Diane Abbott, the Labour MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington, tweeted “White people love playing ‘divide & rule’. We should not play their game. #tacticasoldascolonialism.” The anti-White tweet is considered a minor offense in the British political world because Abbott is black and Whites have no representation in Britain.
Respectable conservatives like Paul Goodman, a former Conservative MP, like to complain that if a Conservative White tweeted the same about black, he would be fired. He is correct but he isn’t speaking as a White person, he is speaking as a person who is afraid of being called a racist. He knows that anti-racist is a code word for anti-White. In fact, respectable conservatives would lead the lynch mob if a white MP ever tweeted anything with a hint of anti-black bias. Liberals see the black skin and shrug. Liberals believe that blacks are not capable of being held to White standards. Check out this video, around the 2:50 mark, where Samira Shackle excuses anti-White behavior because black history doesn’t compare to White history. The conservative on the news program doesn’t bat an eye because he knows that so much as a hint of challenging this ridiculous non-White anti-White would end his career.
Liberals and traditional white supremacists have similar views on non-whites and their lack of abilities as compared to whites. They just differ on what to do about it. Supremacists tend to push for separation. Liberals want to sacrifice white genes to improve non-whites. They are sick people.
“Liberals want to sacrifice white genes to improve non-whites.”
White anti-Whites, are the ultimate White Supremacists. They don’t believe non-Whites can make it, without White Paternalism.
A White who sacrifices his own race for the sake of other races often acts on an inner feeling that by virtue of his own superior race, he himself is so superior, so much in actual possession of all that matters, that NOTHING RACIAL can do him real harm!
It sounds crazy and contradictory I know, but I’ve observed it in myself and in other Whites.
I don’t have a problem with Diane Abbot’s comment. I have a problem that anti-Whites have imposed a double standard that muzzles Whites while allowing non-whites free expression. Muzzling Whites makes it easier for anti-Whites to carry out White Genocide by flooding White countries with non-Whites to blend Whites out of existence.
Anti-Whites say they are anti-racist, but what they are is anti-White.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
Good point.
I posted the comment below on these sites:
http://www.politicsweb.co.za/politicsweb/view/politicsweb/en/page72308?oid=274235&sn=Marketingweb+detail&pid=90389
http://frstephensmuts.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/hate-speech-charges-laid-against-racist-reverend/#comment-4926
http://afrikanerjournal.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/anc-centenary-celebrations-in-retrospect/#comment-825
http://www.fordstownerssa.co.za/forums/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=57722&p=1095553#p1095553
It’s the White Genocide program of anti-Whites that’s put South Africa in its present state.
It’s the White Genocide program of anti-Whites that is flooding EVERY White country and ONLY White countries with non-whites, and is demanding that Whites assimilate and blend themselves out of existence.
The people who are carrying out this program of White Genocide call themselves anti-racist. What they are is anti-White.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.
————————–
White GeNOcide Project
whitegenocideproject.com