Anti-Whites Claim A Plan To Move 5.5 Million Non-Whites Into Northern Ireland In The 80s Was A “Joke”

The anti-White establishment in Britain is now openly admitting it’s genocidal plans again the indigenous White Northern Irish people…but says it’s okay because it was all just a little “joke”

A recent news article had this to say

“Newly-declassified documents released at the National Archives in Kew, west London reveal how senior civil servants reacted enthusiastically to proposals in 1983 from a University of Reading academic that a chunk of Ulster – between Coleraine and Londonderry – be turned into a new home for Hong Kong’s 5.5m citizens.”

Just to be clear, the current population of Northern Ireland today is 1.8 million. If flooding 5.5 million non Whites into the Northern Irish peoples living space is not genocide as per the UN Genocide Convention then what is?

“Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.” (Article 2c Genocide Convention)

The article continues:

“The proponents of the plan, which one Northern Ireland office official declared should be “taken seriously”, suggested the mass transportation of Cantonese speakers would have the dual advantage of boosting the Ulster economy while solving Britain’s dilemma over what to do with the millions of Hong Kong residents concerned they would have no future under Chinese rule.”

The anti-Whites were “concerned” that 5.5 million non-Whites would have “no future” in Hong Kong but it didn’t seem to bother them that generations of White children would have no future in their ancestral homeland because it was turned non-White by traitors? That’s pretty anti-White don’t you think?

It seems that some anti-Whites are trying to pass this plan off as a “joke”, or so they claim. After all wouldn’t you lie about a genocidal scheme if your cover was blown?! How pathetic are these anti-Whites anyway?

The thing is, if it was just a “joke” as they are trying to pass it off as then why are they still working on the replacement of the Northern Irish today, albeit at a slower place? You see, it can be argued the only reason they didn’t go ahead with this plan in 1983 is because the N Irish would have noticed something was wrong if 5.5 million non-Whites were suddenly transplanted into their homeland. Instead they are taking the slow route to replacing the Northern Irish, only this time it includes: Africans, Middle Easterners AND Asians.

Let’s not forget either that a prominent anti-White “politician” in Northern Ireland is Anna Lo, originally from Hong Kong; an ardent proponent of anti-White policy in Northern Ireland today.

Remember folks, White genocide is not just happening in one or two White countries. This plan is for ALL and Only White countries.

m rally 779484jpg

Share

Did anti-White policies lead to the Charleston shooting?

Racially motivated attacks are a regular occurrence around the world. When dealing with tragedy, there are numerous examples we can learn from.
The Saint James church massacre in South Africa is one example.

Saint James was attacked because the church was predominately White.
Even though the death toll and injuries at Saint James were higher than the Charleston shooting, the congregation forgave the killers.
The attackers went before the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and were pardoned.

No one could imagine pardoning Dylann Roof, but we do demand answers.

Just as the Truth and Reconciliation commission determined that anti-White violence was the result of apartheid, this month’s message asks if the Charleston shooting was related to anti-White policies of White genocide.

Put this question in the public mind by promoting the message this month.
Appoint board of inquiry: Was the Charleston shooting a tragic result of anti-Whites’ program of White Genocide? | We the People: Your Voice in Our Government

Appoint board of inquiry: Was the Charleston shooting a tragic result of anti-Whites’ program of White Genocide?

Was Dylann Roof’s disturbed state partly the result of White Genocide that’s being carried out in White countries worldwide?
Massive immigration and forced assimilation is genocide by UN Convention:
“Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part.”
Whites are denied free speech in White countries so that they cannot oppose their genocide.
Those who deny Whites the right to speak openly and publicly against their own genocide say they are “anti-racist,” but of course what they are is anti-White.
In a world where “anti-racist” is a code word for anti-White, and political correctness in support of White Genocide is required, has a young White snapped and expressed himself with tragic violence?
goo.gl/Y8IZHk

Share

Hate words will not silence Tibetans and should not silence us either

It would be wrong to call a Tibetan “supremacist” for opposing Tibetan genocide, but when Whites speak out against our genocide, that is exactly what we are called.

The double standards are glaring.
The results of anti-White policies should be just as evident as the results in Tibet. Tibetans won’t be silenced and neither should we.

Don’t allow Hate Words to silence opposition to White genocide.

Promote the message by adding initials this month.
Are Tibetans who oppose their genocide “Tibetan Supremacists”? | We the People: Your Voice in Our

Are Tibetans who oppose their genocide “Tibetan Supremacists”?

Millions of Chinese are pouring into Tibet, and Tibetans are forced to integrate with them so that the Tibetans will “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.
Are Tibetans who oppose this genocide “Tibetan supremacists”?
ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are being flooded with millions of non-Whites, and Whites are forced to integrate with them so as to “assimilate,” i.e. intermarry and be blended out of existence.
But if I call for open discussion of this genocide of my race, the White race, I’m called a “White supremacist.”
Please issue a statement that “White supremacist” is a hate word that anti-Whites hide behind to carry out White Genocide!
They say they’re anti-racist, but what they are is anti-White!
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White.Government

Share

Charity is not what it used to be

In the past charity meant risking personal well being to go where help was needed.
Today charity can mean risking the existence of Whites as a group by bringing in millions of third worlders and force assimilating our native populations.

Charities are not what they used to be. Charities ask the general populace to fund White genocide and then take tax dollars at the same time.
The ongoing program of White genocide always needs funding and is willing to get it by any means possible.

Warn people about this anti-White genocidal scam by promoting the message this month.
Stop funding Christian and Jewish “charities” that carry out White Genocide | We the People: Your Voice in Our Government

Stop funding Christian and Jewish “charities” that carry out White Genocide

Asia for the Asians, Africa for the Africans, but White countries for EVERYONE?
These groups get federal funds to resettle third worlders in White communities throughout the United States:
Lutheran Immigrant Aid Society, US Conference of Catholic Bishops, Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society, Church World Service, Domestic and Foreign Missionary Service of the Episcopal Church of the USA.
Their program is to chase down and assimilate Whites until there are no children left White.
Massive immigration and forced assimilation is genocide when it’s done in Tibet.
When it’s done in White countries it’s “diversity.”
The groups above say they’re anti-racist. What they are is anti-White!
Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White.
Diversity is a codeword for White Genocide.
goo.gl/bbmp0S
goo.gl/zdUqff

Share

Overwhelming majority of Italians say no to “refugees”

italy1

Interviews of nearly a thousand Italians by Rai News, show that more than 8 out of 10 Italians say they do not want “refugees” brought into their country.

The interviews, conducted from the 23rd to the 24th of June also showed that:

▪ 1 out of 4 (25%) Italians thought immigration was the country’s top problem.

▪ 2 out of 5 (38%) thought immigration was a a serious security threat and can be connected to terrorism.

▪ Over 2 out of 5 (40%) wanted to send illegal immigrants back and use the military if necessary.

▪ Only 1 out of 4 (16%) wanted to bring in “refugees”.

It’s good to see that most Italians have not been fooled by the “refugee” label.

Both the mainstream media and government are trying to “repackage” illegal immigrants as these vulnerable “refugees” who were forced to flee . . . but no one will tell us why they pass through several safe countries on their way to Europe.

Interestingly, the survey found that 2 out of 5 (34%) thought Italian Prime Minister, Matteo Renzi, does not protect the national interest.

This week Renzi scorned other European countries in an emotional outburst for not accepting a quota on illegal immigrants, saying that “you aren’t worthy of calling yourselves Europe.”

I can see why a growing number of Italians are unhappy with this anti-White sleazebag. He tried to push yet more White genocide on Europe, but turned into a big cry-baby when democracy ensued.

Maybe it’s time for a White-friendly Prime Minister, Italy? (And some new pants for Mr Renzi…)

Share

If there is no such thing as race, how can we have “diversity?”

This question was recently posed by Bob Whitaker, the American Freedom Party’s candidate for U.S. Vice President.

 

Here are some of the comments made by BUGSers in response to the question.

If White People and White countries don’t exist, then why do they need to have diversity forced on them?

If there is no such thing as race, how do we know which countries “lack diversity?”

If ‘race is a social construct’, how can Whites be racist?

Can someone tell me if anyone has ever been charged with the genocide of social constructs?

“The name of the Genocide Treaty shows that saying race does not exist is no defense against a charge of genocide.”

.
If there is no such thing as race, who or what is a “minority”?
.
If race is a social construct, than celebrating diversity is celebrating a social construct?

 

Share

Illegal immigrant quota may destroy the EU

euro-immigrants

Despite demands from top-level EU politicians, many in Europe are standing their ground against the forced illegal immigrant quota.

Why have they [Italy and Greece] resigned from protecting the borders?said Slovakian Interior Minister, Robert Kaliňák.

If we don’t guard a border, why then do we have a visa policy when we don’t have a problem letting anyone in who swims to our shores?

A return policy must be enforced. As things are, every illegal immigrant can feel safe because they know that they can’t be expelled. So they board boats because they know that they won’t have to come back” said Kaliňák.

Donald Tusk, the president of the European council, had a similar view.

First and foremost, we need to contain illegal migration and this should be our priority. All those who are not legitimate asylum seekers will have no guarantee that they will stay in EuropeTusk said.

We have no consensus among member states on mandatory quotas for migrants,” he added.

Libya has already offered help on at least two occasions, but the anti-White ruling class actually want these immigrants.

So, now that they have created this mass migration problem, they are trying to “fix” it by effectively destroying Europe’s borders.

Lets get to the bottom line on this: the ONLY reason Europe is forced to have immigration – legal and illegal – is because it’s majority White. The same is true of America, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand.

“Diversity” is being used as a code word to mean that no area can be “too White”. If you target White areas for deliberate demographics change, then it’s nothing more than White genocide.

Share

Professor of Beyonce gets away with anti-White tweets

kevin_allred

A White professor who teaches children about the pop singer Beyoncé, has written a series of anti-White posts on Twitter in a shallow attempt to guilt trip and shame an entire race of people.

The professor, Kevin Allred, teaches his “Politicizing Beyoncé.” course at Rutgers University, New Jersey, and has not even had as much as a word of disagreement from the University administration for his rants on Twitter.

In one of his posts he says that “THERE ARE NO GOOD . THERE ARE ONLY LESS BAD WHITE PEOPLE!!!

While in another two posts, he says that White culture does not exist and is also “racist“.

When he later wrote to a journalist, he tried to deny what he had said.

I didn’t say there are no good white people” Allred said, “I meant until the system changes completely to erase these stereotypes in general, no white people should be seen as de facto good. We (white people) should be seen in grades of ‘less bad’ to balance out the ways other groups are unfairly seen.

There are a lot of crazy self-hating anti-Whites in academia who think that this opinion is “progressive”. It’s not – it’s White genocide.

We regularly say that anti-racist is a codeword for anti-White, and it’s people like him who prove our point.

Share

Morris Dees and Richard Cohen share “Helpful Anti-White of the Month” Award

This month we’re holding a special double award ceremony for Morris Dees, the founder of the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), and for Richard Cohen, the president of that organization.

Usually these two anti-white luminaries leave public appearances to Hiedi Beirich and Mark Potok, but the tragic Charleston church massacre provided them with an opportunity too good to pass up to come out and do yeomen work in helping us propagate our Stop White Genocide memes.

In addition to mentioning White Genocide in television interviews, they co-wrote a very fine NYTimes op ed that stated,

In recent years, extremists have distilled the notion of white genocide to “the mantra,” parts of which show up on billboards throughout the South, as well as in Internet chat rooms. It proclaims “Diversity = White Genocide” and “Diversity Means Chasing Down the Last White Person”

White Supremacists Without Borders

Of course the NYTimes headline called us “White supremacists,” but we’re sure that wasn’t Mr. Dees’ or Mr. Cohen’s doing, since those gentlemen display too much obvious skill at spreading our Mantra memes in their op ed to not know that “White Supremacist” is just a hate word that anti-whites hide behind while they carry out White Genocide by massive immigration and forced assimilation.
.
So it’s with unabashed pleasure that we award Mr. Dees and Mr. Cohen this month’s “Helpful Anti-White of the Month” award!

TROPHY%20AWARDS%20-%20MORRIS%20DEES3

 

TROPHY%20AWARDS%20-%20RICHARD%20COHEN3

 

Share