Eurostat, an organization that collects statistics on Europe, shows us that Sweden takes in a massive amount of 21.3% of all “refugees” in Europe
Overall, 24,015 “refugees” were granted residence in Sweden, making it the country that brought in the most illegal immigrants from Africa and the Middle East.
Germany and France were actually the preferred choice of “refugees”, but fewer were let in to those countries than Sweden.
Anti-Whites say that Africa and the Middle east are such bad places to live because White people colonized them years ago.
If colonialism completely ruined countries like anti-Whites claim, then the Roman empire would have completely destroyed Europe and made everyone back then starve and die of disease.
It is just an excuse to make White people feel guilty, and therefore open our country’s borders to mass non-White immigration.
The only people on Earth who are “obliged” to give handouts and have open borders are White people.
The ruling classes of Western countries have decided that they no longer want the West to be full of White people; they have now decided that the West is the “no man’s land” of races, but Black people still get to keep Africa and Asians still get to keep Asia.
In essence, what they call for is: Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, but White countries for everyone.
Anti-Whites LOVE to ask why our Race matter to us. Their newest tactic in responding to White GeNOcide is to ask us why we aren’t Indifferent to it as well.
So we are at a point of:
1)Mass Immigration into ALL and ONLY White countries
2)Forced Integration of formerly White countries
3) Vilification of all whites who oppose this Genocide by Assimilation
All the While Anti-Whites Insist that there can be NO all White countries, and NO all White areas within the formerly White countries. They always argue from a position that leads to a world without White people.
Then they ask US why we aren’t Indifferent to this.
1)”Why are YOU Indifferent to the destruction of a Unique group of People?”
2) “Why do you see Indifference to Genocide as a virtue?”
3) “Would you also be Indifferent if this was happening to any Race other than the White one?”
Anti-Whites say the oddest things when you poke that big White GeNOcide hole. Weather they say Race doesn’t exit (saying Genocide is Impossible), or that Whites are “too diverse to be a Race” OR Whites are “Too inbred and need mixing”, or claim that “Genocide must be violent” (saying erasing a unique group of people is ok is done peacefully), or the newest one “Immigration has never Genocided anybody”… they love making new contradictions and new holes to attempt filling in the hole your point just made. Just wanted to point it out.
Professor Cecile Wright who helped establish the “Labour Black Network” has been calling for “all-black shortlists” to be put in place, meaning that there would be more Black people put in the UK’s house of parliament when places become available.
“It would seem that over the decades things have not progressed as we would like them to.” Wright said, according to the BBC.
“The selection process currently works against the interests of certain groups. We know it worked against the interests of women – hence the all-women shortlist as a mechanism to improve gender representation.”
“We need a similar mechanism to improve the representation in terms of ethnicity and diversity. Particularly with respect to the African and Caribbean community.”
Shortlists should be introduced as “a temporary measure in the same way in which we have all-women shortlists as a way of correcting the imbalance that currently exists” she said.
Some anti-Whites politicians are upset because the UK parliament has 9 Black MPs (members of parliament) out of a total of 650. They are upset because Black people now make up a larger percentage of the popluation, and for them to have a representative number of MPs, they would need 36 in parliament, the Labour Black Network says.
The “Labour Black Network” also calls for Black political candidates to be given grants to pay for their election campaign.
Anti-Whites say they want representation, but when White people are concerned about the direction our countries are heading in, they don’t want us to be represented – they simply scream names at us like “hater”, “racist”, “bigot” or “xenophobe”.
For example, back in 2011, a poll which found two-thirds of White Britons thought immigration was bad for the UK, was worrying to “anti-racist” campaigners who described it as “extremism”.
The reason for this is because in the name of “diversity” and “multiculturalism”, White countries are required to have open borders and legally enforced “diversity”.
Why is this so? Because there is a White genocide ongoing across many majority White countries today, and it has been for some time.
They’re not anti-racists – anti-racist is just a code word for anti-White.
It seems non-White Central American countries are doing more to stop illegal immigration that the United States government.
Honduras, El Salvador and Guatemala have come up with a plan to slow down legal and illegal immigration, mostly by improving their country’s economies and living conditions.
“The Plan of the Alliance for Prosperity in the Northern Triangle” which was presented by the Central American countries, would take money from the U.S. and use it to improve their countries. Unfortunately those are the only details of the plan given yet
“[The] plan aims to focus efforts in the communities of origin for the migrant population, in order to aid the creation of better conditions … and discourage the irregular migration that puts their lives and safety at risk,” said Hugo Martinez, the foreign minister for El Salvador.
Mexico has also increased it’s border patrol south of the country to turn back Central American illegal immigrants from crossing through Mexico on their way to the U.S.
Mexico has hired more immigration agents and is patrolling trains heading north more fervently.
Sure, Central American governments don’t care that much if the U.S. is being flooded with immigrants, but they are willing to care if they can get their hands on some money.
But at least it’s one step up from the anti-White US government which gets paid to secure its country’s borders, and does no such thing – in fact, it intentionally does the opposite.
America (the land) may not have originally been full of White, but the reason why it is being targeted for mass non-White immigration is because it is full of White people – and that’s the only reason.
If America was still majority American Indian, there would be no “melting pot”, “diversity” or “multiculturalism” agenda being forced on the country, because non-White people are considered “diverse” – therefore, they are not the “problem” that needs to be solved with “diversity”.
Anti-Whites are using mass non-White immigration and forced “diversity” (meaning no area can be “too White”) to turn the White population of many majority White countries into the minority.
Another word for this is genocide. This is White genocide, and it seems White Americans can trust Central American governments more than their own to protect White Americans from mass immigration.
John Key, the Prime Minister of New Zealand, plans to hold a vote in 2015 asking New Zealanders if they want to keep the current flag with the British Union Jack on it, or replace it with a new flag which represents the “changed” New Zealand.
The current flag has been in use for 122 years, and the British Union Jack in the corner is to show the country’s heritage. However, now that New Zealand is being flooded continually with non-White foreigners, (mostly Indians and Asians) some anti-Whites like PM Key think it is time to change the flag.
“I want to get on with it. To me, I’d like to do it in 2015, [...] I’d like to complete the whole process next year. I don’t think it’s one of those things we should hang around with forever” Key told the Washington Post.
“But the current flag represents the thinking by and about a young country moving from the 1800s to the 1900s [...] and when our forebears thought their colonial protector would always be there for their descendants.” Key said in a speech back in March 2014
“However, this country, the way we see ourselves in the world and the way others see us, has changed dramatically in the past century. Our flag does not reflect those changes.”
“We are in a tremendous position to enjoy the benefits and challenges that our inter-connected and globalised world offers.”
“A flag that unites all New Zealanders should be selected by all New Zealanders.”
One of the suggested flags is a silver fern leaf with a black background to represent New Zealand’s success in sports.
A poll conducted for TVNZ television channel, showed that 72% of people asked wanted to keep the current New Zealand flag, and only 28% wanted to change it.
The reason why anti-Whites would support changing this flag is to reinforce the belief that anyone can be a New Zealander if they ‘act’ like one.
In 1961, the country was 92% ethnically European, fast-forward to 2013, and the country is now 74% European.
This is clearly a program of genocide against White people. We can confidently say this because many majority White countries all over the planet have had their borders opened to mass non-White immigration, and as a result White countries are becoming less and less White.
Anti-Whites say that singling out White people, chasing us around the country, and flooding us with non-Whites is an experiment – they say it’s an experiment in “diversity” or a “global community” – no, it’s genocide.
If they are thinking of changing the flag, how about this one?
The Swedish election results from the 14th of September has been a wake up call to the anti-White establishment.
The Sweden Democrats, opposed to mass immigration, has won 12.9% of the votes in a country where practically all the parties call for open borders. This means it’s now the 3rd most popular party in Sweden.
“I think the success of the Sweden Democrats depends partly on the triangulation, the tendency not to take risks with policies, not to show the differences, which the Moderates introduced and the Social Democrats have also taken after.” said the former Swedish Prime Minister Göran Persson (from 1996 to 2006).
“One [political party] lays so close to the other so that when [Swedes are] angry and resigned there is nowhere else to protest,”
He said that places with “poor mobile phone coverage” and “trains that don’t run” were the areas that gave Sweden Democrats more votes, probably because the Swedish living there are fed up that their money is being spent on majority-immigrant areas while their areas receive less funding.
“All of this has been expressed [by the voters]. Sweden is falling apart…”
“Now we have a very clear warning, a real slap in the face for the Stockholm establishment in the form of these election results.”
Despite being shouted at and guilt-tripped on a daily basis, the people are starting not to care what horrible names they are called.
Persson is right, his Sweden is falling apart – his Sweden is a place where holding the wrong opinion on immigration is a taboo.
The reason why Sweden has a policy of mass non-White immigration and forced “diversity” is because it is ruled by those who want to get rid of White people, or at the very least turn us into a minority. It is nothing more than a policy of White genocide.
Check out this interview on the Afrikaner’s fight for survival against a much more violent form of White genocide.
Walter E. Williams, a Black professor of economics wrote an article in thenewsstar.com in which he explained his views on multiculturalism and Western civilization.
“At the heart of multiculturalism is an attack on Western and Christian values. Much of that attack has its roots on college campuses among the intellectual elite who see their mission as indoctrinating our youth.” he wrote.
“Students sit through lectures listening to professorial rants about topics such as globalism and Western exploitation of the Middle East and Third World peoples.”
He is right on the point here – college campuses and universities are the center of anti-White ideology; it’s basically where most people are taught to hate themselves.
If you take a look some of our past articles on anti-White colleges, you will see what I’m talking about.
“The U.S. is a nation of many races, ethnicities, religions and cultures. Since our inception, people from all over the world have immigrated here to become Americans.”
What he is saying here is that the US is a nation of immigrants. Williams probably doesn’t realize it, but he’s unwittingly using a line that anti-Whites use to justify turning White people in the US into the minority.
“Multiculturalists argue that different cultural values are morally equivalent. That’s nonsense. Western culture and values are superior. For those who’d accuse me of Eurocentrism, I’d ask: Is forcible female genital mutilation, as practiced in nearly 30 sub-Saharan African and Middle Eastern countries, a morally equivalent cultural value? Slavery is practiced in Mauritania, Mali, Niger, Chad and Sudan; is it morally equivalent?”
If the borders had not been flung open in so many White countries there would be no need to discuss “multiculturalism” because the majority (White people) would be in no danger of being replaced by another group
The borders were opened because this forced “diversity” and forced “multiculturalism” is intended to turn us into the minority – that’s White genocide.