i.e. intermarry) with them.
If I object to this ongoing program of genocide against my race, I’m a naziwhowantstokillsixmillionjews.
The people pushing this program of White Genocide say they are anti-racist, but what they are of course is anti-White.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
”Black-White Kids Surge in South Where Mixed Unions Once Banned” http://goo.gl/grfE4
View Commenthttp://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-30/black-white-kids-surge-in-south-where-mixed-unions-once-banned.html
The response I can see coming from the non-Whites is “there’s not enough interracial marriage happening to destroy the White race.” How can we prove the interracial marriages are at a high enough rate that they are decreasing our population (yeah I know this is almost the same thing I asked you in private, but, I thought maybe this would generate some discussion or something useful).
-Winterblade
View CommentVery useful material, as per usual Beefcake. Options 1 and 2 are my favorites. Flipping the script (imagining if this were happening to Africans) is always useful. Anti-Whites will never take up that challenge, in my experience.
View CommentJustAWhiteMom shows that she is thinking in Mantra. Great Stuff!
View CommentThanks Beefcake, that was very useful.
Because I’m still a greenhorn I used to say “I have no interest in what individuals choose to do, I’m only interested in White genocide” – but that was weak and what you have here is way better. I also like the way you have listed some options (for a bit of variety).
Had to laugh at JustAWhiteMom’s version above. I can’t wait to use that one!
View CommentIt’s important to remember that immediately after Obama was elected (the first time), Cultural Marxist henchman and former Clinton Secretary of Labor, Robert Reich, was caught crowing that now that they had made their long march through our political institution and gotten a non-White elected as President they only had one institution left to conquer: the family.
Look for forced miscegenation laws in the next decade or so. Of course, like all the other anti-White laws Marxists have gotten passed (“civil rights” and “hate” laws come to mind), this law will be selectively enforced against Whites only.
View CommentRuss, that is pure speculation. Beefcake’s brilliant comment (paraphrased) in this podcast was “anti-Whites don’t need to force intermarriage because they can force the conditions that lead to intermarriage.” Why ponder on what may happen a decade from now when you can deal with the genocide that is happening now?
View CommentGreat discussion, great radio. JustAWhiteMom I like those talking points as well.
Anyone who has been using the Mantra knows Anti-Whites constantly try to squirm out of culpability by saying nobody is holding a gun to anyone’s head and forcing intermarriage.
I like Beefcake’s last one on the radio as well: Anti-Whites who promote White Genocide don’t have to force intermarriage when they force all the conditions that lead to so much of it.
Threw together a youtube vid from clips out of this show:
[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QNKkohJbodA&w=420&h=315%5D
Thanks guys, keep up the great work!
View CommentIf I push you off a cliff, I don’t have to force you to crash into the ground, do I? No! The law of gravity will take care of that for me.
You anti-whites pretend to care about “freedom to choose” whenever you’re not FORCING White people to “integrate” with non-whites in ALL white countries.
Why are playing dumb about White genocide anti-White? Why do you support policies that will lead to a future with no White children anywhere on Earth? Anti-racist is definitely just a code word for anti-white!
View Comment“If I push you off a cliff, I don’t have to force you to crash into the ground, do I? No! The law of gravity will take care of that for me.”
What a gem!
View CommentThe trouble with that is they will then claim that mixing is natural if putting groups together is all it takes to cause it.
View CommentGreat responses JustAWhiteMom. I will be using them!
View CommentThe problem with this argument is that the reply will be, “if people are choosing to mix, there is nothing wrong with that. Who are you to tell people who to love.”
I have had people argue that since people mix when together, they would mix anyway.
The audience sides with them at this point. They tune out anything about force and all they hear is “you should choose who to love”.
View Comment